Browse > Article

BONE DENSITY AND HISTOMORPHOMETRY ASSESSMENT OF DENTAL IMPLANT USING COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY  

Son, Jang-Ho (Department of Oral and maxillofacial Surgery, College of medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan University)
Choi, Byung-Hwan (Department of Oral and maxillofacial Surgery, College of medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan University)
Park, Soo-Won (Department of Oral and maxillofacial Surgery, College of medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan University)
Cho, Yeong-Cheol (Department of Oral and maxillofacial Surgery, College of medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan University)
Sung, Iel-Yong (Department of Oral and maxillofacial Surgery, College of medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan University)
Lee, Ji-Ho (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, College of medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan University)
Byun, Ki-Jung (Department of Oral and maxillofacial Surgery, College of medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.31, no.2, 2009 , pp. 136-142 More about this Journal
Abstract
Bone density in the recipient implant site seems to be an important factor for long term success of endosseous implants. Preoperative evaluation of bone density is very helpful to assist the clinician with the treatment planning of implant therapy. Accurate information on bone density will help the surgeon identify suitable implant sites, thereby improving the success rate of the procedure. Purpose; The aim of this study was to evaluate a correlation between bone density measured preoperatively with computerized tomography and histologically measured bone density by bone biopsy. Patients and methods; Twenty seven patients were selected. All the patients were in good health, with no systemic disorder and additional bone graft. Preoperatively the patients underwent CT scanning to evaluate Houmsfield Unit(HU). Each patients wore a surgical template for implant placement. During surgery 2mm in diameter and 6mm in length specimens were taken. Histomorphometric analysis was performed using digitalized image analysis software Axiovision 4.3. Also, the Resonance frequency analysis(RFA) and insertion torque values were recorded. Results; The highest histomorphometric values was found in the posterior mandible $32.3{\pm}3.8$, followed by $29.9{\pm}2.6$ for the posterior maxilla, $29.4{\pm}2.6$ for the anterior maxilla, $28.6{\pm}2.3$ for the anterior mandible(p=0.214). The hounsfield unit was $989.2{\pm}258.1$ in the posterior mandible, $845.0{\pm}241.5$ in the anterior maxilla, $744.5{\pm}92.6$ in the anterior mandible, $697.3{\pm}136.9$ in the posterior maxilla(p=0.045). This results may suggest that there are strong correlation between the histomorphometric values and hounsfield unit(r=0.760, p<0.05). The RF measurements were $81.9{\pm}2.4$ ISQ in the posterior mandible, $79.0{\pm}1.4$ ISQ in the anterior mandible, $78.3{\pm}4.6$ ISQ in the posterior maxilla, $76.5{\pm}5.0$ ISQ in the anterior maxilla(p=0.048). The insertion torque values was $43.2{\pm}4.2\;Ncm$ in the posterior mandible, $42.0{\pm}0.0\;Ncm$ in the anterior mandible, $41.3{\pm}4.1\;Ncm$ in the posterior maxilla, $40.8{\pm}3.8\;Ncm$ in the anterior maxilla(p=0.612). This results may suggest that there are statistical significance between the hounsfield unit and the insertion torque values(r=0.494, p<0.05), the histomorphometric values and the insertion torque values(r=0.689, p<0.05). But there was no correlation between histomorphometric values and ISQ. There was no statistical significance in age and gender effect on parameters. Conclusions; There was significant correlations between bone density and implant stability parameters. The bone density measurements using preoperative CT may help clinicians to predict primary stability before implant insertion, which is associated with implant survival rates.
Keywords
Bone density; Dental implants; Computerized tomography;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lekhlom U, Zarb GA : Patient selection and preparation. In branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T(eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheeses : osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, Quintessence, 1985, p199
2 Goodacre CJ, Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K : Clinical complication of osseointegrated Implants. J Prosthet Dent 81 :537, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B et al : A 15 year study of osseointegrated Implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 10 : 387, 1981   DOI   PUBMED
4 Duckmanton NA, Austin BW, Lechner SK et al : Imaging for predictable maxillary implants. Int J Prosthodont 7 : 77, 1994
5 Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P : Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 7 : 261, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Devlin H, Horner K, Ledgerton D : A Comparison of maxillary and mandibular bone mineral densities. J Prosthet Dentistry 79 : 323, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Sennerby L, meredith N : Resonance frequency analysis ; measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compend Contin Educ Dent 19 : 493, 1998
8 Trisi P, Rao W : Bone Classification: Clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clin Oral Implants Res 10 : 1, 1999   DOI
9 Fanfani F, Pierazzini A : La Tomografia Assiale Computerizzata del Distetto Maxillo-facciale. 3D-Dentascan e derivati. Torino, Italy : UTET Perioici, 1996
10 Turkyilmaz I, Tumer C, Ozbek EN et al : Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implants stability parameters ; a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants. J Clin Periodontol 34 : 716, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Fanuscu MI, Chang TL : Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of human cadaver bone : microstructural data from maxilla and mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 15 : 213, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Turkyilmaz I, Tozum TF, Tumer C et al : Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of bone and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement. J Oral Rehabil 33 : 881, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Meredith N : Assessment of implants stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 11 : 491, 1998
14 Mische CE. Density of bone : Effect on treatment planning surgical approach, and healing. In ; Misch CE(ed). Contemporary Implant Dentistry, St Louis, Mosby-Year Book, 1993, p469
15 Johansson P, Strid KG : Assessment of bone quality from placement resistance during implant surgery. Int J oral Maxillofac Implants 9 : 279, 1994
16 Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM et al :Quantitative Evaluation of Bone Density Using the Hounsfield Index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21 : 290, 2006
17 Todisco M, Trisi P : Bone mineral Density and Bone Histomorphometry are Statistically Related. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20 : 898, 2005
18 Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P et al : Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 12 : 423, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Engquist B, Bergendal T, linden U : A Retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated Implants supporting overdenture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3 : 129, 1998
20 Hans D, Fuerst T, Uffmann M : Bone density and quality measurement using ultrasound. Current Opinions in Rheumatology 8 : 370, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Da Cunha HA, Francischone CE, Filho HN et al : A Comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency in assessment of primary stability and final torque capacity of standard and TiUnite single tooth implants under immediate loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19 : 578, 2004
22 Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U : Early failure in 4641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants ; a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3 : 129, 1988
23 Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N et al : A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20 months clinical styuy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28 : 297, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Norton MR, Gamble C. Bone classification : An objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan. Clin Oral Implants Res 12 : 79, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Thomsen JS, Ebbensen EN, Mosekilde L : Relationships between static histomorphometry and bone strength measurements in human iliac crest bone biopsies. Bone 22 : 153, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn