Browse > Article

TRANSVERSE CHANGE OF THE PROXIMAL SEGMENT AFTER BILATERAL SAGITTAL SPLIT RAMUS OSTEOTOMY IN MANDIBULAR PROGNATHISM USING COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY  

Kim, Young-Joon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
Shet, Uttom Kumar (2nd stage of Brain Korea 21 for School of Dentistry)
Oh, Hee-Kyun (2nd stage of Brain Korea 21 for School of Dentistry)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.30, no.3, 2008 , pp. 232-240 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate transverse changes of proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) using 3-D CT in mandibular prognathism. Patients and methods: Twenty-two patients who underwent BSSRO for mandibular set-back in class III malocclusion without facial asymmetry were examined. Miniplates were used for the fixation after BSSRO. Facial CT was taken before and after BSSRO within 3 months. Frontal-ramal inclination (FRI), inter-gonial width (IGW) and intercondylar width (ICW) were measured in 3-D CT images using V-works $4.0^{TM}$ program. Student t-test was used to compare the changes between pre- and post-operative measurements using SPSS 10.0 program. Results: 1. Mean peroperative FRI value ($12.87{\pm}3.43^{\circ}$) was slightly increased to postoperative value ($14.13{\pm}3.72^{\circ}$) (p < 0.05). The average FRI increased 10.42% and the range was from $-2.46^{\circ}$ to $3.34^{\circ}$. 2. Mean peroperative IGW ($99.01{\pm}5.36$) was slightly decreased to postoperative IGW ($96.51{\pm}5.88mm$) (p < 0.05). The average IGW decreased 2.52 % and the range was from $-6.61^{\circ}$ to 0.91 mm. 3. Mean preoperative ICW ($125.01{\pm}5.30mm$) was slightly decreased to postoperative ICW ($125.40{\pm}5.45mm$) (p < 0.05). There is no significant difference between pre- and post-operative ICW. 4. There was significant correlationship between FRI difference and IGW difference (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These results indicate that the lower ramus of the proximal segment is moved inward after BSSRO procedure for mandibular set-back.
Keywords
Transverse change; Mandibular prognathism; 3D-CT; Frontal-ramal inclination; Intergonial width; Intercondylar width;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Obwegeser H, Trauner R : Zur opeationstechnik bei der progenie und anderen unterkieferanomalien. Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheikd 23 : H1-H2, 1955
2 Magalhaes AE, Stella JP, Tahasuri TH : Change in condylar position following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with setback. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 10 : 137, 1995   PUBMED
3 Hwang HS, Hwang JH, Lee KH et al : Maxillofacial 3- dimensional image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. American J Ortho Dentofac Orthope, 130 : 779, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Athanasiou AE, Mavreas D : Tomographic assessment of alterations of the temporomandibular joint after surgical correction of madibular prognathism. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognatho Surg 6 : 105, 1991
5 Lee W, Park JU : Three-dimensional evaluation of positional change of the condyle after mandibular set-back by means of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 94 : 305, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Hunsuck EE : A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technic for correction of mandibular prognathism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26 : 250, 1968
7 Baek SH, Kim TK, Kim MJ : Is there any difference in the condylar position and angulation after asymmetric mandibular setback? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101 : 155, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Harris MD, Van Sickels JE, Alder M : Factors influencing condylar position after the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy fixed with bicortical screws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57 : 650, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Dalpont G : Retomolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism. J Oral Surg Anesth Hosp Dent Serv 19 : 42, 1961   PUBMED
10 Hu J, Wang D, Wou S : Effects of mandibular setback on the temporomandibular joint; a comparison of oblique and sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58 : 375, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Schendel SA, Epker BN : Results after mandibular advancement surgery: An analysis of 87cases. J Oral Surg 38 : 265, 1980   PUBMED
12 Kawamata A, Fujishita M, Nagahara K et al : Threedimensional computed tomography evaluation of postsurgical condylar displacement after mandibular osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral radio Endod 85 : 371, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Angle AD, Rebellato J, Sheats RD : Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bialteral sagittal split osteotomy advancement and its effect on relapse. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65 : 50, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Epker BN : Modifications in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Surg 35 : 157, 1977   PUBMED
15 Tuinzing DB, Swart JG : Change of the mandibular condylar head using lag screw after sagittal ramus osteotomy. Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2 : 94, 1978
16 Hwang SJ, Haers PE, Zimmermann A et al : Surgical risk factors for condylar resorption after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89 : 542, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Cavalcanti MG, Haller JW, Vannier MW : Three-dimensional computed tomography landmark measurement in craniofacial surgical planning; experimental validation in vitro. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57 : 690, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Son HM, Rim JS, Kwon JJ, Jang HS, Lee BK : A cephalometric study on changes of facial molphology in the frontal view following mandible set back surgery (BSSRO) in patients with skeletal class III dentofacial deformities. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 22 : 337, 2000   과학기술학회마을
19 Becktor JP, Robellato J, Kartin BB : Transverse displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 : 395, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Kundert M, Hadjianghelou O : Condylar displacement fater sagittal splitting of the mandibluar rami. A shortterm radiographic study. J Maxillofac Surg 8 : 278, 1980   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Kim IH, Han CH, Ryu SY : Change in gonial angle and mandibular width after orthognathic surgery in mandibular prognathic patients. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 32 : 129, 2006   과학기술학회마을
22 Nishimura A, Sakurada S, Iwase M et al : Positional changes in the mandibular condyle and amount of mouth opening after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid or non-rigid osteosynthesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55 : 672, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Choi HS, Rebellato J, Yoon HJ et al : Effect of mandibular setback via bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on transverse displacement of the proximal segment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 : 908, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Reyneke JP : Essentials of orthognathic surgery. Quintessence Publishing 1 : 299, 2003