Browse > Article

Effectiveness of Microsatellite Markers for Parentage Analysis of Giant Grouper (Epinephelus lanceolatus) Broodstock  

Kim, Keun-Sik (East Sea Research Institute, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology)
Noh, Choong Hwan (East Sea Research Institute, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology)
Sade, Ahemad (Department of Fisheries, Sabah, Wisma Pertanian Sabah)
Bang, In-Chul (Department of Life Science and Biotechnology, Soonchunhyang University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Ichthyology / v.27, no.1, 2015 , pp. 10-15 More about this Journal
Abstract
Giant grouper (Epinephelus lanceolatus) is a endangered species considered as a vulnerable grade-organism in the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) red list. As a fundamental baseline study for establishing a giant grouper broodstock management system, the efficiency for parentage analysis was evaluated by using microsatellite makers previously available in this species. The eight microsatellites generated a total 52 alleles from 32 individuals, the mean expected heterozygosity was 0.663, and mean inbreeding coefficient was 0.011, consequently suggesting that the present broodstock has retained the high level of genetic diversity. However, our analysis also recommended the collection of more broodfish for more stable brood line, since the estimated value of the effective population size was proven to be 35. The average probability of identity was $6.85{\times}10^{-11}$. NE-2P and NE-PP of paternity non-exclusion probabilities were 0.00835 and 0.00027, respectively. As the result of principle coordinate analysis, the genotype of broodstock was not overlapped, suggesting that the management system of giant grouper based on eight selected microsatellite markers might be effective, although further validation with extended number of broodfish might also be needed in future. Data of present study could be a useful basis to avoid the unwanted selection of broodfish that possess close genetic relationship with current broodstock, and consequently to establish effective broodstock management system allowing the production of progeny with high genetic diversity.
Keywords
Giant grouper; Epinephelus lanceolatus; broodstock management; microsatellite marker; parentage analysis;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Allendort, F.W., G. Luikart and S.N. Aitken. 2013. Conservation and the Genetics of Populations. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.
2 Ayres, K.L. and A.D.J. Overall. 2004. API-CALC 1.0: a computer program for calculating the average probability of identity allowing for substructure, inbreeding and the presence of close relatives. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 4: 315-318.   DOI
3 Beacham, T.D., M. Lapointe, J.R. Candy, K.M. Miller and R.E. Withler. 2004. DNA in action: rapid application of DNA variation to sockeye salmon fisheries management. Conserv. Gen., 5: 411-416.   DOI
4 Bean, K., B.D. Mapstone, C.R. Davies, C.D. Murchie and A.J. Williams. 2003. Gonad development and evidence of protogyny in the red-throat emperor on the Great Barrier Reef. J. Fish Biol., 62: 299-310.   DOI
5 Boudry, P., B. Collet, F. Cornette, V. Hervouet and F. Bonhomme. 2002. High variance in reproductive success of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas, Thunberg) revealed by microsatellite-based parentage analysis of multifactorial crosses. Aquacult., 204: 283-296.   DOI
6 DeWoody, J.A. and J.C. Avise. 2000. Microsatellite variation in marine, freshwater and anadromous fishes compared with other animals. J. Fish Biol., 56: 461-473.   DOI
7 Evans, B., J. Bartlett, N. Sweijd, P. Cook and N.G. Elliott. 2004. Loss of genetic variation at microsatellite loci in hatchery produced abalone in Australia (Haliotis rubra) and South Africa (Haliotis midae). Aquacult., 233: 109-127.   DOI
8 Frankham, R., J.D. Ballow and D.A. Briscoe. 2004. A primer of conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
9 Franklin, I.R. 1980. Evolutionary change in small populations. In: Soule, M.E. and B.A. Wilcox (eds.), Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary Ecological Perspective. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
10 Froese, R. and D. Pauly. (eds.). 2014. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org (version 02/2014).
11 Heemstra, P.C. and J.E. Randall. 1993. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 16. Groupers of the world (family Serranidae, subfamily Epinephelinae). An annotated and illustrated catalogue of the grouper, rockcod, hind, coral grouper and lyretail species known to date. FAO Fish. Synop., 125: 382 p.
