Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2022.10.3.149

Enhancing Inoculation in the Spiral of Silence to Promote Resistance to Attacks: Examining Public Opinion on Taiwan-PRC Relations  

Lin, Wayne Wei Kuo (Fu-Jen Catholic University)
Publication Information
Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research / v.10, no.3, 2022 , pp. 149-177 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study analyzes how inoculation affects the spiral of silence. Inoculation could be a beneficial tool in a democracy as it elevates citizens' resistance to attitude change "forced" by "the winning opinion" in the spiral of silence on a certain controversial issue. The study examines essential variables combined with the theories of inoculation and spiral of silence, such as resistance to counter-attitudinal attack, fear of isolation, and issue-involvement. A two-wave field experiment was employed to assess the formation of public opinion on Taiwan's political future with the People's Republic of China. Results support that inoculation enhanced people's resistance to attitude change and decreased their fear of isolation. Individuals who are more issue-involved were also shown to be more affected by inoculation, which allowed them to resist attitude change. The decreased fear of isolation, coupled with more issue involvement, might elevate people's willingness to speak out in public. More political discussions regarding an important public issue might be expected in a democracy.
Keywords
inoculation; spiral of silence; public opinion; international communication; Taiwan-PRC relations;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Pfau, M., & Van Bockern, S. (1994). The persistence of inoculation in conferring resistance to smoking initiation among adolescents: The second year. Human Communication Research, 20, 413-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00329.x   DOI
2 Pfau, M., Kenski, H. C., Nitz, M., & Sorenson, J. (1990). Efficacy of inoculation strategies in promoting resistance to political attack messages: Application to direct mail. Communication Monographs, 57, 25-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759009376183   DOI
3 Pfau, M., Tusing, K. J., Koerner, A. F., Lee, W., Godbold, L. C., Penaloza, L. J., Yang, V. S. H., & Hong, Y. H. (1997). Enriching the inoculation construct: The role of critical components in the process of resistance. Human Communication Research, 24, 187-215.   DOI
4 Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgement-involvement approach. Saunders.
5 Sun, H. (1991). A test of the spiral of silence theory in Taiwan [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison].
6 Druckman, J. N. & McGrath, M. C. (2019). The evidence for motivated reasoning in climate change preference formation. Nature Clim Change, 9, 111-119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1   DOI
7 Election Study Center. (2021). Trends of core political attitudes: Taiwan independence vs. unification with the mainland. National Chengchi University, Taipei. https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/PageDoc/Detail?fid=7805&id=6962
8 Huang, H. (1997). Testing the spiral of silence theory: From a cross-cultural perspective [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison].
9 Garrett, R. K., Carnahan, D. & Lynch, E. K. (2013). A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004-2008. Political Behavior, 35, 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9185-6   DOI
10 Lee, W. (1997). Effects of cognitive and affective inoculation appeals in conferring resistance against cognitive and affective attacks [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison].
11 McDevitt, M. (2003). Spiral of moderation: Opinion expression in computer-mediated discussion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 15(4), 454-470. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/15.4.454   DOI
12 Mitchelstein, E. (2015). Information, interest and indifference: Structural and contingent reasons for engagement during a presidential campaign [Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University].
13 Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence (1st ed.). University of Chicago Press.
14 Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer-Verlag.
15 Ivanov, B., Miller, C. H., Compton, J., Averbeck, J. M., Harrison, K. J., Sims, J, D., Parker, K. A., & Parker, J. L. (2012). Effects of postinoculation talk on resistance to influence. Journal Communication, 62(4), 701-718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01658.x   DOI
16 Lin, W.K. (2005). Inoculation to resist attacks. Asian Journal of Communication, 15, 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/0129298042000329810   DOI
17 Pfau, M. (1997). The inoculation model of resistance to influence. In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 133-171). Ablex.
