Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15324/kjcls.2019.51.4.397

EEG Recording Method for Quantitative Analysis  

Heo, Jaeseok (The Graduate School, Yonsei University Graduate Program in Cognitive Science)
Chung, Kyungmi (Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Clinical Laboratory Science / v.51, no.4, 2019 , pp. 397-405 More about this Journal
Abstract
Quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) has been widely used in research and clinical fields. QEEG has been widely used to objectively document cerebral changes for the purpose of identifying the electrophysiological biomarkers across various clinical symptoms and for the stimulation of specific cortical regions associated with cognitive function. In electroencephalography (EEG), the difference in quantitative and qualitative analyses is discriminated not by its measurement methods and relevant clinical or research environments, but by its analysis methods. When performing a qualitative analysis, it is possible for a medical technologist or experienced researchers to read the EEG waveforms to exclude artifacts. However, the quantitative analysis is still based on mathematical modeling, and all EEG data are included for the analysis, leading the results to be affected by unexpected artifacts. In the hospital setting, the case that the medical technologists in charge of the EEG test perform academic research has been little reported, compared to other clinical physiological measurement-based research. This is because there are few laboratories specialized in clinical physiological research. In this respect, this study is expected to be utilized as a basic reference material for medical technologists, students, and academic researchers, all of whom would like to conduct a quantitative analysis.
Keywords
Clinical physiologic testing; Electroencephalography; Quantitative electroencephalography;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim SH, Park SK, Baek JS, Kim KK, Kim KE, Lee YJ. Evoked potentials before the intractable epilepsy surgery Korean J Clin Lab Sci. 2019;51:198-204.   DOI
2 Kim KW. Updataes in intraoperative neruophysiological monitoring. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2014:258-263.   DOI
3 Cho SH. A review on the theoretical background and its application of event-related brain potnetials. Audiol Speech Res. 2011;7:10-18.   DOI
4 Park KD. Brainstem auditory evoked potential. Korean J Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;3:187-197.
5 Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage. 2010;52:1059-1069.   DOI
6 Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods. 2004;134:9-21.   DOI
7 Luck SJ. An introduction to the event-related potential technique. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2014. p185-217.
8 Chen X, Liu Q, Tao W, Li L, Lee S, Liua A, et al. ReMAE: A sser-friendly toolbox for removing Muscle artifacts from EEG. IEEE T Instrum Meas. 2019;1-15.
9 Tsuchida TN, Acharya JN, Halford JJ, Kuratani JD, Sinha SR, Stecker MM, et al. American clinical neurophysiology society: EEG guidelines introduction. J Clin Neurophysio. 2016;33:301-302.   DOI
10 Mecarelli O. Clinical electroencephalography. 1st ed. Cahm: Spinger; 2019. p91-107.
11 Bacigalupo F, Luck SJ. Lateralized suppression of alpha-band EEG activity as a mechanism of target processing. J Neurosci. 2019;39:900-917.   DOI
12 Oh JY, Cho DR, Kim JJ, Heo JS, Park JS, Na SH, et al. Changes in heart rate variability of patients with delirium in intensive care unit. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017:3118-3121.
13 Hong SB, Jung KY. Basic electrophysiology of the electroencephalography. J Korean Neurol Assoc. 2003;21:225.
14 Eun HJ. Basics of electroencephalography for neuropsychiatrist. J Koran Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 2019;58:76-104.   DOI
15 Lee GW. Clinical application of VEP. J Korean Soc Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;3:94-98.
16 Lee GW, Park KS. Application of neurophysiological studies in clinical neurology. J Korean Soc Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;1:1-9.
17 Schimer DS. Lopes da Silva FH. Niedermeyer's electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields. 7th ed. New York: USA; Oxford University. 2017.
18 Kramer MA. An introduction to field analysis techniques: the power spectrum and coherence [Internet]. Boston: Boston University Arts & Sciences; 2013 [cited 2019 Oct10]. Available from: http://math.bu.edu/people/mak/sfn-2013/sfn_tutorial.pdf.
19 McGinty R, Costello DJ, Kinirons P, McNamara B. Diagnostic yield of routine EEG in adults with active epilepsy. Ir Med J. 2019;112:851.
20 Baumgartner C, Koren JP, Rothmayer M. Automatic computer-based detection of epileptic seizures. Front Neurol. 2018;9:639.   DOI
21 Issa MF, Tuboly G, Kozmann G, Juhasz Z. Automatic ECG artefact removal from EEG signals. Meas Sci Rev. 2019;19:101-108.   DOI
22 Price J, Budzynski T. Anxiety, Introduction to quantitative EEG and neurofeedback: advanced theory and applications. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2009. p453-470.
23 Liang SF, Kuo CE, Hu YH, Pan YH, Wang YH. Automatic stage scoring of single-channel sleep EEG by using multiscale entropy and autoregressive models. IEEE T Instrum Meas. 2012;61:1649-1657.   DOI
24 Gloss D, Varma JK, Pringsheim T, Nuwer MR. Practice advisory: the utility of EEG theta/beta power ratio in ADHD diagnosis: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2016;87:2375-2379.   DOI
25 Snyder SM, Rugino TA, Hornig M, Stein MA. Integration of an EEG biomarker with a clinician's ADHD evaluation. Brain Behav. 2015;5:E00330.
26 Lenartowicz A, Loo SK. Use of EEG to diagnose ADHD. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014;16:498.   DOI
27 Thibodeau R, Jorgensen RS, Kim S. Depression, anxiety, and resting frontal EEG asymmetry: a meta-analytic review. J Abonorm Psychol. 2006;115:715.   DOI
28 Alkawadri R. Brain computer interface (BCI) applications in mapping of epileptic brain networks based on intracranial-EEG. Front Neurol. 2019;13:191.   DOI
29 Abraham A, Dutta P, editors. Emerging technologies in data mining and information security. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2018. p377-382.
30 Cook IA, O'Hara R, Uijtdehaage SH, Mandelkern M, Leuchter AF. Assessing the accuracy of topographic EEG mapping for determining local brain function. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;107:408-414.   DOI
31 Naatanen R. Attention and brain function. Behav Sci. 2018;1:516.
32 Gross J, Baillet S, Barnes GR, Henson RN, Hillebrand A, Jensen O, et al. Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. Neuroimage. 2013;65:349-363.   DOI
33 Lim SH, Park SK, Kim DJ, Baek JS, Park CW. Usefulness of direct cortical stimulation during intraoperative monitoring in patients with brain tumor near motor cortex. Korean J Clin Lab Sci. 2018;50:211-215.   DOI
34 Kim CS. Analysis of the continuous monitored electroencephalogram patterns in intensive care unit. Korean J Clin Lab Sci. 2017;49:294-299.   DOI
35 Keil A, Debener S, Gratton G, Junghofer M, Kappenman ES, Luck SJ, et al. Committee report: publication guidelines and recommendations for studies using electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography. Psychophysiology. 2014;51:1-21.   DOI
36 Picton T, Bentin S, Berg P, Donchin E, Hillyard S, Johnson R, et al. Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology. 2000;37:127-152.   DOI
37 Ferree TC, Luu P, Russell GS, Tucker DM. Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:536-544.   DOI
38 Jerri AJ. The shannon sampling theorem-its various extensions and applications: a tutorial review. Proceeding of the IEEE. 1977;65:1565-1596.   DOI
39 Kim EH. A Study on the Effect of TV advertising models by EEG. Korean Journal of Communication Studies. 2010;18:273-299.
40 Jiang X, Bian GB, Tian ZJS. Removal of artifacts from EEG signals: a review. Sensors. 2019;19:987.   DOI
41 Chung KM, Lee D, Park JY. Involuntary attention restoration suring exposure to mobile-based $360{\circ}$virtual nature in healthy adults with different levels of restorative experience: event-related potential study. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20:E11152.   DOI