Browse > Article

Guided Bone Regeneration Using Mineralized Bone Allograft and Barrier Membrane Derived from Ox Pericardium  

Lim, Hyoung-Sup (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Kim, Su-Gwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Moon, Seong-Yong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Oh, Ji-Su (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Jeong, Kyung-In (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Park, Jin-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Jeong, Mi-Ae (Department of Dental Hygiene, Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.33, no.4, 2011 , pp. 359-362 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical applications of implant placement and guided bone regeneration using a mineralized bone allograft and a barrier membrane derived from ox pericardium Methods: From January 2007 to June 2009, among the patients who received an implant at Chosun University Dental Hospital, patients were selected if they were treated with guided bone regeneration (GBR) with simultaneous implant placement or GBR prior to implant placement. The selected patients were sorted according to the materials and membranes used in GBR, and the implant survival rate was recorded by clinical examination and reviewing the medical records and the radiographs. Each study list was analyzed by SPSS (version 12.0, SPSS Inc., USA) software and the survival rate was verified by Chi-square tests. $P$ values less than 0.05% were deemed significant. Results: 278 implants were placed on a total of 101 patients and 8 implants resulted in failure. Three implants failed among 15 implants with only a mineralized bone allograft. No failure was shown among the 74 implants placed with mineralized bone allograft and a barrier membrane derived from ox pericardium. One group of 4 implant placements showed failure among the 102 implants placed with a mineralized bone allograft and another bone graft material. The group that had a barrier membrane derived from ox pericardium with a mineralized bone allograft or other bone materials showed no implant failure. Three failures were shown among the 21 implants placed with only bone graft and not using a membrane. The group with membranes other than a barrier membrane derived from ox pericardium showed 5 failures among 170 implants. Conclusion: The implant survival rate of the group with GBR using a mineralized bone allograft was 96.3%, which meant there was little difference compared to the groups of another bone graft materials (98.9%). The implant survival rate of the group without a membrane-was 85.7% and it showed a significant difference compared to the group using a barrier membrane derived from ox pericardium (100%) and the group using another membrane (97.1%).
Keywords
Allograft; Bone regeneration; Dental implant; Survival rate;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Williamson RA. Rehabilitation of the resorbed maxilla and mandible using autogenous bone grafts and osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:476-88.
2 Sumi Y, Miyaishi O, Tohnai I, Ueda M. Alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium mesh and autogenous bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;89: 268-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Roccuzzo M, Ramieri G, Spada MC, Bianchi SD, Berrone S. Vertical alveolar ridge augmentation by means of a titanium mesh and autogenous bone grafts. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:73-81.
4 Moses O, Pitaru S, Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. Healing of dehiscence- type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: a comparative clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:210-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Biasi GM, Sternjakob S, Mingazzini PM, Ferrari SA. Nineyear experience of bovine pericardium patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:271-7.
6 Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss in combination with venous blood. A histologic and histomorphometric study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:217-29.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Choi WS, Yoon KY, Park JW, Lee SH, Lee CH, Gagner M. Bile duct replacement using bovine pericardial patch graft: an experimental study. J Korean Surg Soc 2006;71:128-33.
8 Kim JH, Kim IC. Bovine pericardium as a wrapping material for hydroxyapatite orbital implant. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc 2001;42:939-49.
9 DeBacker CM, Dutton JJ, Proia AD, Stone T, Holck DE. A comparative study of bovine pericardium (periguard) and homologous sclera as lower eyelid spacer graft analogs in New Zealand white rabbits. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;16:156-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38: 613-6.
11 Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sager M, Herten M, Sculean A, Becker J. Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:369-78.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Simion M, Trisi P, Piattelli A. Vertical ridge augmentation using a membrane technique associated with osseointegrated implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1994;14:496-511.
13 Simsek B, Simsek S. Evaluation of success rates of immediate and delayed implants after tooth extraction. Chin Med J (Engl) 2003;116:1216-9.
14 Steigmann M. Pericardium membrane and xenograft particulate grafting materials for horizontal alveolar ridge defects. Implant Dent 2006;15:186-91.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Collins TA. Onlay bone grafting in combination with Branemark implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1991;3: 893-902.
16 Feuille F, Knapp CI, Brunsvold MA, Mellonig JT. Clinical and histologic evaluation of bone-replacement grafts in the treatment of localized alveolar ridge defects. Part 1: Mineralized freeze-dried bone allograft. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:29-35.
17 Gunther KP, Scharf HP, Pesch HJ, Puhl W. Osteointegration of solvent preserved bone transplants in an animal model. Osteologie 1996;5:4-12.
18 Froum SJ, Wallace SS, Elian N, Cho SC, Tarnow DP. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:543-51.
19 Keith JD Jr, Petrungaro P, Leonetti JA, et al. Clinical and histologic evaluation of a mineralized block allograft: results from the developmental period (2001∼2004). Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:321-7.
20 Ozeren M. eComment: Foreign body reaction to polytetrafluoroethylene. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:276-7.