Browse > Article

The Study on the Perceived Risk and Product Innovativeness Evaluation of Smart Clothing  

Kang, Keang-Young (Dept. of Fashion, Hoseo University)
Jin, Hyun-Jeong (Dept. of Fashion Design, Yuhan College)
Publication Information
Fashion & Textile Research Journal / v.10, no.5, 2008 , pp. 618-624 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purposes of this study were to explore the perceived risk of smart clothing, to classify consumers by risk perception of smart clothing, and to investigate the differences among the segmented groups in regard to the evaluation of newness and innovativeness of smart clothing. In addition, the relationship among perceived risk, evaluation of newness and innovativeness of smart clothing were examined. A questionnaire was administered to 338 male and female subjects aged from 17 to 50. Analysis was performed by factor analysis, cluster analysis, ANOVA, and Pearson's correlation analysis. The results showed that the perceived risk of smart clothing was composed of 4 factors: economic risk, social risk, functional risk and physical risk. Consumers were classified into four groups: high risk perception group, low economic risk perception group, low functional risk perception group, and low social risk perception group. ANOVA showed that there were significant differences among four groups regard to the evaluation of newness and innovativeness of smart clothing. High risk perception group most highly evaluated the newness and innovativeness of smart clothing. There were positive correlation among the perceived risks, the evaluation of the newness and innovativeness of smart clothing.
Keywords
product innovativeness; newness; perceived risk; smart clothing;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김종배. (1992). 신제품 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 실증적 연구. 마케팅 연구, 7(1), 121-145
2 손미숙, 박준석, 한동원, 조일연. (2006). 웨어러블 시스템 사용자 상 호작용 시장 분석 및 기술 동향. 전자통신동향분석, 21(2), 184-191
3 이규혜, 최자영. (2007). 패션 제품 온라인 쇼핑 시 지각되는 위험과 구매 의도의 관계에 있어서 태도의 역할. 복식문화연구, 15(3), 472-482
4 조길수, 김주영, 김화연, 이명은, 이선. (2000). 디지털 의복. 섬유기술과 산업, 4(1), 148-157
5 Bass, F. M. (1980). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science 15, 215-227
6 Blythe, J. (1999). Innovativeness and newness in high-tech consumer durables. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8(5), 415-429   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Chattopadhyay, A., & Basu, K. (1990). Humor in advertising: The moderating role of prior brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 466-476   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Engle, J. F., & Blackwell, R. D. (1982). Consumer Behavior(4th ed.). Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press. pp. 321-326
9 Goldenberg, J., Lehmann, D. R., & Mazursky, D. (2001). The idea itself and the circumstances of its emergence as predictors of new product success. Management Science, 47, 69-84   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Gourville, J. T. (2006). Eager sellers and stony buyers. Harvard Business Review, 27-37
11 Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. (1972). The components of perceived risk. In M. Venkatesan (Ed.) Proceedings from 3rd Annual Conference (pp. 382-393). Association for Consumer Research
12 Veryzer, R. W. Jr. (1998). Key factors affecting customer evaluation of discontinuous new products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 136-150   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Sheth, J. N. (1981). Psychology of innovation resistance: The less developed concept(LDC) in diffusion research. In J. N. Sheth (Ed.) Research in Marketing (pp.273-292). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press Inc
14 Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. In R. S. Hancock (Ed.) Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World, Proceeding of the 43th Conference of the American Marketing Association (pp. 390). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association
15 강경영, 진현정. (2007). 스마트 의류 newness와 혁신성 평가. 한국의류산업학회지, 9(5), 493-499
16 유재미, 김상훈, 이유재. (2006). 제품혁신성 지각의 결정요인과 제품 수용의향과의 관계: 소비자 관점을 중심으로. 마케팅 연구, 21(2), 27-52
17 Horsky, D. (1990). A diffusion model incorporating product benefits price, income, and information. Marketing Science, 9, 342-365   DOI   ScienceOn
18 유필화, 이승희. (1994). 신제품수용시 소비자의 혁신저항에 관한 연 구: 혁신저항모형을 중심으로. 경영학연구, 23(3), 217-249
19 박재진. (2004). 소비자 혁신성이 온라인쇼핑 행동에 미치는 영향: 혁 신기술수용모델을 중심으로. 광고연구, 63, 79-101
20 Karni, E. (1985). Increasing risk with state-dependent preferences. Journal of Economic Theory, 35(1), 172   DOI
21 최홍석. (2001). 전자상거래 특성이 지각된 위험 및 구매의도에 미치 는 영향에 관한 연구: 인터넷 쇼핑몰을 중심으로. 영남대학교 경 영대학원 석사학위 논문
22 차세대 컴퓨팅 산업협회. (2006). 2005년도 차세대 PC산업 실태조사 . 자료검색일 2007, 10. 12, 자료출처 http://www.anci.or.kr
23 황영미, 이정란. (2006). 스마트 의류 개발을 위한 소비자 선호도 조 사: 연령별 비교를 중심으로. 패션비지니스학회지, 10(4), 130-139
24 최선윤, 이정란. (2006). 스마트 의류 개발과 활용을 위한 소비자 인 식 조사. 한국의류산업학회지, 8(4), 420-426
25 Henard, D. H., & Szymanski, D. M. (2001). Why some new products are more successful than others. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 362-375   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Kleinschmidt, E. J., & Cooper, R. G. (1991). The impact of product innovativeness on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 8, 240-251   DOI
27 Lawton, L., & Parasuraman, A. (1980). The impact of the marketing concept on new product planning. Journal of Marketing, 44, 19-25   DOI   ScienceOn
28 조길수, 조자영. (2007). 미래 일상생활용 스마트 의류 기술 개발. 섬유기술과 산업, 11(2), 111-118
29 옥선경, 이은영. (1986). 의복 구매시 인지되는 위험 유형과 정보원 활용과의 관계. 한국의류학회, 10(3), 49-61
30 Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980). Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision process: A product analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 7, 243-248
31 김찬주. (1991). 의복구매시 소비자가 지각하는 위험에 관한 연구 I: 위험의 유형분류, 소비자 인구변인과의 관련을 중심으로. 한국의류학회지, 15(4), 405-416
32 Ram, S. (1987). A model of innovation resistance. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 208-218
33 허경옥. (2003). 소비자 위험인지가 소비자 만족도에 미치는 영향: 이 동전화 사용을 중심으로. 마케팅과학연구, 11, 165-181
34 Wearable computer market to grow 500% by '06. (2003, March 14). Venture Development Cooperation. Retrieved June 23, 2006, from http://vdc-corp.com
35 박선형, 이주현. (2001). 웨어러블 컴퓨터(wearable computer) 개념을 기초로 한 디지털 패션 상품의 디자인 가능성 탐구 1. 패션비지니스학회지, 5(3), 111-128
36 이정순. (2002). 스마트 의복의 전망 및 개발사례 연구. 충남생활과학연구지, 15, 64-75
37 Johannessen, J., Olsen, B., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2001). Innovation as newness: what is new, how new, and new to whom? European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 20-31   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Prasad, V. K. (1975). Socioeconomic product risk and patronage preferences of retail shoppers. Journal of Marketing, 39(3), 42-47   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Tanawat, H., & Audhesh, P. K. (2006). Consumer innovativeness and perceived risk: Implications for high technology product adoption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 182-198   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Admit, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversation in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3), 291-295   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Holak, S. Lehmann, D. R., & Sultan, F. (1987). The role of expectations in the adoption of innovative consumer durables: Some preliminary evidence. Journal of Retailing, 63, 243-259