Interobserver Variability in the Interpretation of Microcalcifications in Digital Magnification Mammographies |
Jeon, Su-Jin
(Department of Radiology, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital)
Kim, Min-Jung (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Kim, Eun-Kyung (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Son, Eun-Ju (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Youk, Ji-Hyun (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Kwak, Jin-Young (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine) Choi, Seon-Hyeong (Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine) |
1 | Hermann KP, Obenauer S, Funke M, Grabbe EH. Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2188- 2191 DOI |
2 | Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, Sullivan DC. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology 1999;211:845-850 DOI |
3 | Bent CK, Bassett LW, D'Orsi CJ, Sayre JW. The positive predictive value of BI-RADS microcalcification descriptors and final assessment categories. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194:1378-1383 DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Jiang Y, Nishikawa RM, Schmidt RA, Toledano AY, Doi K. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology 2001;220:787-794 DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Berg WA, D'Orsi CJ, Jackson VP, Bassett LW, Beam CA, Lewis RS, et al. Does training in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) improve biopsy recommendations or feature analysis agreement with experiencexperienced breast imagers at mammography? Radiology 2002;224:871-880 DOI ScienceOn |
6 | Blank RG, Wallis MG, Given-Wilson RM. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography. J Med Screen 1999;6:152-158 DOI |
7 | Ciccone G, Vineis P, Frigerio A, Segnan N. Inter-observer and intra- observer variability of mammogram interpretation: a field study. Eur J Cancer 1992;28A:1054-1058 |
8 | Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Munzel U, Baum F, Grabbe E. Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality, detectability and characterization of lesions. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1697-1702 DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Fischer U, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, et al. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2679-2683 |
10 | Fischer U, Hermann KP, Baum F. Digital mammography: current state and future aspects. Eur Radiol 2006;16:38-44 DOI ScienceOn |
11 | 조소연, 최철순, 김호철, 최문혜, 김은아, 배상훈 등. X선 유방촬영술의 판독에 있어서 판독자간 일치율: 악성종양을 시사하는 소견을 중심으로. 대한방사선의학회지 1996;34:133-137 |
12 | 이경재, 이원철, 황인영, 김미혜, 김학희, 박용규 등. 유방촬영술의 판독자간 일치도. 대한영상의학회지 2004;51:351-356 |
13 | Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 2006;239:385-391 DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Berg WA, Campassi C, Langenberg P, Sexton MJ. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1769-1777 DOI ScienceOn |
15 | Cosar ZS, Cetin M, Tepe TK, Cetin R, Zarali AC. Concordance of mammographic classifications of microcalcifications in breast cancer diagnosis: utility of the breast imaging reporting and data system (fourth edition). Clin Imaging 2005;29:389-395 |
16 | Fleiss JL. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1981 |
17 | Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174 DOI ScienceOn |
18 | Feig SA, Galkin BM, Muir HD. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications by means of optically magnified tissue specimen radiographs. Recent Results Cancer Res 1987;105:111-123 |
19 | Sickles EA. Mammographic features of 300 consecutive nonpalpable breast cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146:661-663 DOI ScienceOn |
20 | American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system, breast imaging atlas. 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003 |
21 | Sickles EA, Doi K, Genant HK. Magnification film mammography: image quality and clinical studies. Radiology 1977;125:69-76 DOI |
22 | Sickles EA. Further experience with microfocal spot magnification mammography in the assessment of clustered breast microcalcifications. Radiology 1980;137:9-14 DOI |