18 Pfau, M., Van Bockern, S., & Kang, J. G. (1992). Use of inoculation to promote resistance to smoking initiation among adolescents. Communication Monographs, 59, 213-230. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376266   DOI
19 Pfau, M., Banas, J., Semmler, S. M., Deatrick, L., Lane, L., Mason, A., Craig, E., Nisbett, G., & Underhill, J. (2010). Role and impact of involvement and enhanced threat in resistance. Communication Quarterly, 58(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370903520307   DOI
20 Lin, W.K. & Pfau, M. (2007). Can inoculation work against the spiral of silence? A study of public opinion on the future of Taiwan. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edl030   DOI
21 McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 191-229). Academic Press.
22 Miller, G. R., & Burgoon, M. (1973). New techniques of persuasion. Harper & Row.
23 Neuwirth, K. J. (1995). Testing the "spiral of silence" model: The case of Mexico [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison].
24 Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24, 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x   DOI
25 Noelle-Neumann, E. (1993). The spiral of silence: Public opinion-our social skin (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.
26 Papageorgis, D., & McGuire, W.J. (1961). The generality of immunity to persuasion produced by pre-exposure to weakened counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 475-481. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048430   DOI
27 Pfau, M. (1992). The potential of inoculation in promoting resistance to the effectiveness of comparative advertising messages. Communication Quarterly, 40, 26-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369818   DOI
28 Compton, J. (2013). Inoculation theory. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), Sage handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 220-237). Sage.
29 Banas, J.A., & Rains, S.A. (2010). A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs, 77(3), 281-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751003758193   DOI
30 Burgoon, M., Miller, M.D., Cohen, M., & Montgomery, C. L. (1978). An empirical test of a model of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 5, 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00620.x   DOI
31 Compton, J., & Pfau, M. (2009). Spreading inoculation: Inoculation, resistance to influence, and word-of-mouth communication. Communication Theory, 19(1), 9-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01330.x   DOI
32 Darwin, C. (1873). The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Murray.
33 Becker, S.W., Bavelas, A., & Braden, M. (1961). An index to measure contingency of English sentences. Language and Speech, 4, 138-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383096100400301   DOI
34 Compton, J., & Pfau, M. (2004). Use of inoculation to foster resistance to credit card marketing targeting college students. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32(4), 343-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/0090988042000276014   DOI
35 Pfau, M., Park, D., Holbert, R. L., & Cho, J. (2001). The effects of party- and PACsponsored issue advertising and the potential of inoculation to combat its impact on the democratic process. American Behavioral Scientist, 44 (12), 2379-2397. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121958384   DOI
36 Soroya, S. H., Farooq, A., Mahmood, K., Isoaho, J., & Zara, S. E. (2021). From information seeking to information avoidance: Understanding the health information behavior during a global health crisis. Information processing & management, 58(2), 102440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102440   DOI
37 Pfau, M., Compton, J., Parker, K. A., An, C., Wittenberg, E. M., Ferguson, M., Horton, H., & Malyshev, Y. (2006). The conundrum of the timing of counterarguing effects in resistance: Strategies to boost the persistence of counterarguing output. Communication Quarterly, 54(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370600650845   DOI
38 Pfau, M., Tusing, K. J., Lee, W., Godbold, L. C., Koerner, A. F., Penaloza, L. J., Hong, Y. H., & Yang, V. S. H. (1997). Nuances in inoculation: The role of inoculation approach, ego-involvement, and message processing disposition in resistance. Communication Quarterly, 15, 91-111.
39 Salmon, C. T., & Neuwirth, K. (1990). Perceptions of opinion "climates" and willingness to discuss the issue of abortion. Journalism Quarterly, 67, 567-577. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909006700312   DOI
40 Strickland, A. A., Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2011). Motivated reasoning and public opinion. Journal of health politics, policy and law, 36(6), 935-944. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-1460524   DOI
41 Taylor, B. (2018). The four flashpoints: How Asia goes to war. La Trobe University Press.
42 Zimbardo, P.G. (1960). Involvement and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040786   DOI
43 Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
44 Pfau, M., & Burgoon, M. (1988). Inoculation in political campaign communication. Human Communication Research, 15, 91-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1988.tb00172.x   DOI