1 |
김익수∙최 윤∙이충렬∙이용주∙김병직∙김지현. 2005. 한국어류대도감. 교학사, 615pp.
|
2 |
김화선∙김유희∙조재윤∙윤길하∙하봉석. 1999. 천연산 각시붕어(Rhodeus uyekii) 혼인색의 색소 조성. 한국수산학회지, 32: 520-524
|
3 |
송호복∙권오길. 1995. 줄납자루, Acheilognathus yamatsutae Mori (Cyprinidae)의 산란 조건. 한국어류학회지, 7: 18-24.
|
4 |
안철민. 1995a 각시붕어, Rhodeus uyekii의 생식주기. 한국어류학회지, 7: 33-42.
|
5 |
안철민. 1995b 각시붕어, Rhodeus uyekii의 생식주기에 미치는 광주기와 수온의 영향. 한국어류학회지, 7: 43-55.
|
6 |
채병수. 2001. 각시붕어, Rhodeus uyekii의 (Pisces: Cyprinidae)의 산란관의 신장. 한국어류학회지, 13: 111-116.
|
7 |
Agbali, M., M. Reichard, A. Bryjova, J. Bryja and C. Smith. 2010. Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits correlate with MHC dissimilarity in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus). Evolution, 64: 1683-1696.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, 624pp.
|
9 |
Akai, Y. and R. Arai. 1998. Rhodeus sinensis, a senior synonym of R. lighti and R. uyekii (Acheilognathinae, Cyprinidae). Ichthyol. Res., 45: 105-110.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Hill, G.E. and R. Montgomerie. 1994. Plumage colour signals nutritional condition in the house finch. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B., 258: 47-52.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Houde, A.E. and A.J. Torio. 1992. Effect of parasitic infection on male color pattern and female choice in guppies. Behav. Ecol., 3: 346-351.
DOI
|
12 |
Hughes, K.A., F.H. Rodd and D.N. Reznick. 2005. Genetic and environmental effects on secondary sex traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). J. Evol. Biol., 18: 35-45.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Jennions, M.D. and M. Petrie. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev., 72: 283-327.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Johnstone, R.A. 1996. Multiple display in animal communication: 'backup signals' and 'multiple messages'. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 351: 329-338.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Jordan, W.C. and M.W. Bruford. 1998. New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Heredity, 81: 127-133.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Kodric-Brown, A. 1989. Dietary carotenoids and male mating success in the guppy: an environmental component to female choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 25: 393-401.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Kirkpatrick, M. and M. Ryan. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature, 350: 33-38.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Kokko, H., R. Brooks, M.D. Jennions and J. Morley. 2003. The evolution of mate choice and mating biases. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B., 270: 653-664.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Kokko, H., M.D. Jennions and R. Brooks. 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 37: 43-66.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Mays Jr, H.L. and G.E. Hill. 2004. Choosing mates: good genes versus genes that are a good fit. Trends Ecol. Evol.,19: 554-559.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Milinski, M. and T.C.M. Bakker. 1990. Female sticklebacks use male coloration in mate choice and hence avoid parasitized males. Nature, 344: 330-333.
DOI
|
22 |
Moller, A.P. and A. Pomiankowski. 1993. Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 32: 167-176.
|
23 |
Milinski, M., S. Griffiths, K.M. Wegner, T.B.H. Reusch, A. Haas- Assenbaum and T. Boehm. 2005. Mate choice decision of stickleback females predictably modified by MHC peptide ligands. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 102: 4414-4418.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Moller, A.P. 1990. Parasites and sexual selection: Current status of the Hamilton and Zuk hypothesis. J. Evol. Biol., 3: 319-328.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Moller, A.P. 1994. Repeatability of female choice in a monogamous swallow. Anim. Behav., 47: 643-648.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Neff, B.D. and T.E. Pitcher. 2005. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes. Mol. Ecol., 14: 19-38.
|
27 |
Nicoletto, P.F. 1991. The relationship between male ornamentation and swimming performance in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 28: 365-370.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Putnam, M. 1992. A review of the nature, function, variability, and supply of pigments in salmonid fish. pp. 245-263 in N. Depauw and J. Joyce, eds. Aquaculture and the environment. European Aquaculture Society, Gent, Belgium.
|
29 |
Reichard, M., H. Liu and C. Smith. 2007. The co-evolutionary relationship between bitterling fishes and freshwater mussels: insights from interspecific comparisons. Evol. Ecol. Res., 9: 239-259.
|
30 |
Reichard, M., J. Bryja, M. Ondrackova, M. Davidova, P. Kaniewska and C. Smith. 2005. Sexual selection for male dominance reduces opportunities for female mate choice in the Europe-an bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Mol. Ecol., 14: 1533-1542.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
Reinhold, K. 2002. Modelling the evolution of female choice strategies under inbreeding conditions. Genetica, 116: 189-195.
