Browse > Article

COMPARISON OF RESONANCE FREQUENCY ANALYSIS BETWEEN VARIOUS SURFACE PROPERTIES  

Bae, Sang-Bum (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ajou University)
Lee, Seong-Hyun (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ajou University)
Song, Seung-Il (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ajou University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.32, no.2, 2010 , pp. 107-111 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the stability between Mg-incorporated implant, TiUnite and Machined implant. Materials and Methods: Premolars of 3 Mini pigs (24 months) were extracted. After 2 months later, total 27 fixtures of implants (9 of each design : Machined/ TiUnite/ Mg-incorporated) were inserted into the mandible of 3 mini-pig. Implant stability was estimated by RFA in installation to 2, 4 & 6 weeks. Statistical analysis of RFA values was performed with time and between groups using repeated measure ANOVA and turkey's multiple comparison test. Results: In analyzing the mean value for the observation periods, three types of implants yielded a slight decrease in RFA mean value after 2 week, followed by increase at 4-6 weeks. Mg incorporated oxidized implants demonstrated significantly higher RFA mean values at 6 weeks comparing other groups. The difference of RFA value with time and between groups was statistically significant. Conclusion: We concluded that Mg implants may reduce failure rates of clinical implants In the early period of bone healing and Mg implants may shorten the bone healing time from surgery to functional loading.
Keywords
Implant surface; Magnesium oxidized implant; Implant stability; RFA;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB et al : Quality of dental implants. Int Dent J 53 : 409, 2003.
2 Huang HM, Chiu CL : Early detection of implant healing process using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 14 : 437, 2003,   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Puleo DA, Thomas MV : Implant surfaces. Dent Clin N Am 50 : 323, 2006,   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Huwiler MA, Pjetursson BE, Bosshardt DD et al : Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone characteristics and during early healing of implant installation. Clin oral Implants Res 18 : 275, 2007.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Abrahamsson I, Bergllundh T, Linder E et al : Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surface. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral implants Res 15 : 381, 2004,   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Barewall RM, Oates TW, Meredith N et al : Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 18 : 641, 2003.
7 Sui YT, Johansson CB, Byon E et al : The bone response to oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive implants. Biomaterials 26 : 6720, 2005,   DOI   ScienceOn
8 SuI YT : On the Bone Response to Oxidized Titanium Implants: The Role of Microporous Structure and Chemical Composition of the Surface oxide in Enhanced osseointegration (thesis). Goteborg, Sweden : University of Ooteborg. 2002,
9 SuI YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S et al : Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: The oxidized thickness, micro-pore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials 23 : 491, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Meredith N : Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 11 : 491, 1998.
11 Zhou Y, Jiang T, Qian M et al : Roles of bone scintigraphy and resoonance frequency analysis in evaluating osseointegration of endosseous implant. Biomaterials 29 : 461, 2008.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B et al : A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium. Clin Oral Implants Res 6 : 24, 1995,   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Hall J, Lausmaa J : Properties of a new porous oxide surface on titanium implants. Appl Osseointegration Res 1 : 5, 2000.
14 Sui YT, Johansson P, Byon E et al : Bone response to Mgincoporated, oxidized implnats in rabbit femur: Mechanical interlocking vs Biochemical bonding. Journal of Applied Biomaterials and biomechanics 3 : 18, 2005.
15 Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C et al : Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titamium micro-implants in human jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 : 341, 2003,
16 Vanden Bogaerde L, Rangert B, Wendelhag I : Immediate/early function of Branemark System TiUnite implants in fresh extraction sockets in maxillae and posterior mandibles: an 18-month prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 7 : 121, 2005.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 SuI YT : The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: Special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials 24 : 3893, 2003.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T : Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 : 331, 2000,
19 Eckert SE, Parein A, Myshin HL et al : Validation of dental implant systems through a review of lliterature supplied by system manufactures. J Prosthet Dent 77 : 271, 1997,   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Albreksson T, Dahl E, Enbom L et al : Osseointegraged oral implants, A swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants, J Periodontol 59 : 287, 1988,   DOI