Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2020.8.4.432

Roles of Malaysian Online Newspapers in the Construction of Public Opinion on Rare Earth Risks  

Hasan, Nik Norma Nik (Universiti Sains)
Dauda, Sharafa (University of Maiduguri)
Publication Information
Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research / v.8, no.4, 2020 , pp. 432-452 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study explored the representation of risks from the controversial Lynas rare earth refining as a risk event by five Malaysian online mainstream and alternative newspapers using qualitative content analysis. The aim is to uncover the role of the news media in the social amplification and attenuation of risks within the literature evidence as those roles are still uncertain. Content analysis is used to explore the online newspapers' roles guided by the Social Amplification of Risk Framework (SARF). The representations typified environmental, financial, health, occupational, property, radioactive, and technological risks and established connections between four risk types (environmental, financial, radioactive, and health risks). Radioactive risk was repeatedly associated with other risks, suggesting that the volume and information flow focused on radioactive risk as a key ingredient for amplification. This connection shows that the nature of the relationship between risks is multidimensional, contradicting the unidirectional type found in previous studies. Alternative online newspapers amplified and attenuated more risks, thus, providing more diverse coverage than mainstream sources. Consequently, this study provides evidence that risk representation from rare earth refining in a digital news environment is multidimensional and intensified or weakened in a multi-layered pattern. The stakeholders are engaged in a contestation by positioning their narratives to oppose or support their interests, which are amplified or attenuated by the online newspapers as social amplification stations.
Keywords
risk representations; online newspapers; Lynas; public opinion; human health; Malaysia;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Amberg, S. M., & Hall, T. E. (2008). Communicating risks and benefits of aquaculture: A content analysis of US newsprint representations of farmed salmon. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 39(2), 143-157. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2008.00160.x   DOI
2 Sandman, P. M. (1986). Explaining Environmental Risk (Conflict Research Consortium BOOK SUMMARY). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Toxic Substances. https://www.beyondintractability.org/bksum/sandmanexplaining
3 Slovic, P. (2016). Understanding perceived risk: 1978-2015. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 58(1), 25-29. https:/doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2016.1112169   DOI
4 Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569   DOI
5 Stern, P. C., & Fineberg, H. V. (Eds.). (1996). Understanding risk: Informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academies Press.
6 Strauss, A. A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press.
7 Sualman, I., Jaafar, R., & Salbiah, L. (2017). News framing Lynas plant project: A study of five Malaysian newspapers. Advanced Science Letters, 23(1), 304-307. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2017.7166   DOI
8 Raupp, J. (2014). Social agents and news media as risk amplifiers: A case study on the public debate about the E. coli outbreak in Germany 2011. Health, risk & society, 16(6), 565-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2014.950203   DOI
9 Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 81-110). Sage.
10 Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute digital news report 2017. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital News Report 2017 web_0.pdf
11 Dunwoody, S., & Peters, H. P. (1992). Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks: A survey of research in the United States and Germany. Public Understanding of Science, 1(2), 199-230. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/1/2/004   DOI
12 Hove, T., Paek, H.-J., Yun, M., & Jwa, B. (2015). How newspapers represent environmental risk: The case of carcinogenic hazards in South Korea. Journal of Risk Research, 18(10), 1320-1336.. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.923025   DOI
13 Illing, P. (2001). Toxicity and risk: Context, principles and practice. Taylor & Francis.
14 Kasperson, R. E., Renn, O., Slovic, P., Brown, H. S., Emel, J., Goble, R., Kasperson, J. X., & Ratick, S. (1988). The social amplification of risk: A conceptual framework. Risk Analysis, 8(2), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x   DOI
15 Kiranjit, K. (2015). Social media creating digital environmental publics: Case of Lynas Malaysia. Public Relations Review, 41(2), 311-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.12.005   DOI
16 Kamrin, M. A., Katz, D. J., & Walter, M. L. (1995). Reporting on risk: A journalist's handbook on environmental risk assessment. Foundation for American Communications and National Sea Grant College Program.