DOI
|
32 |
Reusch, T.B.H., M.A. Haberli, P.B. Aeschlimann and M. Milinski. 2001. Female sticklebacks count alleles in a strategy of sexual selection explaining MHC polymorphism. Nature, 414: 300-302.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Suk, H.Y. and J.C. Choe. 2008. Dynamic female preference for multiple signals in Rhinogobius brunneus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 62: 945-951.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
34 |
Rowe, L. and D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B., 263: 1415-1421.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
35 |
Schiedt, K. 1989 New aspects of carotenoid metabolism in animals. In Carotenoids: chemistry and biology (ed. N.I. Krinsky, M.M. Mathews-Roth & R.F. Taylor), pp. 247-268. New York: Plenum Press.
|
36 |
Spence, R. and C. Smith. 2006. Mating preference of female zebrafish, Danio rerio, in relation to male dominance. Behav. Ecol., 17: 779-783.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
37 |
Tomkins, J.L., J. Radwan, J.S. Kotiaho and T. Tregenza. 2004. Genic capture and resolving the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol., 19: 323-328.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
38 |
Tregenza, T. and N. Wedell. 2000. Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol. Ecol., 9: 1013-1027.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
van Doorn, G.S. and F.J. Weissing. 2004. The evolution of female preferences for multiple indicators of quality. Amer. Nat., 164: 173-186.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
van Oosterhout, C., R.E. Trigg, G.R. Carvalho, A.E. Magurran, L. Hauser and P.W. Shaw. 2003. Inbreeding depression and genetic load of sexually selected traits: how the guppy lost its spots. J. Evol. Biol., 16: 273-281.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
41 |
Widemo, F. and S.A. Saeher. 1999. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol., 14: 26-31.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
42 |
Zahavi, A. 1975. Mate selection - a selection for a handicap. J. Theo. Biol., 53: 205-214.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
43 |
Zuk, M., R. Thornhill, J.D. Ligon, K. Johnson, S. Austad, S.H. Ligon, N. Thornhill and C. Costin. 1990. The role of male ornaments and courtship behavior in female mate choice of red jungle fowl. Amer. Nat., 136: 459-473.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
44 |
Candolin, U. 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol. Rev., 78: 575-595.
DOI
|
45 |
Barber, I., S. a. Arnott, V. a. Braithwaite, J. Andrew and F. a. Huntingford 2001. Indirect fitness consequences of mate choice in sticklebacks: offspring of brighter males grow slowly but resist parasitic infections. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B., 268: 71-6.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
46 |
Baube, C. 1997. Manipulations of signaling environment affect male competitive success in three-spined sticklebacks. Anim. Behav., 53: 819-833.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
47 |
Boake, C.R.B. 1989. Repeatability: its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior. Evol. Ecol., 3: 173-182.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
48 |
Casalini, M., M. Agbali, M. Reichard, M. Konecna, A. Bryjova and C. Smith. 2009. Male dominance, female mate choice, and intersexual conflict in the rose bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus). Evolution, 63: 366-376.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
49 |
Eberhard, W.G. 1996. Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, 472pp.
|
50 |
Endler, J. A. 1980. Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution, 34: 76-91.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
51 |
Fox, D. 1976. Animal Biochromes and Structural Colours. University of California Press, 433pp.
|
52 |
Godin, J-G. J. and L.A. Dugatkin. 1995. Variability and repeatability of female mating preference in the guppy. Anim. Behav., 49: 1427-1433.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
53 |
Goodwin, T.W. 1984. The biochemistry of the carotenoids: animal, vol. 2. Chapman and Hall. 224pp.
|
54 |
Grether, F.G. 2000. Carotenoid limitation and mate preference evolution: a test of the indicator hypothesis in Guppies (Poecilia reticulate). Evolution, 54: 1712-1724.
DOI
|
55 |
Griggio, M., C. Biard, D.J. Penn and H. Hoi. 2011. Female house sparrows "count on" male genes: experimental evidence for MHC-dependent mate preference in birds. BMC Evol. Biol., 11: 44.
DOI
|
56 |
Hamilton, W.D. and M. Zuk. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science, 218: 384-387.
DOI
|