Browse > Article

The Effect of the Transactional Leadership and Transformational Leadership on Team Empowerment and Performance  

Lee, Sung-Chul (Hoseo Graduate School of Venture, Hoseo University)
Kim, Hong (Hoseo Graduate School of Global Enterpreneurship, Hoseo University)
Publication Information
Fashion & Textile Research Journal / v.10, no.6, 2008 , pp. 936-946 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze whether transactional leadership and transformational leadership have an effect on team empowerment and performance. To this end, a survey was conducted from August 1 to 30 in 2008, among team members of fashion companies. The data was collected with 586 subjects, the statistical analysis methods were frequency analysis, reliability analysis, factor analysis and multiple regression analysis. The results of this study were as follows; First, contingent reward of transactional leadership had an effect on team empowerment factors and team performance factors. Second, charisma, individualized consideration and intellectual stimulation of transformational leadership had an effect on team empowerment factors and team performance factors. Third, team potency, team autonomy and team meaning of team empowerment had an effect on team performance factors.
Keywords
transactional leadership; transformational leadership; team empowerment; team performance;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 김성동. (2004). 리더십 유형이 집단적, 개별적 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 호텔조직을 중심으로. 경기대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
2 임창희, 가재산. (1999). 한국형 팀제. 서울: 삼성경제연구소, p. 18
3 Alper, S., josvold, D., & Law, K. S. (1998). Interdependence and Controversy in Group Decision Making : Antecedents to Effective Self-managing Teams, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 33-52   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. A. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization, Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39   DOI
5 Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (1985). Transformational leadership, charisma and beyond. School of Management, SUNT at Binghamton, Working paper
6 Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy : The exercise of control. New York: Freeman
7 Keller, T., & Dansereau, F. (1995). Leadership and empowerment : a social exchange perceptive, Human Relations, 48(2), 127-145   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Steers, R. M. (1975). Problems in the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 546-558   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Dunnette, M. D., & Hough, L. M. (1992). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Palo Alto. CA: Consulting Psychology Press
10 Smith, K., Gregory, S. R., & Cannon, D. (1996). Becoming Employer of Choice : Assessing Commitment in the Hospitality Workplace, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 18(6), 3-9
11 Thomas, K. W., & Velthous, B. A. (1990). Cognitive element's of empowerment an interpretive model of intrisic task motivation, Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 669-683
12 Puffer, S. M. (1987). Prosocial behavior, noncompliant behavior, and work performance among commission salespeople, Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 615-621   DOI
13 Dalton, D. R., Todor, W. D., Spendolini, M. J., Fielding, G. J., & Portor, L. W. (1980). Organizational Structure and Performance : A Critical Review, Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 49-63
14 Frayne, C. A., & Latham, G. P. (1989). The Application of Social Learning Theory to Employee Self-Management and Attendance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 411-416   DOI
15 Gist, M. E., Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). The Effects of Alternative Training Methods on Self-Efficacy and Performance in Computer Software Training, Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(6), 884-891   DOI
16 양병선. (2002). 여행사의 팀조직 특성과 팀 임파워먼트에 관한 연구. 세종대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
17 Barling, J., Weber, T., & Kelloway, E. K. (1996). Effects of Transformational Leadership Training on Attitudinal and Financial Outcomes : A Field Experiment, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(6), 827-832   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Bass, B, M. (1985). Leadership : Good, Better, Best, Organizational Dynamics, 13, 26-40   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Kirkmam, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond Self-Management : Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment, Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M., & Rich, G. A. (2001). Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Salesperson Performance, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 29(2), 115-134   DOI   ScienceOn
21 최수일. (2006). 리더십과 권력이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 호서대학교 벤처전문대학원 박사학위논문
22 박주현. (2006). 패션기업 종사자의 인구통계적 특성과 근무여건 및 만족도에 관한 연구. 경성대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
23 박배후. (2006). 변혁적 거래적 리더십의 하위요인들이 조직유효성에 미치는 영향 : 팀임파워먼트의 조절효과를 중심으로. 인하대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
24 이덕로. (1994). 변혁적 거래적 리더십이 부하의 추가 노력, 직무 만족 및 조직 몰입에 미치는 영향. 인사관리연구, 18(2), 217-239
25 이준호. (2000). 팀조직환경요인과 팀임파워먼트의 조직유효성간의 관계에 관한 연구 : 한국 대기업의 다기능팀을 중심으로. 서강대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
26 Yukl, G. (2005). Leadership in Organizations (6th ed.). NJ : Prentice-Hall
27 김영진. (2000). 관광호텔 지배인의 리더십 유형이 자긍심과 직무성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 조선대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
28 Bass, B. M. (1990). Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership : Theory, Research and Managerial Applications (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press
29 Yammarino, F. J., Spangler, W. D., & Bass, B. M. (1993). Transformational Leadership and Performance : A Longitudinal Investigation, Leadership Quarterly, 4(1), 147-162
30 Howell, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1993). Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Locus of Control, and Support for Innovation : Key Predictors of Consolidated Business Unit Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 891-902   DOI   ScienceOn
31 김홍, 안동수. (2006). 팀제가 팀 임파워먼트에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : KBS 팀제를 중심으로. 벤처창업연구, 1(1), 53-70
32 Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The Empowerment Process : Integrating Theory and Practice, Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482   DOI
33 Schermerhorn, J. R. (1996). Essentials of Management and Organizational Behavior. New York: John Wiley and Sons