Browse > Article

Soft Tissue Change in Frontal View after Orthognathic Surgery for Class III Malocclusion: Analysis Using Facial 'Phi' Mask  

Heo, Young-Min (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
Kim, Hong-Soek (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
Paeng, Jun-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
Hong, Jong-Rak (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
Kim, Chang-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.33, no.6, 2011 , pp. 490-496 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Dr. Marquardt made the facial 'phi' mask using golden ratio. Most class III patients have bulky faces and want a smaller face. Using a facial golden mask, this study estimated and compared frontal photographs before and after operation for soft tissue measurement. The golden mask can be considered as a reference tool for facial esthetic analyses especially in lower face. Methods: Forty patients who had undergone orthognathic surgery at Samsung Medical Center from January 2006 to December 2009 were included in this study. These patients had Class III malocclusion. Lateral cephalometric radiographs, frontal clinical photos of pre-op and 8~12 month later post-op, and the facial 'phi' mask using golden ratio, were used for analysis. Reduction of the lower face area, occlusal plane changes, amounts of mandible setback and amounts of maxilla posterior impaction were estimated. Results: Lower facial reduction ratio and mandibular setback amounts were significantly different between 1-jaw and 2-jaw groups. Average postoperative changes in the area of lower face between bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) and BSSRO combined maxilla posterior impaction were compared by using an independent simple t-test and $P$ value was 0.016. Therefore, the lower facial reduction ratio and mandibular setback amount were significantly different in maxilla posterior impaction. Conclusion: The two-jaw surgery group showed more reduction of the lower facial area than the 1-jaw surgery group. The amount of lower facial reduction was more related with the amount of mandibular setback. There was no significant relation in lower facial reduction with amount of maxilla posterior impaction, pre-op occlusal plane, post-op occlusal plane and the mandibular angle. A relationship between the change in the lower facial area and the amount of maxilla posterior impaction or the change of mandibular angle occlusal plane at pre-op could not be found because of the difference in the amount of setback between two groups.
Keywords
Orthognathic surgery; Photography;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sforza C, Peretta R, Grandi G, Ferronato G, Ferrario VF. Soft tissue facial planes and masticatory muscle function in skeletal Class III patients before and after orthognathic surgery treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:691-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Tang ZL, Wang X, Yi B. Reverse-engineering-based quantitative three-dimensional measurement of facial swelling after administration of Yunnan Baiyao following orthognathic surgery. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2008;88:2482-6.
3 Levin EI. Dental esthetics and the golden proportion. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:244-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Ricketts RM. The golden divider. J Clin Orthod 1981;15:752-9.
5 Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Kolar JC, Munro IR. Vertical and horizontal proportions of the face in young adult North American Caucasians: revision of neoclassical canons. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:328-38.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Farkas LG, Kolar JC. Anthropometrics and art in the aesthetics of women's faces. Clin Plast Surg 1987;14:599-616.
7 Facial aesthetic surgery: art, anatomy, anthropometrics, and imaging. Clin Plast Surg 1987;14:579-788.
8 Kawakami S, Tsukada S, Hayashi H, Takada Y, Koubayashi S. Golden proportion for maxillofacial surgery in Orientals. Ann Plast Surg 1989;23:417-25.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kim YH. Easy facial analysis using the facial golden mask. J Craniofac Surg 2007;18:643-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Marquardt SR, Stephen R. Marquardt on the Golden Decagon and human facial beauty. Interview by Dr. Gottlieb. J Clin Orthod 2002;36:339-47.
11 Hennebert PN, Seghers MJ. Survey of surgical pathology of the jaws in the congo. Ann Soc Belges Med Trop Parasitol Mycol 1964;44:1081-94.
12 Lombardi RE. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:358-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Bashour M. An objective system for measuring facial attractiveness. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;118:757-74.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Ricketts RM. Divine proportion in facial esthetics. Clin Plast Surg 1982;9:401-22.
15 Proffit WR. The soft tissue paradigm in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning: a new view for a new century. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:46-9.   DOI
16 Wictorin L, Hillerstrom K, Sorensen S. Biological and psycho-social factors in patients with malformation of the jaws. I. A study of 95 patients prior to treatment. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:138-43.   DOI
17 Betts NJ, Dowd KF. Soft tissue changes associated with orthognathic surgery. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2000;8:13-38.
18 Naoumova J, Soderfeldt B, Lindman R. Soft tissue profile changes after vertical ramus osteotomy. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:359-65.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Islam R, Kitahara T, Naher L, Hara A, Nakata S. Lip morphology changes following orthognathic surgery for Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 2010;80:344-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, et al. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:239-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Sforza C, Peretta R, Grandi G, Ferronato G, Ferrario VF. Three-dimensional facial morphometry in skeletal Class III patients. A non-invasive study of soft-tissue changes before and after orthognathic surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;45:138-44.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Ricketts RM. The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 1982;81:351-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Farkas LG, Sohm P, Kolar JC, Katic MJ, Munro IR. Inclinations of the facial profile: art versus reality. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985;75:509-19.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Holland E. Marquardt's Phi mask: pitfalls of relying on fashion models and the golden ratio to describe a beautiful face. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008;32:200-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Harada K, Kikuchi T, Morishima S, Sato M, Ohkura K, Omura K. Changes in bite force and dentoskeletal morphology in prognathic patients after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;95:649-54.   DOI   ScienceOn