Browse > Article

THE EFFECT OF NEW BONE FORMATION OF ONLAY BONE GRAFT USING VARIOUS GRAFT MATERIALS WITH A TITANIUM CAP ON THE RABBIT CALVARIUM  

Park, Young-Jun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, 2nd stage of Brain Korea, Chonnam National University)
Choi, Guen-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, 2nd stage of Brain Korea, Chonnam National University)
Jang, Jung-Rok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, 2nd stage of Brain Korea, Chonnam National University)
Jung, Seung-Gon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, 2nd stage of Brain Korea, Chonnam National Universityㅊ)
Han, Man-Seung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, 2nd stage of Brain Korea, Chonnam National University)
Yu, Min-Gi (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, 2nd stage of Brain Korea, Chonnam National University)
Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, 2nd stage of Brain Korea, Chonnam National University)
Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, 2nd stage of Brain Korea, Chonnam National University)
Ryu, Sun-Youl (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, 2nd stage of Brain Korea, Chonnam National University)
Oh, Hee-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, 2nd stage of Brain Korea, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.31, no.6, 2009 , pp. 469-477 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate the effect of various graft materials used with a titanium cap on the ability of new bone formation in the rabbit calvarium. Materials and Methods: A total of 32 sites of artificial bony defects were prepared on the calvaria of sixteen rabbits by using a trephine bur 8 mm in diameter. Each rabbit had two defect sites. 0.2 mm deep grooves were formed on the calvaria of sixteen rabbits by using a trephine bur 8 mm in diameter for the fixation of a titanium cap. The treatments were performed respectively as follows: without any graft for the control group (n=8), autogenous iliac bone graft for experimental group 1 (n=8), alloplastic bone graft ($SynthoGraft^{(R)}$, USA) for experimental group 2 (n=8), and xenogenic bone graft ($NuOss^{(R)}$, USA) for experimental group 3 (n=8). After the treatments, a titanium cap (8 mm in diameter, 4 mm high, and 0.2 mm thick) was fixed into the groove. At the third and sixth postoperative weeks, rabbits in each group were sacrificed for histological analysis. Results: 1. In gross examination, the surgical sites showed no signs of inflammation or wound dehiscence, and semicircular-shaped bone remodeling was shown both in the experimental and control groups. 2. In histological analysis, the control group at the third week showed bone remodeling along the inner surface of the cap and at the contact region of the calvarium without any specific infiltration of inflammation tissue. Also, there was no soft tissue infiltration. Bone remodeling was observed around the grafted bone and along the inner surface of the titanium cap in experimental group 1, 2, and 3. 3. Histologically, all groups at the sixth week showed the increased area of bone remodeling and maturation compared to those at the third week. In experimental group 2, the grafted bone was partially absorbed by multi nucleated giant cells and new bone was formed by osteoblasts. In group 3, however, resorption of the grafted bone was not observed. 4. Autogenous bone at the third and sixth week showed the most powerful ability of new bone formation. The size of newly formed bone was in decreasing order by autogenous, alloplastic, and heterogenous bone graft. There was no statistically significant difference among autogenous, alloplastic, and heterogenous bones(p>0.05). Summary: This result suggests that autogenous bone is the best choice for new bone formation, but when autogenous bone graft is in limited availability, alloplastic and xenogenic bone graft also can be an alternative bone graft material to use with a suitably guided membrane.
Keywords
Titanium cap; Bone regeneration; Autogenous bone graft; Alloplastic bone graft; Xenogeneic bone graft;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S et al : Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 : 53, 2003   PUBMED
2 Boo JS : Tissue-engineered bone using mesenchymal stem cells and a biodegradable scaffold. J Craniofac Surg 13 : 231, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Slotte C : Placement of autogenic bone chips or bovine bone mineral in guided bone augmentation: a rabbit skull study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18 : 795, 2003   PUBMED
4 Johnson GS : Mater Sci Mater Med 11 : 427, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Lu M, Rabie AB : Microarchitecture of rabbit mandibular defects grafted with intramembranous or endochondral bone shown by micro-computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41 : 385, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Nanba K : Effects of bone graft material(Bio-oss) on bone augmentation within the titanium cap in rabbit parietal bone. Nihon University Dental journal 73 : 480, 1999
7 Wiltfang J, Merten HA, Schlegel KA : Degradation characteristics of alpha and beta tri-calcium-phosphate (TCP) in minipigs. J Biomed Mater Res 63 : 115, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Daniel VS : Bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium barrier. Clin Oral Implant Res 14 : 63, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kostopoulos L, Karring T : Augmentation of the rat mandible using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implant Res 5 : 75, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Garg AK : Bone biology, harvesting, and grafting for dental implants, Preface, Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc. 22, 2004
11 Taylor JC : In vitro osteoclast resorption of bone substitute biomaterials used for implant site augmentation: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17 : 321, 2002   PUBMED
12 Duda M : The issue of bioresorption of the Bio-Oss xenogeneic bone substitute in bone defects. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska 59 : 269, 2004
13 Johansson B, Grepe A, Wannfors K et al : A clinical study of changes in the volume of bone grafts in the atrophic maxilla. Dentomaxillofac Rad 39 : 157, 2001
14 Herron S : Ingrowth of bone into absorbable bone cement: an in vivo microscopic evaluation. Am J Orthoped 12 : 581, 2003
15 Anderson MR : J Mater Sci Mater Med 11 : 743, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Schmid J : The significance of angiogenesis in guided bone regeneration. A case report of a rabbit experiment. Clin Oral Implant Res 8 : 244, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Pautke C : Polychrome labeling of bone with seven different fluorochromes: enhancing fluorochrome discrimination by spectral image analysis. Bone 37 : 441, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Dahlin C : Scientific background of guided bone regeneration. Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc. 31, 1994
19 Kazuaki T : The use of porous $\beta$-Tricalcium phosphate blocks with platelet-rich plasma as an onlay bone graft biomaterial. J periodontol 78 : 315, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Yutaka Y : Effects of occlusiveness of a titanium cap on bone generation beyond the skeletal envelope in the rabbit calvarium. Clin Oral Implant Res. 14 : 455, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Hislop WS, Finlay PM, Moos KF : A preliminary study into the uses of anorganic bone in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31 : 149, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Tamimi FM : Bone augmentation in rabbit calvariae: comparative study between Bio-oss$^{\circledR}$ and a novel $\beta$-TCP/DCPD granulate. J Clin Periodontol 33 : 922, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Misch CE, Dietsh F : Bone-grafting materials in implant dentistry. Implant Dent 2 : 158, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Lundgren D : Augmentation of intramembraneous bone beyond the skeletal envelope using an occlusive titanium barrier. Clin Oral Implant Res 6 : 67, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Artzi Z, Weinreb M, Givol N : Biomaterial resorption rate and healing site morphology of inorganic bovine bone beta-tricalcium phosphate in the canine: a 24-month longitudinal histologic study and morphometic analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19 : 357, 2004   PUBMED   ScienceOn
26 Giannousid PV : Bone substitute. an update. Injury 36 : 20, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Stavropoulos A : Fate of bone formed by guided tissue regeneration with or without grafting of Bio-Oss and Biogran. an experimental study in the rat. J Clin Periodontol 31 : 30, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Velich N, Nemeth Z, Toth C et al : Long-term results with different bone substitutes used for sinus floor elevation. J Craniofac Surg 15 : 38, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn