1 |
Jokstad A, Braegger U, Brunski JB et al : Quality of dental implants. Int Dent J 53 : 409, 2003.
|
2 |
Huang HM, Chiu CL : Early detection of implant healing process using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 14 : 437, 2003,
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Puleo DA, Thomas MV : Implant surfaces. Dent Clin N Am 50 : 323, 2006,
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Huwiler MA, Pjetursson BE, Bosshardt DD et al : Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone characteristics and during early healing of implant installation. Clin oral Implants Res 18 : 275, 2007.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Abrahamsson I, Bergllundh T, Linder E et al : Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surface. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral implants Res 15 : 381, 2004,
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Barewall RM, Oates TW, Meredith N et al : Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 18 : 641, 2003.
|
7 |
Sui YT, Johansson CB, Byon E et al : The bone response to oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive implants. Biomaterials 26 : 6720, 2005,
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
SuI YT : On the Bone Response to Oxidized Titanium Implants: The Role of Microporous Structure and Chemical Composition of the Surface oxide in Enhanced osseointegration (thesis). Goteborg, Sweden : University of Ooteborg. 2002,
|
9 |
SuI YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S et al : Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: The oxidized thickness, micro-pore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials 23 : 491, 2002.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Meredith N : Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 11 : 491, 1998.
|
11 |
Zhou Y, Jiang T, Qian M et al : Roles of bone scintigraphy and resoonance frequency analysis in evaluating osseointegration of endosseous implant. Biomaterials 29 : 461, 2008.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B et al : A histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium. Clin Oral Implants Res 6 : 24, 1995,
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Hall J, Lausmaa J : Properties of a new porous oxide surface on titanium implants. Appl Osseointegration Res 1 : 5, 2000.
|
14 |
Sui YT, Johansson P, Byon E et al : Bone response to Mgincoporated, oxidized implnats in rabbit femur: Mechanical interlocking vs Biochemical bonding. Journal of Applied Biomaterials and biomechanics 3 : 18, 2005.
|
15 |
Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C et al : Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titamium micro-implants in human jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 : 341, 2003,
|
16 |
Vanden Bogaerde L, Rangert B, Wendelhag I : Immediate/early function of Branemark System TiUnite implants in fresh extraction sockets in maxillae and posterior mandibles: an 18-month prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 7 : 121, 2005.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
SuI YT : The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: Special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials 24 : 3893, 2003.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T : Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 : 331, 2000,
|
19 |
Eckert SE, Parein A, Myshin HL et al : Validation of dental implant systems through a review of lliterature supplied by system manufactures. J Prosthet Dent 77 : 271, 1997,
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Albreksson T, Dahl E, Enbom L et al : Osseointegraged oral implants, A swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants, J Periodontol 59 : 287, 1988,
DOI
|