Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2011.11.3.141

Interobserver Variation in the Diagnosis of Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia and Carcinoma between Two Pathologists in Japan and Korea  

Kushima, Ryoji (Clinical Laboratory Division, National Cancer Center Hospital)
Kim, Kyoung-Mee (Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Gastric Cancer / v.11, no.3, 2011 , pp. 141-145 More about this Journal
Abstract
Although the biological potential of gastric epithelial dysplasia (GED) as a precursor of gastric cancer has never been in doubt, the classification of these lesions has been controversial and fraught with marked variations in approach to diagnosis across the world. The complexity of cyto-architectural features has been considered to be of paramount importance for the diagnosis of carcinoma in Japan, while breach of the basement membrane and invasion into the lamina propria has been considered the sine qua non of malignancy and hence a pre-requisite for the diagnosis of cancer in the West. In Korea, although the incidence of gastric cancer is similar to Japan, the diagnostic approach to GED or cancer seems to lie midway between Western and Japanese criteria. In this review, we will discuss the difference in the diagnosis of GED and cancer between two pathologists working in the comprehensive cancer center located in Japan and Korea, one of the most prevalent areas in the world for gastric cancer.
Keywords
Stomach; Dysplasia; Carcinoma; Diagnosis; Observer variation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Rugge M, Correa P, Dixon MF, Hattori T, Leandro G, Lewin K, et al. Gastric dysplasia: the Padova international classifi cation. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:167-176.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Montgomery E, Bronner MP, Goldblum JR, Greenson JK, Haber MM, Hart J, et al. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett esophagus: a reaffirmation. Hum Pathol 2001;32:368-378.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, Th eise ND. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. 4th ed. Lyon: World Health Organization, 2010:10-14.
4 Kim WH, Park CK, Kim YB, Kim YW, Kim HG, Bae HI, et al. A standardized pathology report for gastric cancer. Korean J Pathol 2005;39:106-113.
5 Downs-Kelly E, Mendelin JE, Bennett AE, Castilla E, Henricks WH, Schoenfi eld L, et al. Poor interobserver agreement in the distinction of high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in pretreatment Barrett's esophagus biopsies. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103:2333-2340.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Schlemper RJ, Itabashi M, Kato Y, Lewin KJ, Riddell RH, Shimoda T, et al. Diff erences in diagnostic criteria for gastric carcinoma between Japanese and western pathologists. Lancet 1997;349:1725-1729.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kim JM, Cho MY, Sohn JH, Kang DY, Park CK, Kim WH, et al; Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of Korean Society of Pathologists. Diagnosis of gastric epithelial neoplasia: Dilemma for Korean pathologists. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:2602-2610.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, Borchard F, Cooper HS, Dawsey SM, et al. Th e Vienna classifi cation of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000;47:251-255.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Stolte M. Th e new Vienna classifi cation of epithelial neoplasia of the gastrointestinal tract: advantages and disadvantages. Virchows Arch 2003;442:99-106.