1 |
Ucakhan OO, Ozkan M, Kanpolat A, 2006. Corneal thickness measurements in normal and keratoconic eyes: Pentacam comprehensive eye scanner versus noncontact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg, 32(6):970-977.
DOI
|
2 |
Ponce CMP, Rocha KM, Smith SD, et al., 2009. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg, 35(6):1055-1062.
DOI
|
3 |
Nam SM, Im CY, Lee HK, et al. Accuracy of RTVue optical coherence tomography, Pentacam, and ultrasonic pachymetry for the measurement of central corneal thickness. Ophthalmology. 2010;117(11):2096-2103
DOI
|
4 |
Edmonds CR, Wung SF, Pemberton B, Surrett S. Comparison of anterior chamber depth of normal and keratoconus eyes using Scheimpflug photography. Eye Contact lens.2009; 35(3) : 120-122.
DOI
|
5 |
Jinabhia A, Radhakrishana H, O'Donnell C. Corneal changes after suspending contact lens wear in early pellucid marginal corneal degeneration and moderate keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens. 2011; 37(2) 99-105.
DOI
|
6 |
Kato N. Toda I, Kawakita T, Sakai C, Tsubota K. Topography-guided conductive keratoplasty : treatment for advanced keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010. 150(4):481-489.
DOI
|
7 |
Lam AK, Douthwaite WA. The corneal-thickness profile in Hong Kong Chinese. Cornea.1998; 17, 384-388.
DOI
|
8 |
Aj DAC, Vincent A, Vives P, Blasco F, Mico M. Assessment of corneal morphological changes induced by the use of daily disposable contact lenses., 2015, Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 22(38):28-33.
|
9 |
Marjanovic I, Kontic D, Hentova-sencanic P, Markovic V, Bozic M. Correlation between central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure in various age groups. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2010; 138(5-6): 279-286.
DOI
|
10 |
Yebra Pimentel E, Giraldez MJ, Arias FL, Gonzalez J, Gonzalez JM, Parafita MA, Febrero M. Rigid gas permeable contact lens and corneal topography, Ophthal Physiol Opt. 2001,21(3),236-242.
DOI
|
11 |
A. Juan, LP. Antonio, A. Luis, MS. Rahhal, MS. Franciso. Anatomic study of the corneal thickness of young emmetropic subjects 2004; 23(7): 669-673.
DOI
|
12 |
Bohnke M, Chavanne P, Gianotti R. Continuous non-contact corneal pachymetry with a high speed reflectometer. J. Refract Surg.1998; 14, 140-146.
DOI
|
13 |
Feng Y, Varikooty J, Simpson TL. Diurnal variation of corneal and corneal epithelial measured using optical coherence tomography. Cornea. 2001; 20, 480-483.
DOI
|
14 |
Florian R, Anke S, Christine B, Carl E. Age-related changes in central and peripheral corneal thickness- Determination of normal values with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea. 2007; 26(1), 1-5.
DOI
|
15 |
Williams R, Fink BA, King-Smith PE, Mitchell GL. Central corneal thickness measurements: using an ultrasonic instrument and 4 optical instruments. Cornea. 2011;30(11):1238-1243.
DOI
|
16 |
Cho P, Cheung SW. Repeatability of corneal thickness measurements made by a scanning slit topography system. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002; 22, 505-510.
DOI
|
17 |
Haque S, Simpson T, Jones L. Corneal and epithelial thickness in keratoconus : a comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry, ORBscan II, and optical coherence tomography. J Refract Surg. 2006; 22(5):486-493.
DOI
|
18 |
Al-Farhan HM, Al-Otaibi WM. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and the Artemis-2 VHF scanner in normal eyes. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012; 6:1037-104.
DOI
|
19 |
Christensen A, Narvaez J, Zimmerman G. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by ultrasound pachymetry, konan noncontact optical pachymetry, and orbscan pachymetry. Cornea. 2008;27(8):862-865.
DOI
|
20 |
Florian R, Anke S, Christine B, Carl E. Age-related changes in central and peripheral corneal thickness- Determination of normal values with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea. 2007; 26(1), 1-5.
DOI
|
21 |
Farrell RA, Hart RW. On the theory of spatial organization of micromolecules in connective tissue. Bull math Biophys 1969;31: 727-760.
DOI
|