Browse > Article

A CASE REPORT ABOUT CORRECTION OF IMPLANT POSITION AT HORIZONTAL PLANE AFTER CORTICOTOMY  

Choi, Bin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University)
Oh, Hae-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University)
Kim, Jin-Chul (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University)
Kil, Yong-Gab (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University)
Kim, Kyoung-Soo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University)
Kim, Jwa-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.29, no.3, 2007 , pp. 255-261 More about this Journal
Abstract
Preface: Dental implant is important method that may solve the mastication, occlusion, esthetic, temporomandibular joint, and psychologic problem in oral and maxillofacial surgery. It is ideal that all of the implant are well positioned by adequate technique. By the way it‘s not always possible because of some anatomic, physiologic factor. In this case, If the implant can be moved to adequate position, it may be possible more esthetically and implanted patients more satisfied, but the majority of Implantists and orthodontists have thought that it is not possible. However, Implant, in fact, can be moved. and thus we can overcome the limit of implantation more. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the possibility of implant movement after corticotomy. Case report: Patient missed the upper right first molar. and implantation was done after completion of socket healing. We wait six months for osseointegration. Then, corticotomy was done under local anesthesia and close coil was used for orthodontic force. After traction during 3 weeks, we find the change of implant position at horizontal plane. we can not see the degenerative change on adjacent structure and tracted implant. there is a clinical mobility on upper right second premolar that used for anchorage but it subside spontaneously at the timing of prosthetic restoration without additional treatment. Discussion: As we could have some knowledge with this experiment, we report the case of implant movement after corticotomy and suggest a method about more esthetic implant treatment with a review of literature.
Keywords
Corticotomy; Implant; Orthodontic movement;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Block MS, Akin R, Chang A et al : Skeletal and dental movements after anterior maxillary advancement using implant-supported distraction osteogenesis in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55 : 1433, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Park HS, Kwon OW, Sung JH : Nonextraction treatment of an open bite with microscrew implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 : 391, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Wehrbein H, Diedrich P : Endosseous titanium implants during and after orthodontic load-an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res 4 : 76, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Misch CE : Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone in the Human Mandible : Implication for Dental Implant Treatment Planning and Surgical Placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57 : 700, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW : Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130 : 18, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Laster Z, Rachmiel A, Jensen OT : Alveolar Width Distraction Osteogenesis for Early Implant Placement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 : 1724, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kato S, Kato M : Intrusion of molars with implants as anchorage: a report of two cases. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 8 : 100, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Zechner W, Bernhart T, Zauza K et al : Multidimensional osteodistraction for correction of implant malposition in edentulous segments. Clin Oral Implants Res 12 : 531, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Sclar AG : Strategies for management of single-tooth extraction sites in aesthetic implant therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62 : 90, 2004   PUBMED
10 Peterson LJ, Indresano AT, Marciani RD et al : Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1st ed Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Company, 1992, p.919
11 Chen F, Terada K, Hanada K et al : Anchorage effect of osseointegrated vs nonosseointegrated palatal implants. Angle Orthod 76 : 660, 2006   PUBMED
12 Garcia-Garcia A, Somoza-Martin M : Bone distraction versus dynamic guided bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 : 724, 2005   PUBMED
13 Rygh P, Moxham BJ, Berkovitz BKB : The effects of external forces on the periodontal ligament-the response to horizontal loads. In Berkovitz BKB, Moxham BJ, Newman HN, editors : The periodontal ligamen in health and disease. Oxford, Pergamon Press 1982, p.269
14 Gedrange T, Boening K, Harzer W : Orthodontic implants as anchorage appliances for unilateral mesialization: a case report. Quintessence Int 37 : 485, 2006   PUBMED
15 Neyt LF, De Clercq C, Abeloos JV et al : Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with a combination of sinus augmentation, onlay bone grafting, and implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55 : 1397, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Peterson LJ, Indresano AT, Marciani RD et al : Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1st ed Philadelphia, JB Lippincott Company, 1992, p.9
17 Reitan K : Biomechanical principles and reactions. In Graber TM, Swain BF, editors : Orthodontics, current principles and techniques, St Louis, Mosby, 1985, p.11
18 Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J : Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implant subjected to static load. Clin Oral Impl Res 12 : 1, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Hu J, Li J, Wang D et al : Differences in mandibular distraction osteogenesis after corticotomy and osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 31 : 185, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn