Browse > Article

MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT WITH DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS FOR ADULT CLASS II MALOCCLUSION PATIENT WITH CONDYLAR RESORPTION  

Paeng, Jun-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Lee, Sang-Woo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, Jin-Yong (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Myoung, Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Hwang, Soon-Jung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Seo, Byoung-Moo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Choi, Jin-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Choung, Pill-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Kim, Myung-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.29, no.3, 2007 , pp. 217-226 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Distraction osteogenesis is considered to take favorable effect on the TMJ and be beneficial to prevent the relapse after the mandibular advancement of Class II malocclusion patient. This is the report with literature review on the mandibular advancement in the patients showing preoperative condylar resorption and who need larger amount of advancement. Patients and method: Distraction osteogenesis using intraoral device was performed for three mandibular hypoplasia patients (one male and two females). All patients were adult over 18 years old. The patients showed condylar bony resorption preoperatively. The distraction was performed intraorally with modified SSRO. After 7 days of latency period, activation was performed at the rate of 1.0 mm/day with twice turn. The devices were removed after 4-8 month consolidation period. Results: Total advancement of mandible was average 13 mm. One patient showed openbite immediately after removal of distraction device. It took long time to guide the openbite with elastics. The comparison between cephalometries immediately after device removal and postoperative six month revealed average 3.4 mm relapse. This means that mandibular advancement with distraction osteogenesis needs overcorrection and elastic rehabilitation even after enough consolidation periods. Conclusion: Larger amount of mandibular advancement could be achieved with distraction osteogenesis in severe mandibular hypoplasia with condylar resorption. However, some relapse was found during the follow-up period and the over correction is considered to be needed. The effect of distraction osteogenesis seems to be investigated with long-term follow-up.
Keywords
Distraction osteogenesis; Condyle resorption; Mandibular retrognathism;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Huang CS and Ross RB : Surgical advancement of the retrognathic mandible in growing children. Am J Orthod 82 : 89, 1982   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Hu J, Tang Z, Wang D and Buckley MJ : Changes in the inferior alveolar nerve after mandibular lengthening with different rates of distraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59 : 1041, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Mackool RJ, Hopper RA, Grayson BH, Holliday R and McCarthy JG : Volumetric change of the medial pterygoid following distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: an example of the associated soft-tissue changes. Plast Reconstr Surg 111 : 1804, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Williams JK, Rowe NM, Mackool RJ, et al. : Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible, Part II: Laboratory studies of sagittal (anteroposterior) and vertical (superoinferior) movements. J Craniofac Surg 9 : 504, 1998   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
5 Kunz C, Hammer B and Prein J : Manipulation of callus after linear distraction: a "lifeboat"or an alternative to multivectorial distraction osteogenesis of the mandible? Plast.Reconstr Surg 105 : 674, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Hoffmeister B, Marcks C and Wolff KP : The floating bone concept in intraoral mandibular distraction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg (Suppl) 26 : 76, 1998
7 Samchukov ML, Cope JB, Harper RP and Ross JD : Biomechanical considerations of mandibular lengthening and widening by gradual distraction using a computer model. J.Oral Maxillofac.Surg 56 : 51, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Van Sickels JE : A comparative study of bicortical screws and suspension wires versus bicortical screws in large mandibular advancements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49 : 1293, 1991   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Reynolds ST, