Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15324/kjcls.2020.52.3.202

Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis for Microbiome Data Matching between Objects  

You, Hee Sang (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, School of Medicine, Eulji University)
Ok, Yeon Jeong (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, School of Medicine, Eulji University)
Lee, Song Hee (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, School of Medicine, Eulji University)
Lee, So Lip (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, School of Medicine, Eulji University)
Lee, Young Ju (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, School of Medicine, Eulji University)
Lee, Min Ho (Department of Senior Healthcare, BK21 Plus Program, Graduate School, Eulji University)
Hyun, Sung Hee (Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, School of Medicine, Eulji University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science / v.52, no.3, 2020 , pp. 202-213 More about this Journal
Abstract
Although technological advances have allowed the efficient collection of large amounts of microbiome data for microbiological studies, proper analysis tools for such big data are still lacking. Additionally, analyses of microbial communities using poor databases can lead to misleading results. Hence, this study aimed to design an appropriate method for the analysis of big microbial databases. Bacteria were collected from the fingertips and personal belongings (mobile phones and laptop keyboards) of individuals. The genomic DNA was extracted from these bacteria and subjected to next-generation sequencing by targeting the 16S rRNA gene. The accuracy of the bacterial matching percentage between the fingertips and personal belongings was verified using a formula and an environment-related and human-related database. To design appropriate analysis, the bacterial matching accuracy was calculated based on the following three categories: comparison between qualitative and quantitative analysis, comparisons within same-gender participants as well as all participants regardless of gender, and comparison between the use of a human-related bacterial database (hDB) and environment-related bacterial database (eDB). The results showed that qualitative analysis, comparisons within same-gender participants, and the use of hDB provided relatively accurate results. This study provides an analytical method to obtain accurate results when conducting studies involving big microbiological data using human-derived microorganisms.
Keywords
Environment-related bacterial database (eDB); Human-related bacterial database (hDB); Microbiota matching; Qualitative analysis; Quantitative analysis;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Chen L, Zheng D, Liu B, Yang J, Jin, Q. VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis-10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D694-D697. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1239   DOI
2 Jansson JK, Prosser JI. Microbiology: The life beneath our feet. Nature. 2013;494:40-41. https://doi.org/10.1038/494040a   DOI
3 Lal R. The new science of metagenomics: fourth domain of life. Indian J Microbiol. 2011;51:245-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-011-0183-5   DOI
4 Henderson G, Yilmaz P, Kumar S, Forster RJ, Kelly WJ, Leahy SC, et al. Improved taxonomic assignment of rumen bacterial 16S rRNA sequences using a revised SILVA taxonomic framework. PeerJ. 2019;7:E6496. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6496   DOI
5 Rajan SK, Lindqvist M, Brummer RJ, Schoultz I, Repsilber D. Phlogenetic microbiota profiling in fecal samples depends on combination of sequencing depth and choice of NGS analysis method. PLoS ONE, 2019;14:E0222171. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222171   DOI
6 Woerner AE, Novroski NMM, Wendt FR, Ambers A, Wiley R, Schemede SE, et al. Forensic human identification with targeted microbiome markers using nearest neighbor classification. Forensic Science International. Genetics. 2019;38:130-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.10.003
7 Blaser MJ, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Estrada I, et al. Distinct cutaneous bacterial assemblages in a sampling of South American Amerindians and US residents. ISME J. 2013;7:85-95. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.81   DOI
8 Vasileiadis S, Puglisi E, Arena M, Cappa F, Cocconcelli PS, Trevisan M. Soil bacterial diversity screening using single 16S rRNA gene V regions coupled with multi-million read generating sequencing technologies. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:E472671 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042671
9 Kim HN, Yun Y, Ryu S, Chang Y, Kwon MJ, Cho J, et al. Correlation between gut microbiota and personality in adults: a cross-sectional study. Brain Behav Immun. 2018;69:374-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2017.12.012   DOI
10 Grice EA, Kong HH, Renaud G, Young AC. NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Bouffard GG, et al. A diversity profile of the human skin microbiota. Genome Res. 2008;18:1043-1050. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.075549.107   DOI
11 Oh J, Byrd AL, Park M, NISC Comparative Sequencing Program, Kong HH, Segre JA. Temporal stability of the human skin microbiome. Cell. 2016;165:854-566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.008   DOI
12 Rothschild D, Weissbrod O, Barkan E, Kurilshikov A, Korem T, Zeevi D, et al. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping hyman gut microbiota. Nature. 2018;555:210-215. https://doi.org/10.103/nature25973   DOI
13 Si JY, Lee SH, Park JM, Sung JH, Ko GP. Genetic associations and shared environmental effects on the skin microbiome of Korean twins. BMC genomics. 2015;16:992. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-2131-y   DOI
14 Petrosino JF, Highlander S, Luna RA, Gibbs RA, Verslovic J. Metagenomic pyrosequencing and microbial identification. Clin Chem. 2009;55:856-866. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.107565   DOI
15 Tringe SG, Mering CV, KobyashiA, Salamov AA, Chen K, Chang HW, et al. Comparative metagenomics of microbial communities. Science. 2005;308:554-557. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107851   DOI
16 Qian J, Hospodsky D, Yamamoto N, Nazaroff WW, Peccia J. Size resolved emission rates of airborne bacteria and fungi in an occupied classroom. Indoor Air. 2012;22:339-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2012.00769.x   DOI
17 Fierer N, Lauber CL, Zhou N, McDonald D, Costello EK, Knight R. Forensic identification using skin bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107:6477-6481. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000162107   DOI
18 Lax S, Hampton-Marcell JT, Gibbons SM, Colares GB, Smith D, Eisen JA, et al. Forensic analysis of the microbiome of phones and shoes. Microbiome. 2015;3:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-015-0082-9   DOI
19 Meadow JF, Altrichter AE, Bateman AC, Stenson J, Brown GZ, Green JL, et al. Humans differ in their personal microbial cloud. Peer J. 2015;3:E1258. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1258   DOI
20 Adams RI, Bhangar S, Paut W, Arens EA, Taylor JW, Lindow SE, et al. Chamber bioaerosol study: out door air and human occupants as sources of indoor airborne microbes. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10:E0128022. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128022   DOI
21 Oh J, Byrd AL, Park M, Kong HH, Segre JA. Temporal stability of the human skin microbiome. Cell. 2016;165:854-866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.008   DOI
22 Costello EK, Lauber CL, Hamady M, Fierer N, Gordon JI, Knight R. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 2009;326:1694-1697. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1177486   DOI
23 Mardis ER. Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2008;9: 387-402. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164359   DOI
24 Fadrosh DW, Ma B, Gajer P, Sengamalay N, Ott, Brotman RM, Ravel J. An improved dual-indexing approach for multiplexed 16S rRNA gene sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Microbiome. 2014;2:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-2618-2-6   DOI
25 Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Huntley J, Fierer N, et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 2012;6:1621-1624. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.8   DOI