Browse > Article

Initial Stability after Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Application in Patients with Mandibular Prognathism  

Kwon, Myung-Hee (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University, Brain Korea 21 Project)
Leem, Dae-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University, Brain Korea 21 Project)
Baek, Jin-A (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University, Brain Korea 21 Project)
Shin, Hyo-Keun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University, Brain Korea 21 Project)
Ko, Seung-O (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University, Brain Korea 21 Project)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.33, no.3, 2011 , pp. 218-224 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the post-operative skeletal stability after surgical correction of patients with mandibular prognathism by bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) and to evaluate the horizontal relapse tendency after the surgery. Methods: Twenty-six patients with Class III dental and skeletal malocclusion were selected for this retrospective study. Fifteen of them underwent BSSRO for mandibular setback and eleven of them underwent two-jaw surgery (Lefort I and BSSRO). In each patient, lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken pre-operatively, post-operatively within 1 week, and post-operatively after eight months. After tracing of the cephalometric radiographs, various parameters were measured. The analyses were done by linear measurement to evaluate the change in position of hard tissue B point, pogonion and mandibular plan angle by examination on lateral cephalograms. Results: The horizontal relapse rate was 27.1% at B point and 31.6% at pogonion in patients who underwent BSSRO. The horizontal relapse rate of the group where the amount of correction exceeded 10 mm was 25.69% at B point. Conclusion: There were no statistical differences on the magnitude of setback and direction of rotation of the mandible in mandibular stability. There were also no statistical differences between single mandibular surgery and two-jaw surgery for mandibular stability.
Keywords
Mandibular prognathism; Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO); Stability; Relapse;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Proffit WR, Phillips C, Dann C 4th, Turvey TA. Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. I. Mandibular setback. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1991;6:7-18.
2 McNeill RW, Hooley JR, Sundbger RJ. Skeletal relapse during intermaxillary fixation. J Oral Surg 1973;31:212-27.
3 Epker BN, Wessberg GA. Mechanisms of early skeletal relapse following surgical advancement of the mandible. Br J Oral Surg 1982;20:175-82.   DOI
4 Steinhauser EW. Advancement of the mandible by sagittal ramus split and suprahyoid myotomy. J Oral Surg 1973;31:516-21.
5 Sorokolit CA, Nanda RS. Assessment of the stability of mandibular setback procedures with rigid fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:817-22.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Kirkpatrick TB, Woods MG, Swift JQ, Markowitz NR. Skeletal stability following mandibular advancement and rigid fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:572-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Souyris F. Sagittal splitting and biocortical screw fixation of the ascending ramus. J Maxillofac Surg 1978;6:198-203.
8 Epker BN, Fish LC. The surgical-orthodontic correction of Class III skeletal open-bite. Am J Orthod 1978;73:601-18.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Isaacson RJ, Kopytov OS, Bevis RR, Waite DE. Movement of the proximal and distal segments after mandibular ramus osteotomies. J Oral Surg 1978;36:263-8.
10 Yellich GM, McNamara JA Jr, Ungerleider JC. Muscular and mandibular adaptation after lengthening, detachment, and reattachment of the masseter muscle. J Oral Surg 1981;39:656-65.
11 Paulus GW, Steinhauser EW. A comparative study of wire osteosynthesis versus bone screws in the treatment of mandibular prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982;54:2-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Epker BN, Wolford LM, Fish LC. Mandibular deficiency syndrome. II. Surgical considerations for mandibular advancement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1978;45:349-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Wessberg GA, Schendel SA, Epker BN. The role of suprahyoid myotomy in surgical advancement of the mandible via sagittal split ramus osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1982;40:273-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Franco JE, Van Sickels JE, Thrash WJ. Factors contributing to relapse in rigidly fixed mandibular setbacks. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:451-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Kobayashi T. Watanabe I, Ueda K, Nakajima T. Stability of the mandible after sagittal ramus osteotomy for correction of prognathism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:693-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Trauner R, Obwegeser H. The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1957;10:677-89.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Bailey LT, Proffit WR, White RP Jr. Trends in surgical treatment of Class III skeletal relationships. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1995;10:108-18.
18 Proffit WR, Turvey TA, Phillips C. Orthognathic surgery: a hierarchy of stability. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1996;11:191-204.
19 Pepersack WJ, Chausse JM. Long term follow-up of the sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Maxillofac Surg 1978;6:117-40.
20 Kang JY, Choi HW, Kim KW. Analysis of short face tendency and it's determinant factors after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy of mandibular prognathism. J Korean Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;29:407-20.
21 Maclntosh RB. Experience with the sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus: a 13-year review. J Maxillofac Surg 1981;9:151-65.
22 Downs WB. Variations in facial relationship; their significance in treatment and prognosis. Am J Orthod 1948;34:812-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Ellis E 3rd, McNamara J Jr. Cephalometric reference planes--sella nasion vs Frankfort horizontal. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1988;3:81-7.
24 Marcotte MR. Head posture and dentofacial proportions. Angle Orthod 1981;51:208-13.
25 Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1978;36:269-77.
26 Ive J, McNeill RW, West RA. Mandibular advancement: skeletal and dental changes during fixation. J Oral Surg 1977;35:881-6.
27 Nakajima T, Kajikawa Y, Tokiwa N, Hanada K. Stability of the mandible after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion in 50 patients. J Oral Surg 1979;37:21-5.
28 Ayoub AF, Millett DT, Hasan S. Evaluation of skeletal stability following surgical correction of mandibular prognathism. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;38:305-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Michiwaki Y, Yoshida H, Ohno K, Michi K. Factors contributing to skeletal relapse after surgical correction of mandibualr prognathism. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1990;18:195-200.   DOI