Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.17820/eri.2019.6.1.069

Introduction and Application of Conceptual Framework and Assessment of Ecosystem Services in Applied Ecological Engineering  

Joo, Wooyeong (National Institute of Ecology)
Ahn, SoEun (Korea Environment Institute)
Joo, Jin Chul (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanbat National University)
Cho, Dong-Gil (Nexus Environmental Design Co.)
Bahn, Gwon Soo (K-water, Water Environmental Management Department)
Jung, Jinho (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
Hyun, Kyoung Hak (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure / v.6, no.1, 2019 , pp. 69-76 More about this Journal
Abstract
Ecosystem services are contributing to human welfare by enabling us to maintain our survival and quality of life. A metod of quantifying ecological functions is needed. We discussed the introduction and applications of ecosystem services to applied ecological engineering. The concept and assessment system of ecosystem services were applied to the economic valuation of river, the construction of blue-green-white network in urban area, ecological restoration, and integrated water management in Korea. The conceptual framework and assessment of ecosystem services can be used to promote value of ecological protection and restoration, helping stakeholders understand the benefits of ecosystems and increasing applications of the applied ecological engineering.
Keywords
Blue-green-white network; Ecological engineering; Ecological restoration; Ecosystem service; Integrated water management;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ban, Y. W. 2012. Master plan for Eco-complex Cheong-Ju City, Korea.
2 Blew, R.D. 1996. On the definition of ecosystem. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 77: 171-173.
3 CBD (the Convention on Biological Diversity). 2010. Strategy Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020. COP 10 Decision UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/2. Nagoya, Japan.
4 CBD (the Convention on Biological Diversity). 2014. Global Biodiversity Outlook 4. Montreal, Canada.
5 Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., Van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S.J., Kubiszewski, I and Turner, R.K. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 26: 152-158.   DOI
6 EU (European Commission). 2011. The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg.
7 IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services). 2018. Summary for policymakers of the assessment report on land degradation and restoration of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES secretariat, Bonn, Germany.
8 Ahn, S. and G. Kim. 2016. Economic values of freshwater ecosystem services from demand and supply perspectives. Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers 38: 580-587. (in Korean)   DOI
9 Alexander, S., Aronson, J., Whaley, O. and Lamb, D. 2016. The relationship between ecological restoration and the ecosystem services concept. Ecology and Society 21: 34.
10 Joo, W.Y., Kwon, H.S., Jang, I.Y., Bae, H.J., Jung, P.M., Bang, E.J., Kim, J.I., Kim, M.H., Kim, M.Y., Park, E. and Kim, J. 2017a. Establishment of Ecosystem Services Assessment Framework at National Level. National Institute of Korea. Seochun, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
11 Joo, W.Y., Kwon, H.S., Jang, I.Y., Bae, H.J., Jung, P.M., Bang, E.J., Kim, J.I., Kim, M.H., Kim, M.Y., Park, E. and Kim, J. 2017b. A Guideline for Korea National Ecosystem Services Assessment. National Institute of Korea. Seochun, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
12 Kim, J.-G. and Lee, W.-K. 2015. Task and curriculum contents of applied ecological engineering education. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 2: 1-11. (in Korean)   DOI
13 Kwon, H.S., Lee, J., Kim, I., Kim, S., Kim, B., Kim, H., Lee, J., Oh, H., Joo, W., Park, E. and Kim, J. 2017. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Services. National Institute of Korea. Seochun, Republic of Korea. (in Korean)
14 MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC., USA.
15 Mitsch, W.J. 1998. Ecological engineering - the 7-year itch. Ecological Engineering 10: 119-130.   DOI
16 Mitsch, W.J. 2012. What is ecological engineering? Ecological Engineering 45: 5-12.   DOI
17 Mitsch, W.J. and Jorgensen, S.E. 2003. Ecological engineering: a field whose time has come. Ecological Engineering 20: 363-377.   DOI
18 NCB-ME (Nature Conservation Bureau, Ministry of the Environment in Japan). 2016. Japan Biodiversity Outlook 2. Tokyo, Japan.
19 Odum, H.T. 1962. Man in the ecosystem. In, Proceedings of Lockwood Conference on the Suburban Forest and Ecology. Bulletin of the Connecticut Agricultural Station 652: 57-75.
20 Ouyang, Z., Zheng, H., Xiao, Y., Polasky, S., Liu, J., Xu, W., Wang, Q., Zhang, L., Xiao, Y., Rao, E., Jiang, L., Lu, F., Wang, X., Yang, G., Gong, S., Wu, B., Zeng, Y., Yang, W. and Daily, G.C. 2016. Improvements in ecosystem services from investments in natural capital. Science 352(6292): 1455-1459.   DOI
21 Park, J., Jung, J., Nam, K., Lee, A.-R. and Cho, K.-H. 2015. The current status and the improvement of ecological engineering education in South Korean universities. Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure 2: 12-21. (in Korean)   DOI
22 Pecl, G.T., Araújo, M.B., Bell, J.D., Blanchard, J., Bonebrake, T.C., Chen, I.C and Falconi, L. 2017. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: Impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355(6332): eaai9214.   DOI
23 TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB.
24 UK NEA (National Ecosystem Assessment). 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis of the Key Findings. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
25 UN (United Nations). 2015. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Document A/RES/70/1. the UN Sustainable Development Summit, New York, USA.
26 Wegner, G. and Pascual, U. 2011. Cost-benefit analysis in the context of ecosystem services for human wellbeing: A multidisciplinary critique. Global Environmental Change 21: 492-504.   DOI
27 Yu, Z., Liu, X., Zhang, J., Xu, D. and Cao, S. 2018. Evaluating the net value of ecosystem services to support ecological engineering: Framework and a case study of the Beijing Plains afforestation project. Ecological Engineering 112: 148-152.   DOI