Browse > Article

Reconstruction of Mandibular Bone Defect Using a Titanium Mesh with Autogenous Particulate Cortical Bone Graft by an Intraoral Approach: A Case Report  

Choi, Seok-Tai (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University, Brain Korea 21 Project)
Leem, Dae-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University, Brain Korea 21 Project)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.34, no.6, 2012 , pp. 466-472 More about this Journal
Abstract
The loss of mandibular continuity due to trauma, neoplasm, or infection results in major esthetic and biologic compromise. The reconstruction of the mandibular bone defect still poses a challenge to oral and maxillofacial surgeons. There have been a number of variety graft materials. Among them, free block bone graft with rigid fixation has been widely used. However, cases using free block bone grafts may lead to a marked invasion of the donor site, mal-union, and absorption of the block bone. In this respect, particulate cortical bone using a titanium mesh tray can be an effective alternative option in order to achieve a proper bone contour and good oral rehabilitation. We have developed an intraoral approach for the mandibular reconstruction method using a titanium mesh tray with autogenous particulate cortical bone graft.
Keywords
Mandible; Reconstruction; Particulate cortical bone; Intraoral approach;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Boyne PJ, Zarem H. Osseous reconstruction of the resected mandible. Am J Surg 1976;132:49-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Block MS, Kent JN, editors. Endosseous implants for maxillofacial reconstruction. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders Co.; 1995.
3 Curtis TA, Ware WH, Beirne OR, Frankel ME. Autogenous bone grafts for atrophic edentulous mandibles: a final report. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:73-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Schwartz-Arad D, Levin L. Multitier technique for bone augmentation using intraoral autogenous bone blocks. Implant Dent 2007;16:5-12.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Korean association of maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgeons, editor. Textbook of maxillofacial plastic surgery & reconstructive surgery. 2nd ed. clinical application of maxillofacial reconstruction. Seoul: Dental & medical publishing Co.; 2009.
6 Mooren RE, Merkx MA, Kessler PA, Jansen JA, Stoelinga PJ. Reconstruction of the mandible using preshaped 2.3-mm titanium plates, autogenous cortical bone plates, particulate cancellous bone, and platelet-rich plasma: a retrospective analysis of 20 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:2459-67.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kim YB, Cho SD, Leem DH. Suture technique for successful guided bone regeneration; preliminary report of double layered suture technique with subgingival suture. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;31:86-91.
8 Kruger GV, editor. Textbook of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 6th ed. Toronto: Mosby; 1984.
9 Fonseca R, Ddnvis WH, editors. Reconstructive preprosthetic oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W.B Saunders Co.; 1995.
10 Harakas NK. Demineralized bone-matrix-induced osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984;188:239-51.
11 Nystrom E, Ahlqvist J, Kahnberg KE, Rosenquist JB. Autogenous onlay bone grafts fixed with screw implants for the treatment of severely resorbed maxillae. Radiographic evaluation of preoperative bone dimensions, postoperative bone loss, and changes in soft-tissue profile. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25:351-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Misch CM. Use of the mandibular ramus as a donor site for onlay bone grafting. J Oral Implantol 2000;26:42-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Jensen J, Sindet-Pedersen S, Oliver AJ. Varying treatment strategies for reconstruction of maxillary atrophy with implants: results in 98 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52: 210-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Miller NA, Penaud J, Kohler C, Ambrosini P. Regeneration of bone graft donor sites. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:326-30.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Schwartz-Arad D, Levin L. Intraoral autogenous block onlay bone grafting for extensive reconstruction of atrophic maxillary alveolar ridges. J Periodontol 2005;76:636-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Avery JK. Development of cartilages and bonesof the facial skeleton. In: Avery JK, editor. Oral development and histology. New York: Thieme medical publishers; 1994.
17 Precious DS, Smith WP. The use of mandibular symphyseal bone in maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;30:148-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Lu M, Rabie AB. Quantitative assessment of early healing of intramembranous and endochondral autogenous bone grafts using micro-computed tomography and Q-win image analyzer. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;33:369-76.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Takikawa S, Bauer TW, Kambic H, Togawa D. Comparative evaluation of the osteoinductivity of two formulations of human demineralized bone matrix. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;65:37-42.
20 Schenk RK. Bone regeneration: biologic basis. In: Buser D, Dahlin C, Schenk RK, editors. Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1994.
21 Boyne PJ. Restoration of osseous defects in maxillofacial casualities. J Am Dent Assoc 1969;78:767-76.
22 Kim YK, Kim HT, Cho CU. Reconstruction of intraoral jaw defects with corticocancellous block of mandibular symphysis. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;26:666-71.
23 Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wiltfang J. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:53-8.