1 |
Abel, T. and Lattal, K. M. (2001). Molecular mechanisms of memory acquisition, consolidation and retrieval. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 180-187
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Bertaina-Anglade, V., Enjuanes, E., Morillon, D. and Drieu la Rochelle, C. (2006). The object recognition task in rats and mice: a simple and rapid model in safety pharmacology to detect amnesic properties of a new chemical entity. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods. 54, 99-105
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Bliss, T. V. and Gardner-Medwin, A. R. (1973). Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the unanaestetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path. J. Physiol. 232, 357-374
DOI
|
4 |
Bussey, T. J., Muir, J. L. and Aggleton, J. P. (1999). Functionally dissociating aspects of event memory: the effects of combined perirhinal and postrhinal cortex lesions on object and place memory in the rat. J. Neurosci. 19, 495-502
DOI
|
5 |
Collinson, N., Atack, J. R., Laughton, P., Dawson, G. R. and Stephens, D. N. (2006). An inverse agonist selective for a5 subunit-containing receptors improves encoding and recall but not consolidation in the Morris water maze. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 188, 619-628
DOI
|
6 |
Ennaceur, A. and Delacour, J. (1988). A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats: I. Behavioral data. Behav. Brain. Res. 31, 47-59
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Hammond, R. S., Tull, L. E. and Stackman, R. W. (2004). On the delay-dependent involvement of the hippocampus in object recognition memory. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 82, 26-34
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Jouvenceau, A., Billard, J. M., Lamour, Y. and Dutar, P. (1996). Persistence of CA1 hippocampal LTP after selective cholinergic denervation. Neuroreport 7, 948-52
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Malenka, R. C. (2003). The long-term potential of LTP. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4, 923-926
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Kim, D. H., Yoon, B. H., Kim, Y. W., Lee, S., Shin, B. Y., Jung, J. W., Kim, H. J., Lee, Y. S., Choi, J. S., Kim, S. Y., Lee, K. T., Ryu, J. H. (2007). The seed extract of Cassia obtusifolia ameliorates learning and memory impairments induced by scopolamine or transient cerebral hypoperfusion in mice. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 105, 82-93
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Massey, P. V., Warburton, E. C., Wynick, D., Brown, M. W. and Bashir, Z. I. (2003). Galanin regulates spatial memory but not visual recognition memory or synaptic plasticity in perirhinal cortex. Neuropharmacology 44, 40-48
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Ennaceur, A., Neave, N. and Aggleton, J. P. (1996). Spontaneous object recognition and object location memory in rats: the effects of lesions in the cingulate cortices, the medial prefrontal cortex, the cingulum bundle and the fornix. Exp. Brain. Res. 113, 509-519
DOI
|
13 |
Everitt, B. J. and Robbins, T. W. (1997). Central cholinergic systems and cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 48, 649-684
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Norman, G., Brooks, S. P., Hennebry, G. M., Eacott, M. J. and Little, H. J. (2002). Nimodipine prevents scopolamine-induced impairments in object recognition. J. Psychopharmacol. 16, 153-161
DOI
|
15 |
Norman, G. and Eacott, M. J. (2004). Impaired object recognition with increasing levels of feature ambiguity in rats with perirhinal cortex lesions. Behav. Brain. Res. 148, 79-91
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Prickaerts, J., Sik, A., van der Staay, F. J., de Vente, J. and Blokland, A. (2005). Dissociable effects of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors on object recognition memory: acquisition versus consolidation. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 177, 381-390
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Molchan, S. E., Martinez, R. A., Hill, J. L., Weingartner, H. J., Thompson, K., Vitiello, B. and Sunderland, T. (1992). Increased cognitive sensitivity to scopolamine with age and a perspective on the scopolamine model. Brain Res. Rev. 17, 215-226
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Mumby, D. G. and Pinel, J. P. (1994). Rhinal cortex lesions and object recognition in rats. Behav. Neurosci. 108, 11-8
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Vannucchi, M. G., Scali, C., Kopf, S. R., Pepeu, G. and Casamenti, F. (1997). Selective muscarinic antagonists differentially affect in vivo acetylcholine release and memory performances of young and aged rats. Neuroscience 79, 837-846
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Riekkinen, M. and Riekkinen, P. Jr. (1997). Dorsal hippocampal muscarinic acetylcholine and NMDA receptors disrupt water maze navigation. Neuroreport 8, 645-648
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Riekkinen, P. Jr., Sirvio, J., Aaltonen, M. and Riekkinen, P. Effects of concurrent manipulations of nicotinic and muscarinic receptors on spatial and passive avoidance learning. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 37, 405-410
|
22 |
Whishaw, I. Q. (1985). Formation of a place learning-set by the rat: a new paradigm for neurobehavioral studies. Physiol. Behav. 35, 139-143
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Wan, H., Aggleton, J. P. and Brown, M. W. (1999). Different contributions of the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex to recognition memory. J. Neurosci. 19, 1142-1148
DOI
|
24 |
Warburton, E. C., Koder, T., Cho, K., Massey, P. V., Duguid, G., Barker, G. R. Aggleton, J. P., Bashir, Z. I. and Brown, M. W. (2003). Cholinergic neurotransmission is essential for perirhinal cortical plasticity and recognition memory. Neuron 38, 987-996
DOI
ScienceOn
|