Browse > Article

Effect of Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound with Adipose-Derived Stem Cells on Bone Healing around a Titanium Implant in Tibia of Osteoporosis-Induced Rats  

Lee, Kwang-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Choi, Yeon-Sik (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Shin, Sang-Hun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Chung, In-Kyo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Kim, Gyoo-Cheon (Department of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Kim, Cheol-Hun (Department of Dentistry, Dong-A Medical Center)
Kim, Uk-Kyu (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.33, no.3, 2011 , pp. 199-209 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Osteoporosis, is a major health problem for the elderly and post-menopausal women and shown to alter the properties of bone as well as impair bone healing around titanium implants in both human and animals. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of LIPUS with adipose-derived stem cells on the healing process around a titanium implant in rats with osteoporosis. Methods: Sixteen osteoporosis-induced rats were divided into two groups: an adipose-derived stem cell injected with Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS) application group and a control group. Titanium screw implants (diameter, 2.0 mm: length, 3.5 mm, Cowell Medi, Korea) were placed into both tibia of 16 rats, on 8 rats as the control group and the other 8 rats as the experimental group. Rats were sacrificed at different intervals from 1, 2, 4 and 8 weeks after implantation for histopathologic and immunohistochemical analyses. Results: Histopathological analysis revealed newly formed bone in experimental group earlier than that in control group. Especially at 1 week after implantation, more amounts of new bone matrix and collagen around the implant in the experimental group were seen compared with the control group. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that the levels of osteoprotegerin (OPG) expression in the experimental group were increased at early stages compared with that of control group until 2 weeks after implantation. But after 2 weeks, the expression level of OPG similar in both groups. The expression levels of receptor activator of nuclear factor kB ligand (RANKL) were stronger in the experimental group than the control group until 2 weeks after implantation. After 4 weeks, expression of RANKL in experimental group was similar to the control group. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that LIPUS with Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in implantation could promote bone healing around titanium implants in rats with osteoporosis.
Keywords
Low Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound (LIPUS); Stem cell; Osteoporosis; Implant;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
2 Brunski JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:85-97.
3 Siegele D, Soltesz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:333-40.
4 Meffert RM, Block MS, Kent JN. What is osseointegration? Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1987;7:9-21.
5 Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Friberg B, Sennerby L, Grondahl K, Bergstrom C, Back T, Lekholm U. On cutting torque measurements during implant placement: a 3-year clinical prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:75-83.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Lekholm U. Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. A pilot study in jaw autopsy specimens. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;6:213-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Erdogan O, Shafer DM, Taxel P, Freilich MA. A review of the association between osteoporosis and alveolar ridge augmentation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:738.e1-13.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Li L, Zhu Z, Huang C, Chen W. Ultrasound: a potential technique to improve osseointegration of dental implants. Med Hypotheses 2008;71:568-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Machen MS, Tis JE, Inoue N, Meffert RH, Chao EY, McHale KA. The effect of low intensity pulsed ultrasound on regenerate bone in a less-than-rigid biomechanical environment. Biomed Mater Eng 2002;12:239-47.
11 De Oliveira RF, Oliveira DA, Monteiro W, Zangaro RA, Magini M, Soares CP. Comparison between the effect of low-level laser therapy and low-intensity pulsed ultrasonic irradiation in vitro. Photomed Laser Surg 2008;26:6-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Wu CC. Exposure to low-intensity ultrasound stimulates aggrecan gene expression by cultured chondrocytes. Trans Orthop Res Soc 1995;21:622-9.
13 Dimitriou R, Babis GC. Biomaterial osseointegration enhancement with biophysical stimulation. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2007;7:253-65. Review.
14 Duarte LR. The stimulation of bone growth by ultrasound. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1983;101:153-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Heckman JD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, Frey JJ, Kilcoyne RF. Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:26-34.
16 Ryaby JT. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound modulates adenylate cyclase activity and transforming growth factor beta synthesis. In: Brighton CT, Pollack SR, editors. Electromagnetics in biology and medicine. San Francisco: San Francisco Press; 1995. p.95-100.
17 Caplan AI. Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res 1991;9:641-50.   DOI
18 Johnstone B, Hering TM, Caplan AI, Goldberg VM, Yoo JU. In vitro chondrogenesis of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells. Exp Cell Res 1998;238:265-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Pan J, Shirota T, Ohno K, Michi K. Effect of ovariectomy on bone remodeling adjacent to hydroxyapatite-coated implants in the tibia of mature rats. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:877-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Martin RB, Paul HA, Bargar WL, Dannucci GA, Sharkey NA. Effects of estrogen deficiency on the growth of tissue into porous titanium implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:540-7.
21 Mori H, Manabe M, Kurachi Y, Nagumo M. Osseointegration of dental implants in rabbit bone with low mineral density. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:351-61; discussion 362.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Kim MG, Jung IK, Shin SH, et al. Effect of adipose-derived stem cells on bone healing on titanium implant in tibia of diabetes mellitus induced rats. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;36:392-401.   DOI
23 Lee RH, Kim B, Choi I, et al. Characterization and expression analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow and adipose tissue. Cell Physiol Biochem 2004;14:311-24.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Theoleyre S, Wittrant Y, Tat SK, Fortun Y, Redini F, Heymann D. The molecular triad OPG/RANK/RANKL: involvement in the orchestration of pathophysiological bone remodeling. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2004;15:457-75.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature 2003;423:337-42.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Kim YD, Kim SS, Hwang DS, et al. Effect of low-level laser treatment after installation of dental titanium implant- immunohistochemical study of RANKL, RANK, OPG: an experimental study in rats. Lasers Surg Med 2007;39:441-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 1999;284:143-7.   DOI
28 Hwang DS, Kim UK, Chang MC, et al. Osteogenic differentiation of stem cells in gelatin-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite. Korea Tissue Eng Regen Med 2009;6:1107-13.
29 Renner RP, Boucher LJ, Kaufman HW. Osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:581-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Johnston CC Jr, Slemenda CW. Pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Bone 1995;17(2 Suppl):19S-22S. Review.
31 Boyce BF, Xing L. Biology of RANK, RANKL, and osteoprotegerin. Arthritis Res Ther 2007;9 Suppl 1:S1.   DOI
32 Kristiansen TK, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, Frey JJ, Roe LR. Accelerated healing of distal radial fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:961-73.
33 Takayama T, Suzuki N, Ikeda K, et al. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulates osteogenic differentiation in ROS 17/2.8 cells. Life Sci 2007;80:965-71.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Naruse K, Mikuni-Takagaki Y, Azuma Y, et al. Anabolic response of mouse bone-marrow-derived stromal cell clone ST2 cells to low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000;268:216-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Kwan Tat S, Padrines M, Theoleyre S, Heymann D, Fortun Y. IL-6, RANKL, TNF-alpha/IL-1: interrelations in bone resorption pathophysiology. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2004;15:49-60. Review.   DOI   ScienceOn