Browse > Article

Comparison of pooled Versus Individual Sera in Avian Infectious Bronchitis Virus Seroprevalence Study  

Kim, Sa-Rim (School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University)
Kwon, Hyuk-Moo (School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University)
Sung, Haan-Woo (School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University)
Pak, Son-Il (School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Veterinary Clinics / v.23, no.4, 2006 , pp. 416-420 More about this Journal
Abstract
Compare to testing sera individually, pooled-serum testing has considered as a cost-effective method, particularly on a large population-based seroprevalence studies. This study was to determine the relationship between individual sera and pooled sera titers for detection of avian infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) and to evaluate suitability of pooled sera by comparing prevalences estimated from both samples. A total of 5,000 individual samples were collected from 500 flocks in Chungcheong, Gyunsgi, and Kangwon provinces between January 2005 and February 2006. Ten samples were randomly selected from each flock. Five-hundred pooled sera were prepared by mixing equal amount of each 10 individual serum from the original samples. IBV antibody titers were measured by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test. The least squares regression analysis was performed to construct equation between pooled and mean individual titers. To determine whether the flock is infected 4 arbitrary criteria were used: detection of at least 1 chicken with HI titer ${\ge}$ 9 (criterion 1), detection of at least 2 samples with HI titer ${\ge}$9 (criterion 2), detection of at least 1 sample with HI titer ${\ge}$ 10 (criterion 3), and filially detection of at least 1 sample with HI titer ${\ge}$ 11 (criterion 4). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to examine the cut-off points of pooled titers showing optimal diagnostic accuracy. The area under the curve (AUC), sensitivities (Se), specificities (Sp), and positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated. The regression equation between pooled titers (pool) and mean individual titers (mean) was: $pool= 1.2498+0.8952{\times}mean$, with coefficient of determination of 87% (p< 0.0001). The optimal cut-off points of pooled titers were titer 8 for criterion 1 (AUC=0.975, Se=0.883, Sp=0.959, PPV=0.985, NPV=0.728), titer 8 for criterion 2 (AUC=0.969, Se=0.954, Sp=0.855, PPV=0.926, NPV=0.907), titer 9 for criterion 3 (AUC=0.970, Se=0.836, Sp=0.967, PPV=0.978, NPV=0.772), and titer 9 for criterion 4 (AUC= 0.946, Se=0.928, Sp=0.843, PPV=0.857, NPV=0.921). The difference of 'prevalence estimated by individual and pooled sample showed a minimum of 2% for criteria 2 and a maximum of 9.1:% for criteria 3. These results indicate that the use of pooled sera in HI test for screening IBV infection in laying hen flocks is considered as a cost-effective method of testing large numbers of samples with high diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords
Chicken infectious bronchitis; HI; pooled sera; ROC curve; seroprevalence;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, Reid WM, Yoder HW. Diseases of poultry. 9th ed. pp. Iowa State University Press. 1991: 471-484
2 Cowling DW, Gardner IA, Johnson WO. Comparison of methods for estimation of individual-level prevalence based on pooled samples. Prev Vet Med 1999; 39: 211 -225   DOI   ScienceOn
3 De Wit JJ. Detection of infectious bronchitis virus. Avian Pathol 2000; 29: 71-93   DOI
4 Hauck WW. Confidence intervals for seroprevalence determined from pooled sera. Ann Epidemiol 1991; 1: 277-281   DOI   ScienceOn
5 King DJ, Hopkins SR. Rapid serotyping of infectious bronchitis virus isolates with the hemagglutination-inhibition test. Avian Dis 1984; 28: 727-733   DOI   ScienceOn
6 McMartin DA. Infectious bronchitis. In: McFerran JB, McNulty MS (eds). Virus infections of birds. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1993: 249-275
7 박선일, 한홍율. 수의 임상 역학 및 통계. 1999: 서울: 한길아카데미, 118-128
8 Smith RD. Veterinary clinical epidemiology: a problem-oriented approach. NY: Buttorworth-Heinemann. 1991: 29-43
9 Swets JA. Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 1988; 240: 1285-1293   DOI
10 Evers EG, Nauta MJ. Estimation of animal-level prevalence from pooled samples in animal production. Prev Vet Med 2001; 49: 175-190   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Wells SJ, Godden SM, Lindeman CJ, Collins JE. Evaluation of bacteriologic culture of individual and pooled fecal samples for detection of Mycobacterium paratuberculosis in daily cattle herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 223: 1022-1025   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Sacks JM, Bolin SR, Crowder SV, Prevalence estimation from pooled samples. Am J Vet Res 1989; 50: 205-2066
13 장정호, 김선중. 닭 전염성 기관지염에 관한 연구: II. 간접 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)에 의한 항체가 측정. 대한수의학회지 1989; 29: 503-515
14 Frdderick AM, Marian CH, Michael JS. Veterinary virology. 3rd ed. Academic Press. 1999: 505-507
15 Zenios SA, Wein LM. Pooled testing for HIV prevalence estimation: exploiting the dilution effect. Stat Med 1998; 17: 1447-1467   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Kline RL, Brothers TA, Brookmeyer R, Zeger S, Quinn TC. Evaluation of human immunodeficiency virus seroprevalence in population surveys using pooled sera. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 1449-1452
17 Cahoon-Young B, Chandler A, Livermore T, Gaudino J, Benjamin R. Sensitivity and specificity of pooled versus individual sera in a human immunodeficiency virus antibody prevalence study. J Clin Microbiol 1989; 27: 1893-1895
18 Greiner M, Pfeiffer D, Smith RD. Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Prev Vet Med 2000; 45: 23-41   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Jordan D. Simulating the sensitivity of pooled-sample herd tests for fecal Salmonella in cattle. Prev Vet Med 2005; 70: 59-73   DOI   ScienceOn
20 박선일, 구희승, 황철용, 윤화영. 진단검사에서 ROC 곡선의 응용. 한국임상수의학회지 2002; 19: 312-315
21 Christensen J, Gardner IA. Herd-level interpretation of test results for epidemiologic studies of animal diseases. Prev Vet Med 2000; 45: 83-106   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Dorfman R. The detection of defective members of large populations. Ann Math Stat 1943; 14: 436-440   DOI
23 OIE (World organization for animal health). Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals (mammals, birds and bees). 5th ed. Paris: OIE. 2004: 878-888