Browse > Article

Digital Mammography  

Cho, Na-Ri-Ya (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, SNUMRC)
Cha, Joo-Hee (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, SNUMRC)
Moon, Woo-Kyung (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and the Institute of Radiation Medicine, SNUMRC)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology / v.52, no.4, 2005 , pp. 225-231 More about this Journal
Abstract
Mammography is the best imaging modality for the detection of early breast cancer in asymptomatic women. However, 10-30% of cases are missed with current film-screen mammography. Digital mammography allows for the separate optimization of image acquisition and display. In addition to the obvious data storage, retrieval, and transmission advantages that digital mammography allows, additional advances such as computer-aided diagnosis, tomosynthesis and dual energy mammography are in development. This review will discuss the technology of digital mammography including detectors and displays, the results of clinical trials comparing film-screen and digital mammography, and the use of computer-aided detection. Digital mammography is a promising new technology for breast cancer detection in the Korean women.
Keywords
Breast cancer; Digital mammography; Computer-aided diagnosis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Galen B, Staab E, Sullivan DC, Pisano ED. Congressional update: Report from the Biomedical Imaging Program of the National Cancer Institute. American College of Radiology Imaging Network: The digital mammographic imaging screening trial-an update. Acad RadioI 2002;9:374-375   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Schulz-Wendtland R, Hermann KP, Lell M, Bohner C, Wenkel E, Imhoff K, et al. Phantom study for the detection of simulated lesions in five different digital and one conventional mammography system. Rofo 2004;176:1127-1132   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 Skaane P, Young K, Skjennald A. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading-Oslo I study. Radiology 2003;229:877-884   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Moon WK. The Use of computer-aided detection system and digital mammography in Seoul National University Hospital. The Second Seoul International Symposium for Computer-Aided Diagnosis Proceedings. 2004;24-25
5 Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Skarpathiotakis M, Shumak RS, Danjoux NM, unesekara A, et al. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2003;228:842-850   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood S, D' Orsi C, Feig SA, Kopans DB, O' Shaughnessy KF, et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000;215:554-562   DOI   PUBMED
7 Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, Kopans DB, Castleberry DE, Opsahl-Ong BH, et aL Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 1997;205:399-406   DOI   PUBMED
8 Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1456-1461   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Harvey JA, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 2004;230:25-27   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Elmore JG, Wells CK, Lee CH, Howard DH, Feinstein AR. Variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1493-1499   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
11 Fischer D, Baum F, Obenauer S, Luftner-Nagel S, von Heyden D, Vosshenrich R, et aL Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography. Eur RadioI 2002;12:2679-2683
12 Mandelson MT, Oestreicher N, Porter PL, White D, Finder CA, Taplin SH, et al. Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1081-1087   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D' Orsi CJ, Isaacs PK, Moss LJ, Karellas A, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screenfilm mammography for cancer detection: results of 4945 paired examinations. Radiology 2001;218:873-880   DOI   PUBMED
14 Lehtimaki M, Pamilo M, Raulisto L. Diagnostic clinical benefits of digital spot and digital 3D mammography following analysis of screening findings. SPIE Medical Imaging 2003;5029:698-706
15 Shtern F. Digital mammography and related technologies: a perspective from the National Cancer Institute. Radiology 1992;183:629-630   DOI   PUBMED
16 Rong XJ, Shaw CC, Johnston DA, Lemacks MR, Liu X, Whitman GJ, et al. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: fiat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film. Med Phys 2002;29:2052-2061   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Veronesi D, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, Banfi A, Clemente C, De Lena M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med 1981;305:6-11   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
18 Shtern F, Winfield D. Report of the working group on digital mammography: digital displays and workstation design. Acad Radiol 1999;6:S197-S218   DOI   ScienceOn
19 문우경. 유방암의 최신진단법, 대한의사협회지 2003;46:490-496
20 Lewin JM, D' Orsi CJ. Hendrick RE, Moss LJ, Isaacs PK, Karellas A, et al. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography for detection of breast cancer. AIR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:671-677   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computeraided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001;220:781-786   DOI   ScienceOn
22 조나리야, 차주희, 문우경. 유방암의 컴퓨터 보조진단. 대한유방검진학회지 2004;1:111-115
23 Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, Larke FJ. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 2003;229:261-268   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Smith RA, Saslow DB, Sawyer K, Burke W, Costanza ME, Evans WP 3rd, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin 2003;53:141-169   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol 1994;39:1629-1638   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Skaane P, Skjennald A. Screen-film mammography versus fullfield digital mammography with soft-copy reading: randomized trial in a population-based screening program-the Oslo II Study. Radiology 2004;232:197-204   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Morrow M, Strom E, Bassett LW, Fowble B, Giuliano A, Harris JR, et al. Standards for breast conserving therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:277-300   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Yaffe MJ. Detectors for digital mammography. In Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ, Kuzmiak CM. Digital mammography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Willkins, 2004:15-26
29 Pisano ED, Cole EB, Kistner EO, Muller KE, Hemminger BM, Brown ML, et aL Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film display. Radiology 2002;223:483-488   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Kapur A, Carson PL, Eberhard J, Goodsitt MM, Thomenius K, Lokhandwalla M, et al. Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2004;3:325-334   DOI   PUBMED
31 Yaffe MJ. Quality control for digital mammography. In Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ, Kuzmiak CM. Digital mammography. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Willkins, 2004:33-42