Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2015.15.1.46

A Comparison of Outcomes of Three Reconstruction Methods after Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy  

Kim, Chang Hyun (Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Song, Kyo Young (Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Park, Cho Hyun (Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Seo, Young Joo (Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Park, Seung-Man (Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Kim, Jin-Jo (Department of Surgery, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea)
Publication Information
Journal of Gastric Cancer / v.15, no.1, 2015 , pp. 46-52 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the short-term surgical and long-term functional outcomes of Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively collected data from 697 patients who underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for operable gastric cancer between January 2009 and December 2012. The patients were classified into three groups according to the reconstruction methods: Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y. The parameters evaluated included patient and tumor characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Endoscopic findings of the remnant stomach were evaluated according to the residue, gastritis, bile (RGB) classification and the Los Angeles classification 1 year postoperatively. Results: Billroth I, Billroth II, and Roux-en-Y were performed in 165 (23.7%), 371 (53.2%), and 161 patients (23.1%), respectively. Operation time was significantly shorter ($173.4{\pm}44.7$ minute, P<0.001) as was time to first flatus ($2.8{\pm}0.8$ days, P=0.009), time to first soft diet was significantly faster ($4.3{\pm}1.0$ days, P<0.001), and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter ($7.7{\pm}4.0$ days, P=0.004) in Billroth I in comparison to the other methods. Postoperative complications higher than Clavien-Dindo grade III occurred in 61 patients (8.8%) with no statistically significant differences between groups (P=0.797). Endoscopic findings confirmed that gastric residue, gastritis, bile reflux, and reflux esophagitis were significantly lower in Roux-en-Y (P<0.001) patients. Conclusions: Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for middle-third gastric cancer is beneficial in terms of long-term functional outcome, whereas Billroth I reconstruction for distal-third gastric cancer has a superior short-term surgical outcome and postoperative weight change.
Keywords
Gastrectomy; Surgical anastomosis; Laparoscopy; Stomach neoplasms;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Shimada H, Gunji Y. Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1172-1176.   DOI
2 Kang KC, Cho GS, Han SU, Kim W, Kim HH, Kim MC, et al; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Comparison of Billroth I and Billroth II reconstructions after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective analysis of large-scale multicenter results from Korea. Surg Endosc 2011;25:1953-1961.   DOI
3 Kim JJ, Song KY, Chin HM, Kim W, Jeon HM, Park CH, et al. Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy with various types of intracorporeal anastomosis using laparoscopic linear staplers: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 2008;22:436-442.   DOI
4 Ishikawa M, Kitayama J, Kaizaki S, Nakayama H, Ishigami H, Fujii S, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing Billroth I and Roux-en-Y procedures after distal gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. World J Surg 2005;29:1415-1420; discussion 1421.   DOI
5 Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:146-148.
6 Crew KD, Neugut AI. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:354-362.   DOI
7 Jung KW, Won YJ, Kong HJ, Oh CM, Lee DH, Lee JS. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2011. Cancer Res Treat 2014;46:109-123.   DOI
8 Kim JP. Current status of surgical treatment of gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2002;79:79-80.   DOI
9 Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer 2011;11:69-77.   DOI
10 Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N; Japanese Laparoscopic Surgery Study Group. A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg 2007;245:68-72.   DOI
11 Lee JH, Han HS, Lee JH. A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: early results. Surg Endosc 2005;19:168-173.   DOI
12 Uyama I, Suda K, Satoh S. Laparoscopic surgery for advanced gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives. J Gastric Cancer 2013;13:19-25.   DOI
13 Kim MC, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Ryu SY, Song KY, et al; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a largescale korean multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 2008;15:2692-2700.   DOI
14 Hirao M, Takiguchi S, Imamura H, Yamamoto K, Kurokawa Y, Fujita J, et al; Osaka University Clinical Research Group for Gastroenterological Study. Comparison of Billroth I and Rouxen-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: one-year postoperative effects assessed by a multi-institutional RCT. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:1591-1597.   DOI
15 Katai H, Nunobe S, Saka M, Fukagawa T, Sano T. Reconstruction after distal gastrectomy. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 2008;109:264-268.
16 Kobori O, Shimizu T, Maeda M, Atomi Y, Watanabe J, Shoji M, et al. Enhancing effect of bile and bile acid on stomach tumorigenesis induced by N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in Wistar rats. J Natl Cancer Inst 1984;73:853-861.
17 Zong L, Chen P. Billroth I vs. Billroth II vs. Roux-en-Y following distal gastrectomy: a meta-analysis based on 15 studies. Hepatogastroenterology 2011;58:1413-1424.   DOI
18 Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A 3th, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th ed. New York: Springer, 2010.
19 Sano T, Aiko T. New Japanese classifications and treatment guidelines for gastric cancer: revision concepts and major revised points. Gastric Cancer 2011;14:97-100.   DOI
20 Yoo HM, Lee HH, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Kim JG, et al. Long-term outcomes and survival after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: three-year survival analysis of a single-center experience in Korea. J Surg Oncol 2011;104:511-515.   DOI
21 Inokuchi M, Kojima K, Yamada H, Kato K, Hayashi M, Motoyama K, et al. Long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 2013;16:67-73.   DOI
22 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205-213.   DOI
23 Kubo M, Sasako M, Gotoda T, Ono H, Fujishiro M, Saito D, et al. Endoscopic evaluation of the remnant stomach after gastrectomy: proposal for a new classification. Gastric Cancer 2002;5:83-89.   DOI
24 Miwa H, Yokoyama T, Hori K, Sakagami T, Oshima T, Tomita T, et al. Interobserver agreement in endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis using a modified Los Angeles classification incorporating grades N and M: a validation study in a cohort of Japanese endoscopists. Dis Esophagus 2008;21:355-363.   DOI
25 Lee MS, Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park do J, Lee HJ, Kim HH, et al. What is the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer? Surg Endosc 2012;26:1539-1547.   DOI
26 Mathias JR, Fernandez A, Sninsky CA, Clench MH, Davis RH. Nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain after Roux-en-Y anastomosis: motility of the jejunal limb. Gastroenterology 1985;88:101-107.   DOI
27 Hoya Y, Mitsumori N, Yanaga K. The advantages and disadvantages of a Roux-en-Y reconstruction after a distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Today 2009;39:647-651.   DOI
28 Kojima K, Yamada H, Inokuchi M, Kawano T, Sugihara K. A comparison of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg 2008;247:962-967.   DOI
29 Kumagai K, Hiki N, Nunobe S, Jiang X, Kubota T, Aikou S, et al. Different features of complications with Billroth-I and Roux-en-Y reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:2145-2152.   DOI
30 Xiong JJ, Altaf K, Javed MA, Nunes QM, Huang W, Mai G, et al. Roux-en-Y versus BillrothIreconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:1124-1134.   DOI
31 Bo T, Zhihong P, Peiwu Y, Feng Q, Ziqiang W, Yan S, et al. General complications following laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy and analysis of techniques to manage them. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1860-1865.   DOI
32 Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F, Scandroglio I, Ferrari GC, Di Lernia S, et al. Total and subtotal laparoscopic gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 2007;21:21-27.   DOI
33 Kojima K, Inokuchi M, Kato K, Motoyama K, Sugihara K. Petersen's hernia after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2014;17:146-151.   DOI