12 Jarne, P. and P.J.G. Lagoda. 1996. Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. Trends Ecol. Evol., 11: 424-429.   DOI
13 Koedprang, W., U. Na-Nakorn, M. Nakajima and N. Taniguchi. 2007. Evaluation of genetic diversity of eight grouper species Epinephelus spp. based on microsatellite variations. Fish. Sci., 73: 227-236.   DOI
14 Koljonen, M.L., J. Tähtinen, M. Säisä and J. Koskiniemi. 2002. Maintenance of genetic diversity of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) by captive breeding programmes and the geographic distribution of microsatellite variation. Aquacult., 212: 69-92.   DOI
15 Kuo, H.C., H.H. Hsu, C.S. Chua, T.Y. Wang, Y.M. Chen and T.Y. Chen. 2014. Development of pedigree classification using microsatellite and mitochondrial markers for giant grouper broodstock (Epinephelus lanceolatus) management in Taiwan. Mar. Drugs, 12: 2397-2407.   DOI
16 Liu, Z.J. and J.F. Cordes. 2004. DNA marker technologies and their applications in aquaculture genetics. Aquacult., 238: 1-37.   DOI
17 Li, Q., C. Park, T. Endo and A. Kijima. 2004. Loss of genetic variation at microsatellite loci in hatchery strains of the Pacific abalone (Haliotis discus hannai). Aquacult., 235: 207-222.   DOI
18 Li, Q., H. Yu and R. Yu. 2006. Genetic variability assessed by microsatellites in cultured populations of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in China. Aquacult., 259: 95-102.   DOI
19 Liu, Z. 2011. Genomic variations and marker technologies for genome-based selection. In: Liu, Z. (ed.), Next Generation Sequencing and Whole Genome Selection in Aquaculture. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, U.K.
20 Marshall, T.C., J. Slate, L.E.B. Kruuk and J.M. Pemberton. 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol., 7: 639-655.   DOI
21 McConnell, S., L. Hamilton, D. Morris, D. Cook, D. Paquet, P. Bentzen and J. Wright. 1995. Isolation of salmonid microsatellite loci and their application to the population genetics of Canadian east coast stocks of Atlantic salmon. Aquacult., 137: 19-30.   DOI
22 Myoung, J.-G., C.-B. Kang, J.M. Yoo, E.K. Lee, S. Kim, C.-H. Jeong and B.-I. Kim. 2013. First record of the giant grouper Epinephelus lanceolatus (Perciformes: Serranidae: Epinephelinae) from Jeju island, South Korea. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 16: 49-52.
23 Nelson, J.S. 2006. Fishes of the World. Fourth edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 601pp.
24 Perez-Enriquez, R., M. Takagi and N. Taniguchi. 1999. Genetic variability and pedigree tracing of a hatchery-reared stock of red sea bream (Pagrus major) used for stock enhancement, based on microsatellite DNA markers. Aquacult., 173: 413-423.   DOI
25 Oh, S.R., H.C. Kang, C.H. Lee, S.W. Hur and Y.D. Lee. 2013. Sex reversal and masculinization according to growth in longtooth grouper Epinephelus bruneus. Dev. Reprod., 17: 79-85. (in Korean)   DOI
26 Palstra, F.P. and D.E. Ruzzante. 2008. Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: what can they tell us about the importance of genetic stochasticity for wild population persistence? Mol. Ecol., 17: 3428-3447.   DOI
27 Peakall, R. and P.E. Smouse. 2006. Genealex 6: Genetic analysis in excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 6: 288-295.   DOI
28 Raymond, M. and F. Rousset. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered., 86: 248-249.   DOI
29 Rudnick, J.A. and R.C. Lacy. 2008. The impact of assumptions about founder relationships on the effectiveness of captive breeding strategies. Conserv. Gen., 9: 1439-1450.   DOI
30 Schwartz, M.K., G. Luikart and R.S. Waples. 2007. Genetic monitoring as a promising tool for conservation and management. Trends Ecol. Evol., 22: 25-33.   DOI
31 Sekino, M., K. Saitoh, T. Yamada, A. Kumagai, M. Hara and Y. Yamashita. 2003. Microsatellite-based pedigree tracing in a Japanese flounder Paralichthys olivaceus hatchery strain: implications for hatchery management related to stock enhancement program. Aquacult., 221: 255-263.   DOI
32 Van Oosterhout, C., W. Hutchinson, D. Willds and P. Shipley. 2004. MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 4: 535-538.   DOI
33 Shuk Man, C. and N.W. Chuen (Grouper & Wrasse Specialist Group). 2006. Epinephelus lanceolatus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.3. . Downloaded on 27 March 2015.
34 Sunnucks, P. 2000. Efficient genetic markers for population biology. Trends Ecol. Evol., 15: 199-203.   DOI
35 Tautz, D. 1989. Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucl. Acids Res., 17: 6463-6471.   DOI
36 Wan, Q.-H., H. Wu, T. Fujihara and S.-G. Fang. 2004. Which genetic marker for which conservation genetics issue? Electrophor., 25: 2165-2176.   DOI
37 Waples, R.S. and C. Do. 2008. LDNE: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol. Ecol., 8: 753-759.   DOI
38 Yang, S., L. Wang, Y. Zhang, X.C. Liu, H.R. Lin and Z.N. Meng. 2011. Development and characterization of 32 microsatellite loci in the giant grouper Epinephelus lanceolatus (Serranidae). Genet. Mol. Res., 10: 4006-4011.   DOI
39 Zeng, H.S., S.X. Ding, J. Wang and Y.Q. Su. 2008. Characterization of eight polymorphic microsatellite loci for the giant grouper (Epinephelus lanceolatus Bloch). Mol. Ecol. Resour., 8: 805-807.   DOI