Browse > Article

A HISTOLOGICAL STUDY ON SEVERAL IMPLANTS FOR AUGMENTATION RHINOPLASTY IN MOUSE CALVARIUM  

Kim, Hyun-Syeob (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
Oh, Hee-Kyun (2nd stage of Brain Korea 21, Chonnam National University)
Kim, Hyung-Seok (Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.29, no.4, 2007 , pp. 289-300 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: This study was aimed to histologically evaluate $Silicone^{(R)}$, $Gore-tex^{(R)}$, $AlloDerm^{(R)}$, and $Medpor^{(R)}$ implants for augmentation rhinoplasty after graft in the subperiosteum of mural calvarium respectively. Materials and method: Twenty four male ICR mice were used. $Silicone^{(R)}$, $Gore-tex^{(R)}$, $AlloDerm^{(R)}$, and $Medpor^{(R)}$ were grafted respectively in the subperiosteum of frontal bone. Animals were sacrificed at 1 week, 4 week and 8 week after graft. Histological observation was performed after H&E staining. Results: All groups were healed without any extrusion of implant materials and inflammatory cell infiltration. In Silicone group, $Silicone^{(R)}$ was well enclosed by thin fibrous tissue at 1 week, which became thicker and stable at 4 weeks and 8 weeks. And there was no destruction or resorption of $Silicone^{(R)}$ In Gore-tex group, there was no destruction or resorption of $Gore-tex^{(R)}$. Thin fibrous tissue and cell infiltration from peripheral tissue were observed at 1 week, 4 weeks and 8 weeks. In AlloDerm group, $AlloDerm^{(R)}$ was enclosed by fibrous tissue. Cell infiltration was observed at 1 week, 4 weeks and 8 weeks. In Medpor group, there was no inflammation, destruction or resorption of $Medpor^{(R)}$ and it was contacted directly to the bone without interposition of fibrous tissue. Porous area was filled by bone or soft tissue. Conclusion: These results suggest that $Gore-tex^{(R)}$, $AlloDerm^{(R)}$, and $Medpor^{(R)}$ graft are more stable than $Silicone^{(R)}$ graft and that $Silicone^{(R)}$, $Gore-tex^{(R)}$, $AlloDerm^{(R)}$ are appropriate for graft on nasal tip and $Medpor^{(R)}$ is appropriate for graft on nasal dorsum.
Keywords
Graft material; Augmentation rhinoplasty;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kang JS : Plastic Surgery, 3rd edition. Seoul, Koonja, 2004
2 Maas C, Gnepp D, Bumpous J : Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene(Gore-Tex Soft-Tissue Patch) in Facial Augmentation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119 : 1008, 1993   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 Jackson IT, Yavuzer R : AlloDerm for Dorsal Nasal Irregularities. Plast Reconstr Surg 107 : 553, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Peck GO : Techniques in Aesthetic Rhinoplasty. New York, Gower Medical Publiching, 1984
5 Ousterhout DK, Stelnicki EJ : Plastic surgery's plastics. Clinics in Plastic Surg 23 : 183, 1996
6 Ustundag E, Boyaci Z, Keskin G et al : Soft Tissue Response of the Larynx to Silicone, Gore-Tex, and Irradiated Cartilage implants. Laryngoscope 115 : 1009, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Brown JB, Fryer MP, Randall P et al : Silicone in plastic surgery: laboratory and clinical investigations: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 12(5) : 374, 1953   DOI
8 Waldman S : Goretex for augmentation of the nasal dorsum : a preliminary report. Ann of Plast Surg 26 : 520, 1991   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
9 Godin M, Waldman S, Johnson C : Nasal Augmentation Using Gore-Tex ; A 10-Year Experiance. Arch Facial Plast Surg 1 : 118, 1999   DOI   PUBMED
10 Berghaus A, Stelter K : Alloplastic materials in rhinoplasty. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head & Neck Surgery 14(4) : 270, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kim SG, Yeo HH : An experimental study on tissue response following the implantation of Medpor (Prous polyethylene) in the rats. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 20 : 127-132, 1998
12 Menon NG, Rodriguez ED, Byrnes CK et al : Revascularization of human acellular dermis in full-thickness abdominal wall reconstruction in the rabbit model. Ann Plast Surg 50 : 523, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Zeng Y, Wu W, Yu H et al : Silicone Implant in Augmentation Rhinoplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 26 : 85, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Wellisz T : Clinical Experience with the Medpor Porous Polyethylene Implant. Aesth Plast Surg 17 : 339, 1993   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
15 Jung DH, Jung YK, Lee WW et al : A study on grafts and implants materials in augmentation rhinoplasty. Korean J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg 39 : 250-257, 1996
16 Gryskiewicz J : Waste Not, Want Not : The Use of Alloderm in Secondary Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 116 : 1999, 2005. 대한악안면성형재건외과학회지: Vol. 29, No. 4, 2007 300
17 Choe JY, Min CG, Myeong H et al : Nasal augmentation using Goretex. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 25 : 331-336, 2003
18 Hamm KS, Chung SC, Lee SH : Complications of Oriental Augmentation Rhinoplasty. Arch Otolaryngol 109 : 164, 1983   DOI   PUBMED
19 Choi JW, Kim MR, Kim SJ et al : Midfacial changes following the paranasal augmentation with alloplastic Medpor. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 18 : 177-183, 1996
20 Achauer BM, VanderKam VM, Celikoz B et al : Augmentation of facial soft-tissue defects with AlloDerm dermal graft. Ann Plast Surg 41 : 503, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn