Browse > Article

Comparative Effectiveness between Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 Inhibitors and Sulfonylureas in Combination with Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients  

Park, Ji Hye (Division of Pharmaceutical Services, Asan Medical Center)
Park, Sunny (College of Pharmacy & Division of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Jae Youn (Division of Pharmaceutical Services, Asan Medical Center)
Kim, Joo Hee (College of Pharmacy & Division of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ewha Womans University)
Gwak, Hye Sun (Graduate School of Clinical Health Sciences, Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Clinical Pharmacy / v.25, no.2, 2015 , pp. 74-79 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective: Treatment with sulfonylureas in combination with metformin improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. This retrospective study aims to compare the effectiveness of dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and sulfonylureas as an add-on therapy to metformin in patients with T2DM. Methods: Data from medical records of 355 T2DM patients received therapy either DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4 inhibitor group) or sulfonylurea (SU group) in combination with metformin from 1 March 2009 to 30 September 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Of total 355 patients, 231 patients were in DPP-4 inhibitor group and 124 patients were in SU group. Baseline Hemoglobin $A_{1c}$ ($HbA_{1c}$) level in SU group was higher than DPP-4 inhibitor group with a statistically significant difference (8.6% vs. 7.8%). Comparative analysis between DPP-4 inhibitor group and SU group was performed for $HbA_{1c}$ values, amounts of $HbA_{1c}$ changes, and rates of $HbA_{1c}$ changes from baseline at 6-month intervals and incidence rates of major cardiocerebral events. Results: SU group showed larger $HbA_{1c}$ changes in both amounts and rates compared to DPP-4 inhibitor group, although statistical significance was not found in all study periods. Proportions of patients with stable $HbA_{1c}$ <6.5% or 7% were significantly higher in DPP-4 inhibitor group than SU group (<6.5%: 30.4% vs. 13.4%, <7%: 72.3% vs. 41.2%). Time to achieve stable $HbA_{1c}$ <6.5% was not significantly different, but time to achieve stable $HbA_{1c}$ <7% was shorter in DPP4 inhibitor group than SU group with a significant difference. The incidence rate of cardiocerebral events in group of patients with or without previous events was 1.7%, not significantly lower than that in DPP-4 inhibitor group (4.0%). For newly encountered cardiocerebral events during the treatment, incidence rates of two groups did not differ significantly. Conclusion: DPP-4 inhibitors were as effective as sulfonylureas in achieving the $HbA_{1c}$ goal of less than 6.5% or 7% and cardiocerebral event rates did not differ between the two drugs.
Keywords
dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; sulfonylurea; efficacy; cardiocerebral event; type 2 diabetes mellitus;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet 2010;375(9733): 2215-22.   DOI
2 Morrish, NJ, Wang, SL, Stevens, LK, et al. Mortality and causes of death in the WHO multinational study of vascular disease in diabetes. Diabetologia 2001;44(Suppl. 2):S14-S21.   DOI
3 Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000;32(7258):405-12.
4 Filozof C, Gautier JF. A comparison of efficacy and safety of vildagliptin and gliclazide in combination with metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone: a 52-week, randomized study. Diabet Med 2010;27(3):318-26.   DOI
5 Seck T, Nauck M, Sheng D, et al. Safety and efficacy of treatment with sitagliptin or glipizide in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin: a 2-year study. Int J Clin Pract 2010; 64(5):562-76.   DOI
6 Gallwitz B, Rosenstock J, Emser A, et al. Linagliptin is more effective than glimepiride at achieving a composite outcome of target HbA1c < 7% with no hypoglycaemia and no weight gain over 2 years. Int J Clin Pract 2013;67(4):317-21.   DOI
7 Karagiannis T, Paschos P, Paletas K, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2012;344:e1369-83.   DOI
8 Zhang Y, Hong J, Chi J, et al. Head-to-head comparison of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors and sulfonylureas - a meta-analysis from randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2014;30(3):241-56.   DOI
9 Rathmann W, Kostev K, Gruenberger JB, et al. Treatment persistence, hypoglycaemia and clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and sulphonylureas: a primary care database analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2013;15(1):55-61.   DOI
10 Patil HR, Al Badarin FJ, Al Shami HA, et al. Meta-analysis of effect of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 2012;110(6):826-33.   DOI
11 Green JB, Bethel MA, Paul SK, et al. Rationale, design, and organization of a randomized, controlled Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TESCO) in patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease. Am Heart J 2013;166(6):983-9.   DOI
12 Hirst JA, Farmer AJ, Dyar A, et al. Estimating the effect of sulfonylurea on HbA1c in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2013;56(5):973-84.   DOI
13 Sherifali D, Nerenberg K, Pullenayegum E, et al. The effect of oral antidiabetic agents on A1C levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2010;33(8):1859-64.   DOI
14 Park H, Park C, Kim Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother 2012;46(11):1453-69.   DOI
15 DeFronzo RA, Stonehouse AH, Han J, et al. Relationship of baseline HbA1c and efficacy of current glucose-lowering therapies: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabet Med 2010;27(3):309-317.   DOI
16 Morgan CL, Mukherjee J, Jenkins-Jones S, et al. Combination therapy with metformin plus sulphonylureas versus metformin plus DPP-4 inhibitors: association with major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014;16(10):977-83.   DOI
17 Bloomgarden ZT, Dodis R, Viscoli CM, et al. Lower baseline glycemia reduces apparent oral agent glucose-lowering efficacy. Diabetes Care 2006;29(9):2137-9.   DOI
18 Esposito K, Cozzolino D, Bellastella G, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and HbA1c target of < 7% in type 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011;13(7):594-603.   DOI
19 Monami M, Genovese S, Mannucci E. Cardiovascular safety of sulfonylureas: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 2013;15(10):938-53.   DOI
20 Yu OH, Yin H, Azoulay L. The combination of DPP-4 inhibitors versus sulfonylureas with metformin after failure of first-line treatment in the risk for major cardiovascular events and death. Can J Diabetes 2015, Epub ahead of print.