Browse > Article

Study on Characteristics of Maxillofacial Growth in Class III Malocclusion Patients by Cranial Base Growth  

Son, Do-Kyoung (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University)
Park, Sung-Won (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University)
Lee, Jae-Min (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University)
Kim, Eun-Ja (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University)
Choi, Sang-Mun (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University)
Kim, Young-Woon (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University)
Choi, Mun-Gi (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University)
Oh, Sung-Hwan (Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental College, Wonkwang University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.33, no.6, 2011 , pp. 483-489 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Craniofacial structure form results from the adaptation to morphologic and functional changes in their neighboring structures for a mutual balance. The purpose of this study is classification of maxillomandibular complex growth pattern follow by cranial base growth pattern. And this study is identifying the correlation between maxilla-mandibular complex growth pattern and orthodontic criteria. Methods: 142 Class III malocclusion patients had orthognathic surgery at Wonkwang University Dental Hospital during April 2004 to October 2010. Patients were divided into 4 groups and the correlation between cranial base and maxillomandibular growth patterns were evaluated. Results: There was a correlation between cranial base and maxillomandibular growth patterns. Positive relationships were found between the occlusal plane, Incisor mandibular plane angle, mandibular plane, positioning of pogonion and the saddle angle, indicating maxillary growth patterns. Negative relationships were found between SNA, SNB, maxillary incisor angle and saddle angle. Positive relationships were found between the ratio of the anterior and posterior cranium, positioning of pogonion and the percentage of cranial depth indicating mandibular growth patterns. Negative relationships were found between the occlusal plane, maxillary incisor angle, mandibular plane, mandibular angle and cranial depth. Conclusion: Cranial base and maxillofacial growth patterns were correlated and the classification should be adjusted before orthognathic surgery.
Keywords
Angle class III malocclusion; Cranial base; Maxillofacial growth pattern; Orthognathic surgery;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Delaire J, Precious D. Interaction of the development of the nasal septum, the nasal pyramid and the face. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1987;12:311-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Precious D, Delaire J. Balanced facial growth: a schematic interpretation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:637-44.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Jacobson A, Evans WG, Preston CB, Sadowsky PL. Mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod 1974;66:140-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Kerr WJ, Adams CP. Cranial base and jaw relationship. Am J Phys Anthropol 1988;77:213-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Rak D, Muretic Z, Slaj M. Relation between cranial base flexure and position of the jaws. Coll Antropol 1997;21:539-47.
6 Sato S. Case report: developmental characterization of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1994;64:105-11.
7 Sato S, editor. New approach to treatment of malocclusion. Seoul: Ji-Sung Publishing; 1992.
8 Seren E, Akan H, Toller MO, Akyar S. An evaluation of the condylar position of the temporomandibular joint by computerized tomography in Class III malocclusions: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:483-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Solow B, Siersbaek-Nielsen S. Cervical and craniocervical posture as predictors of craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:449-58.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Huggare J, Houghton P. Associations between atlantoaxial and craniomandibular anatomy. Growth Dev Aging 1996;60:21-30.
11 Delaire J, Schendel SA, Tulasne JF. An architectural and structural craniofacial analysis: a new lateral cephalometric analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981;52:226-38.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Markus AF, Delaire J, Smith WP. Facial balance in cleft lip and palate. I. Normal development and cleft palate. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;30:287-95.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Delaire J, Mercier J. The place of the chin in the architecture of the face. In: Levignac J, editor. The Chin. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1990. p.45-61.
14 Ellis E 3rd, McNamara JA Jr. Components of adult Class III open-bite malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1984;86:277-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Zeng XL. A study of skeletal types of class III malocclusion. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 1993;28:170-3, 191.
16 Battagel JM. The aetiology of Class III malocclusion examined by tensor analysis. Br J Orthod 1993;20:283-95.   DOI
17 Battagel JM. The aetiological factors in Class III malocclusion. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:347-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Delaire J. Maxillary development revisited: relevance to the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusions. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:289-311.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Enlow DH, editor. The human face. New York: Hoeber;1968.
20 Guyer EC, Ellis EE 3rd, McNamara JA Jr, Behrents RG. Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents. Angle Orthod 1986;56:7-30.
21 Bjork A. Some biological aspects of prognathism and occlusion of the teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 1950;9:1-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Bjork A, Skieller V. Growth of the maxilla in three dimensions as revealed radiographically by the implant method. Br J Orthod 1977;4:53-64.   DOI
23 Han DH, Cha KS. The cephalometric study of skeletal types in Class III malocclusion with reduced lower anterior face height. Korean J Orthod 1996;26:205-18.
24 Hong SX, Yi CK. A classification and characterization of skeletal class III malocclusion on etio-pathogenic basis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;30:264-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Sanborn RT. Differences between the facial skeletal patterns of Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion. Angle Orthodont 1955;25:208.
26 Kim SC, Lee KS. The cephalometric study of facial types in class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod 1990;20:519-39.
27 Lim HH, Yun HJ, Kim KW. A study of the characteristics of craniofacial skeleton on orthognatic surgical cases III patients. Korean J Orthod 1998;28:189-201.
28 Park CJ, Lee KS. Characteristics of craniofacial structures in severe adult Class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod 1998;28:219-29.
29 Martone VD, Enlow DH, Hans MG, Broadbent BH Jr, Oyen O. Class I and Class III malocclusion sub-groupings related to headform type. Angle Orthod 1992;62:35-42.
30 Mackay F, Jones JA, Thompson R, Simpson W. Craniofacial form in class III cases. Br J Orthod 1992;19:15-20.   DOI
31 Precious DS, Hall BK. Growth and development of the maxillofacial region. In: Peterson LJ, editor. Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. vol.3. Philadephia: J.B. Lippincott company; 1994. p.1223-9.