Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e33

Proposal of a New TNM Classification for Gastric Cancer: Focusing on pN3b and Cytology-Positive (CY1) Disease  

Kim, Sa-Hong (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
Lee, Hyuk-Joon (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
Park, Ji-Hyeon (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
Choi, Jong-Ho (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
Park, Shin-Hoo (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
Choe, Hwi-Nyeong (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
Oh, Seung-Young (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
Suh, Yun-Suhk (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
Kong, Seong-Ho (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
Park, Do-Joong (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
Yang, Han-Kwang (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of Gastric Cancer / v.19, no.3, 2019 , pp. 329-343 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Gastric cancer with lymph node metastasis (LNM) more than 15 (N3b) was defined as stage IV until the 6th AJCC system. However, it has been reclassified as a localized disease (stage IIb or III) since the 7th system. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the survival of N3b is comparable to cytology-only positive (CY1-only) stage IV and to propose a new TNM system interpreting N3b as an eligibility criterion for receiving more intensive chemotherapy regimens. Materials and Methods: 1,430 patients who underwent gastric cancer surgery at Seoul National University Hospital from 2007 to 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The 5-year survival rate (5YSR) and 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) were evaluated according to the 7th and 8th systems, as well as a new categorization based on N-classification; N0-2 (LNM<7), N3a (LNM 7-15), or N3b (LNM>15). Results: The survival of N3b is comparable to that of CY1-only stage IV (log rank test, P=0.671) and is distinct from that of grossly stage IV (log rank test, P<0.001). The survival of the remaining stage IIIc (T4bN3a) was comparable to those of N3b and CY1-only stage IV. Most N3b patients had significantly shorter 3-year RFS and mean RFS than those with IIb-IIIc, as if N3b itself was a higher TNM stage. Conclusions: In terms of survival, T4bN3a, N3b, and CY1-only stage IV were unified as stage IVa, while grossly stage IV was defined as stage IVb. N3b can be regarded as an eligibility criterion for undergoing more intensive chemotherapy regimens.
Keywords
Classification; Surgery;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Yeh CN, Wang SY, Hsu JT, Chiang KC, Cheng CT, Tsai CY, et al. N3 subclassification incorporated into the final pathologic staging of gastric cancer: a modified system based on current AJCC staging. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e575.   DOI
2 Kim SH, Ha TK, Kwon SJ. Evaluation of the 7th AJCC TNM staging system in point of lymph node classification. J Gastric Cancer 2011;11:94-100.   DOI
3 Zhang Z, Huang JY, Wang PL, Hou WB, Yin SC, Xu HM. Should all stage N3b patients with advanced gastric cancer be considered equivalent? A 30-year single center study. J Gastrointest Surg 2019;23:1742-1747.   DOI
4 Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, Compton CC, Gershenwald JE, Brookland RK, et al. The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:93-99.   DOI
5 Kodera Y, Ito S, Mochizuki Y, Ohashi N, Tanaka C, Kobayashi D, et al. Long-term follow up of patients who were positive for peritoneal lavage cytology: final report from the CCOG0301 study. Gastric Cancer 2012;15:335-337.   DOI
6 Mezhir JJ, Shah MA, Jacks LM, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Positive peritoneal cytology in patients with gastric cancer: natural history and outcome of 291 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:3173-3180.   DOI
7 Lee SD, Ryu KW, Eom BW, Lee JH, Kook MC, Kim YW. Prognostic significance of peritoneal washing cytology in patients with gastric cancer. Br J Surg 2012;99:397-403.   DOI
8 Cao LL, Lu J, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, et al. Evaluation of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: an analysis of 7371 patients in the SEER database. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2019;2019:6294382.   DOI
9 Liu JY, Peng CW, Yang XJ, Huang CQ, Li Y. The prognosis role of AJCC/UICC 8th edition staging system in gastric cancer, a retrospective analysis. Am J Transl Res 2018;10:292-303.
10 Qiu MZ, Wang ZX, Zhou YX, Yang DJ, Wang FH, Xu RH. Proposal for a new TNM stage based on the 7th and 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer pTNM staging classification for gastric cancer. J Cancer 2018;9:3570-3576.   DOI
11 Crew KD, Neugut AI. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:354-362.   DOI
12 Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 2011;14:101-112.   DOI
13 Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer 2017;20:1-19.   DOI
14 Guideline Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA), Development Working Group & Review Panel. Korean practice guideline for gastric cancer 2018: an evidence-based, multi-disciplinary approach. J Gastric Cancer 2019;19:1-48.   DOI
15 Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1810-1820.   DOI
16 Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, Chung HC, Park YK, Lee KH, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:315-321.   DOI
17 Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M, et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:215-221.   DOI
18 Sastre J, Garcia-Saenz JA, Diaz-Rubio E. Chemotherapy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:204-213.   DOI
19 Homma Y, Ushida S, Yamada M, Kobayashi H, Suzuki K. Positive peritoneal washing cytology in multiple cavities can predict poor prognosis of advanced gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:455-460.   DOI
20 Narahara H, Iishi H, Imamura H, Tsuburaya A, Chin K, Imamoto H, et al. Randomized phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 alone as first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer (study GC0301/TOP-002). Gastric Cancer 2011;14:72-80.   DOI
21 Bang YJ, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung HC, Shen L, Sawaki A, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010;376:687-697.   DOI
22 Ohtsu A, Shah MA, Van Cutsem E, Rha SY, Sawaki A, Park SR, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced gastric cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled phase III study. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:3968-3976.   DOI
23 Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Hahn S, Kim WH, Lee KU, Sano T, et al. Evaluation of the seventh American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Classification of gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with the sixth classification. Cancer 2010;116:5592-5598.   DOI
24 Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1471-1474.   DOI
25 Greene FL. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: updating the strategies in cancer staging. Bull Am Coll Surg 2002;87:13-15.