17 ASM, & NPC. (2011). Rare earth industries: Moving Malaysia's green economy forward. The Academy of Sciences Malaysia (ASM) and the National Professors' Council (NPC).
18 Tengku Ismail, T. H., Juahir, H., Aris, A. Z., Zain, S. M., & Samah, A. A. (2016). Local community acceptance of the rare earth industry: The case of the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (LAMP) in Malaysia. Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 18(3), 739-762. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9675-5   DOI
19 Metag, J., & Marcinkowski, F. (2014). Technophobia towards emerging technologies? A comparative analysis of the media coverage of nanotechnology in Austria, Switzerland and Germany. Journalism, 15(4), 463-481. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913491045   DOI
20 Zhang, L., & Zhong, L. (2010). Integrating and prioritizing environmental risks in China's risk management discourse. Journal of Contemporary China, 19(63), 119-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560903335835   DOI
21 Kasperson, R. E. (2012). A perspective on the social amplifications of risk. The Bridge, 42(3), 23-27. https://nae.edu/Publications/Bridge/62556/62566.aspx
22 Kasperson, R. E. (2018). Social amplification of risk and extreme events. In V. M. Bier (Ed.), Risk in Extreme Environments: Preparing, Avoiding, Mitigating, and Managing. Routledge. https://books.google.com.my/books?hl=en&lr=&id=l5Y6DwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT182&ots=kJ9G807yYJ&sig=x6wukA1QwsfG5K7xsihqH_A4N_8#v=onepage&q&f=false
23 Lofland, J., Snow, D. A., Anderson, L., & Lofland, L. H. (2006). Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth/Thomson.
24 Martin, B. (1996). Technological vulnerability. Technology in Society, 18(4), 511-523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-791X(96)00029-2   DOI
25 Kitzinger, J., & Reilly, J. (1997). The rise and fall of risk reporting: Media coverage of human genetics research, 'false memory syndrome' and 'mad cow disease.' European Journal of Communication, 12(3), 319-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323197012003002   DOI
26 Mustafa, K. A. (2012). Reporting the environment: Human rights, development and journalism in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 22(2), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365x13498172   DOI
27 Ng, E. (2014, September 3). Lynas gets full operating licence before TOL expiry date. The Malaysian Insider. http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/lynas-gets-fulloperating-licence-before-tol-expiry-date
28 Nielsen Consumer and Media View. (2018, April 17). State of the media - The Malaysian media landscape in 2017. http://www.nielsen.com/my/en/insights/reports/2018/state-of-the-media-malaysian-media-landscape-2017.html
29 Nik Norma, N. H., Nur 'Izzah', A. M. N., Narul Salmi, A. L., & Muhamad Saifudin, M. S. (2018). Understanding risk perceptions of youths on the Lynas projects: A socio-cultural outlook. In R. S. Zinaida (Ed.), Communication for social change, sport, environment and politic. ASPIKOM.
30 Nik Norma, N. H. (2015). Climate change and the risk messages of environment: A visual social semiotics analysis of the Malaysian and German online newspapers. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Media, Communication and Culture (ICMCC 2015), Vistana Hotel, Penang.
31 Phua, K. L.(2016). Rare earth plant in Malaysia: Governance, green politics, and geopolitics. Southeast Asian Studies, 5(3), 443-462. doi.10.20495/seas.5.3_443   DOI
32 AELB (2020). Maklumat LYNAS [About Lynas]. https://www.aelb.gov.my/malay/awam-maklumat-lynas.asp
33 Pidgeon, N., & Barnett, J. (2013). Chalara and the social amplification of risk. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/200394/pb13909-chalara-social-amplification-risk.pdf
34 Ardevol-Abreu, A. (2015). Framing theory in communication research in Spain. Origins, development and current situation. Revista Latina de Comunicacion Social, 70, 423-450. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2015-1053en   DOI