Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40902-015-0002-8

Effect on bone formation of the autogenous tooth graft in the treatment of peri-implant vertical bone defects in the minipigs  

Kim, Seok Kon (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine)
Kim, Sae Woong (Department of OMFS, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Kim, Kyung Wook (Department of OMFS, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.37, no., 2015 , pp. 2.1-2.9 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of autogenous tooth bone as a graft material for regeneration of bone in vertical bony defects of the minipigs. Material and Methods: Six minipigs were used in this study. Four molars were extracted in the right mandibular dentition and sent to the Korea Tooth Bank for fabrication of autogenous tooth bone. Ten days later, each extraction site was implanted with MS Implant Narrow Ridge $3.0{\times}10mm$ fixture (Osstem, Seoul, Korea) after standardized 2mm-sized artificial vertical bony defect formation. Pineappleshaped Root-On type autogenous tooth bones were applied to the vertical defects around the neck area of the posterior three fixtures and the fore-most one was not applied with autogenous bone as a control group. Each minipig was sacrificed at 4, 8, 12 weeks after fixture installation and examined radiologically and histologically. Histological evaluation was done under light microscope with Villanueva osteochrome bone staining with semi-quantitative histomorphometric study. Percentage of new bone over total area (NBF) and bone to implant contact (BIC) ratio were evaluated using digital software for area calculation. Result: NBF were $48.15{\pm}18.02%$, $45.50{\pm}28.37%$, and $77.13{\pm}15.30%$ in 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively for experimental groups. The control group showed $37.00{\pm}11.53%$, $32.25{\pm}26.99%$, and $1.33{\pm}2.31%$ in 4,8,12 weeks, respectively. BIC ratio were $53.08{\pm}19.82%$, $45.00{\pm}28.37%$, and $75.13{\pm}16.55%$ in 4,8,12 weeks, respectively. Those for the control groups were $38.33{\pm}6.43%$, $33.50{\pm}29.51%$, and $1.33{\pm}2.31%$ in 4, 8, 12 weeks, respectively. Conclusion: Autogenous tooth bone showed higher score than control group in NBF and BIC in all the data encompassing 4,8,12 weeks specimens, but statistically significant only 12 weeks data in both NBF and BIC.
Keywords
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hiatt WH, Schallhorn RG (1973) Intraoral transplants of cancellous bone and marrow in periodontal lesions. J Periodontol 44:194-208   DOI
2 Ellegaard B, Karring T, Davies R, Le H (1974) New attachment after treatment of intrabony defects in monkeys. J Periodontol 45:368-377   DOI
3 Schallhorn RG (1977) Present status of osseous grafting procedures. J Periodontol 48:570-576   DOI
4 Kim SG, Yeo HH, Kim YK (1999) Grafting of large defects of the jaws with a particulate dentin-plaster of Paris combination. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 88:22-25   DOI
5 Kim SG, Chung CH, Kim YK (2001) Grafting defects using a particulate dentin-plaster of Paris combination for implant placement: a case report. Hosp Dent (Tokyo) 13:127-130
6 Kim SG, Chung CH, Kim YK, Park JC, Lim SC (2002) The use of particulate dentin-plaster of Paris combination with/without platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of bone defects around implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:86-94
7 Hwang YJ, Kim SG, Yoon JH, Lim SC (2004) Effect of bone regeneration of a mixture of human, bovine, pig, rabbit, or dog tooth-ash and plaster of Paris in rats. J Korean Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 26:155-161
8 Park SS, Kim SG, Lim SC, Ong JL (2008) Osteogenic activity of the mixture of chitosan and particulate dentin. J Biomed Materials Res 87A:618-623   DOI
9 Kim SG, Kim HK, Lim SC (2001) Combined implantation of particulate dentin, plaster of Paris, and a bone xenograft (Bio-Oss) for bone regeneration in rats. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29:282-288   DOI
10 Urist MR (1965) Bone formation by autoinduction. Science 150:893-899   DOI
11 Yeomans JD, Urist MR (1967) Bone induction by decalcified dentin implanted into oral, osseous, and muscle tissues. Arch Oral Biol 12:999-1008   DOI
12 Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Um IU, Lim SC, Kim SY (2010) Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:496-503   DOI
13 Tomoki N, Junichi W, Akiko E, Tomohiro T, Miki O (2010) A new method for alveolar bone repair using extracted teeth for the graft material. J Periodontol 81:1264-1272   DOI
14 Chung JH, Lee JH (2011) Study of bone healing pattern in extraction socket after application of demineralized dentin matrix material. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:365-374   DOI
15 Murata M, Akazawa T, Takahata M, Ito M, Tazaki J, Hino J, Nakamura K, Iwasaki N, Shibata T, Arisue M (2010) J Ceram Soc Jpn 118:434-437   DOI
16 Jeong HR, Hwang JH, Lee JK (2011) Effectiveness of autogenous tooth bone used as a graft material for regeneration of bone in miniature pig. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:375-379   DOI
17 McKee MD, Aoba T, Moreno EC (1991) Morphology of the enamel organ in the miniature swine. Anat Rec 230:97-113   DOI
18 Carter DR, Beaupre GS, Giori NJ, Helms JA (1998) Mechanobiology of skeletal regeneration. Clin Orthop Rel Res 355S:S41-S55   DOI
19 Misch CE. Available bone and dental implant treatment plans. In Misch CE (ed.2) Contemporary implant dentistry. pp178-99, St. louis, Missouri: Mosby Co, 2008