1 |
van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C et al : The applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism : a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5 : 271-81, 1990
|
2 |
Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P et al : Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 5 : 254-262, 2003
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Baelum V, Ellegaard B : Implant survival in periodontally compromised patients. J Periodontol 75 : 1404-12, 2004
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Rieger MR : Loading considerations for implants. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 3 : 795-804, 1991
|
5 |
Jaffin RA, Berman CL : The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type Ⅳ bone. A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 62 : 2-4, 1991
DOI
|
6 |
Kim DS, Kim IK, Jang KS et al : The three dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution and deformation in mandible according to the position of pontic in two implants supported three-unit fixed partial denture. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 34 : 166-79, 2008
|
7 |
Mal P, Nobre M, Rangert B : Short implants placed onestage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 9 : 15-21, 2007
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Zienkiewicz OC : The finite element method in engineering science, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989, p.114
|
9 |
Weinberg LA : The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8 : 19-31, 1993
|
10 |
Bahat O : Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8 : 151-6, 1993
|
11 |
Skalak R : Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 49 : 843-8, 1983
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Stegaroiu R, Sato T, Kusakari H et al : Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants : a three-dimensional finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 10 : 345, 1995
|
13 |
Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A et al : influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution : a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 91 : 20-5, 2004
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Skalak R : Aspect of biomechanical consideration, in Br -
nemark, P-I., Azrd, G.A., and Albrektsson, T(eds) : Tissue integration prosthesis, Chicago, Quintessence, 1985, p.117-128
|
15 |
Romeo E, Ghisolfi M, Rozza R et al : Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism : a 3- to 14-year longitudinal study. Int J Prosthodont 19 : 586-92, 2006
|
16 |
Meyer U, Vollmer D, Unte C et al : Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae : a finite-element study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 29 : 100-105, 2001
|
17 |
Holmes D, Loftus JT : Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endoosseous implants. J Oral Implantol 23 : 104-11, 1997
|
18 |
Br nemark PI : Osseointegration and its experimental background, J Prosthet Dent 50 : 399-410, 1983
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Tecucianu JF et al : The self-tapping and ICE 3i implants: a prospective 3-year multicenter evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16 : 52-60, 2001
|
20 |
Vigolo P, Givani A : Clinical evaluation of single-tooth mini-implant restorations: a five-year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 84 : 50-4, 2000
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Carter DR, Fyhrie DP, Whalen RT : Fatigue behavior of adult cortical bone. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 45 : 481-490, 1981
DOI
|
22 |
Das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR et al : Short implants-an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21 : 86-93, 2006
|
23 |
Zarb GA, Schmitt A : The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III : Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 64 : 185-94, 1990
DOI
ScienceOn
|