1 |
Downs WB : Analysis of the dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod 26 : 191, 1956
|
2 |
Springer IN, Wannicke B, Warnke PH et al : Facial Attractiveness: Visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline. Ann Plast Surg 59 : 156, 2007
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL et al : Effect of Head orientation on posterior anterior cephalometric landmark identification. 66(1) : 51, 1996
PUBMED
|
4 |
Hurst CA, Eppley BL, Havlik RJ : Surgical Ceph-alometrics: Applications and developments. Plast Reconstr Surg 120 : 92, 2007
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Major PW, Johnson DE, Hesse KL et al : Landmark identification error in posteiror anterior cephalometrics. Angle Orthod 64(6) : 447, 1994
PUBMED
|
6 |
Chen YJ, Chen SK, Chang HF et al : Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry. Angle Orthod 70(5) : 387, 2000
PUBMED
|
7 |
Taub PJ, Koch RM : Orbital dystopia managed with unilateral brow suspension. Mt Sinai J Med 73(7) : 1031, 2006
|
8 |
Arnett GW, McLaughlin RP : Facial and dental planning for orthodontics and oral surgerns. Elsevier Inc, 2004, p.51
|
9 |
Baek SH, Cho IS, Chang YI et al : Skeletodental factors affecting chin point deviation in female patiens with class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry: a three-dimensional analysis using computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 104 : 628, 2007
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Zepa I, Huggare J : Reference structures for assessment of frontal head posture. Eur J Orthod 20 : 694, 1998
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Gliddon MJ, Xia JJ, Gateno J et al : The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64 : 194, 2006
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Svanholt P, Solow B : Assessment of midline discrepancies on the postero-anterior cephalometric radiograph. Tran Eur Orthod Soc 25 : 261, 1977
|
13 |
Trpkova B, Prasad NG, Lam EW et al : Assessment of facial asymmetry from posteroanterior cephalograms: Validity of reference lines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 123 : 512, 2003
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Lundstrom F, Lundstrom A : Natural head position as a basis for cephalometric analysis. Am J Ortohd Dentofacial Orthop 101(3) : 244, 1992
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Padwa BL, Kaiser MO, Kaban LB : Occlusal cant in the frontal plane as a reflection of facial asymmetry. J Oral maxillofacial Surg 55 : 811, 1997
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Pirttiniemi P, Miettinen J, Kantomaa T : Combined effect of errors in frontal-view asymmetry diagnosis. Eur J Orthod 18 : 629, 1996
DOI
|
17 |
Janson G, de Lima KJ, Woodside DG et al : Class II subdivision malocclusion types and evaluation of their asymmetries. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131 : 57, 2007
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Alves PV, Mazucheli J, Vogel CJ et al : Technical straregies: A protocol for cranial base reference in cephalometric studies. J Craniofac Surg 19(1) : 211, 2008
DOI
|
19 |
Steiner CC : Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod 29 : 8, 1959
|
20 |
McNamara J : A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Ortho 86(6) : 449, 1984
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Michiels LY, Tourne LP : Nasion true vertical: a proposed method for testing the clinical validity of cephalomeric measurements applied to a new cephalometric reference line. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 5(1) : 43, 1990
PUBMED
|
22 |
Yogosawa F : Predicting soft tissue profile changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 60(3) : 199, 1990
PUBMED
|
23 |
Farman AG, Scarfe WC : Development of imaging selection criteria and procedures should precede cephalometric assessment with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 : 257, 2006
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Mulick JF : Clinical use of the frontal head film. Angle Orthod 35 : 299, 1965
|
25 |
Grummons DC, Kappeyne MA : A frontal asymmetry analysis. J Clin Ortho 21 : 448, 1987
|
26 |
Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Hilgers JJ et al : An overview of computerized cephalometrics. Am J Ortho 61 : 1, 1972
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Kragskov J, Bosch C, Gyldensted C et al : Composition of the reliability of craniofacial anatomy landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 34(2) : 111, 1997
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Agthong S, Huanmanop T, Chentanez V : Anatomical variations of the supraorbital, infraorbital, and mental foramina related to gender and side. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 : 800, 2005
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Huisinga-Fischer CE, Zonneveld FW, Vaandrager JM et al : CT-based size and shape determination of the craniofacial skeleton: a new scoring system to assess bony deformity in hemifacial microsomia. J Craniofac Surg 12(1) : 87, 2001
DOI
|
30 |
Park JH, Son SI, Jang HJ et al : Nasal deviation in patients with mandibulo-facial asymmetry. J of Korean association of maxillofacial Plastic & Reconstructive surgery 27(2) : 151, 2005
|
31 |
Tweed CH : Frankfort mandibular incisior angles in diagnosis: treatment planning and prognosis. Angle Orthod 24 : 121, 1954
|
32 |
Masuoka N, Muramatsu A, Ariji Y et al : Discriminative thresholds of cephalometric indexes in the subjective evaluation of facial asymmetry. Am J Orthodo Dentofacial Orthop 131 : 609, 2007
DOI
ScienceOn
|