1 |
Galen B, Staab E, Sullivan DC, Pisano ED. Congressional update: Report from the Biomedical Imaging Program of the National Cancer Institute. American College of Radiology Imaging Network: The digital mammographic imaging screening trial-an update. Acad RadioI 2002;9:374-375
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Lell M, Bohner C, Wenkel E, Imhoff K, et al. Phantom study for the detection of simulated lesions in five different digital and one conventional mammography system. Rofo 2004;176:1127-1132
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading-Oslo I study. Radiology 2003;229:877-884
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Moon WK. The Use of computer-aided detection system and digital mammography in Seoul National University Hospital. The Second Seoul International Symposium for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Proceedings. 2004;24-25
|
5 |
Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Skarpathiotakis M, Shumak RS, Danjoux NM, unesekara A, et al. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2003;228:842-850
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood S, D' Orsi C, Feig SA, Kopans DB, O' Shaughnessy KF, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000;215:554-562
DOI
PUBMED
|
7 |
Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, Kopans DB, Castleberry DE, Opsahl-Ong BH, et aL Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997;205:399-406
DOI
PUBMED
|
8 |
Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1456-1461
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 2004;230:25-27
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1493-1499
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Fischer D, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, et aL Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur RadioI 2002;12:2679-2683
|
12 |
Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1081-1087
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D' Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screenfilm mammography for cancer detection: results of 4945 paired examinations. Radiology 2001;218:873-880
DOI
PUBMED
|
14 |
Lehtimaki M, Pamilo M, Raulisto L. Diagnostic clinical benefits of digital spot and digital 3D mammography following analysis of screening findings. SPIE Medical Imaging 2003;5029:698-706
|
15 |
Shtern F. Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. Radiology 1992;183:629-630
DOI
PUBMED
|
16 |
Rong XJ, Shaw CC, Johnston DA, Lemacks MR, Liu X, Whitman GJ, et al. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: fiat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film. Med Phys 2002;29:2052-2061
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Veronesi D, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, Banfi A, Clemente C, De Lena M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med 1981;305:6-11
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Shtern F, Winfield D. Report of the working group on digital mammography: digital displays and workstation design. Acad Radiol 1999;6:S197-S218
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
문우경. 유방암의 최신진단법, 대한의사협회지 2003;46:490-496
|
20 |
Lewin JM, D' Orsi CJ. Hendrick RE, Moss LJ, Isaacs PK, Karellas A, et al. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography for detection of breast cancer. AIR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:671-677
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computeraided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001;220:781-786
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
조나리야, 차주희, 문우경. 유방암의 컴퓨터 보조진단. 대한유방검진학회지 2004;1:111-115
|
23 |
Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, Larke FJ. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 2003;229:261-268
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Smith RA, Saslow DB, Sawyer K, Burke W, Costanza ME, Evans WP 3rd, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:141-169
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 1994;39:1629-1638
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Skaane P, Skjennald A. Screen-film mammography versus fullfield digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program-the Oslo II Study. Radiology 2004;232:197-204
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Morrow M, Strom E, Bassett LW, Fowble B, Giuliano A, Harris JR, et al. Standards for breast conserving therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:277-300
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Yaffe MJ. Detectors for digital mammography. In Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ, Kuzmiak CM. Digital mammography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Willkins, 2004:15-26
|
29 |
Pisano ED, Cole EB, Kistner EO, Muller KE, Hemminger BM, Brown ML, et aL Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology 2002;223:483-488
DOI
ScienceOn
|
30 |
Kapur A, Carson PL, Eberhard J, Goodsitt MM, Thomenius K, Lokhandwalla M, et al. Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2004;3:325-334
DOI
PUBMED
|
31 |
Yaffe MJ. Quality control for digital mammography. In Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ, Kuzmiak CM. Digital mammography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Willkins, 2004:33-42
|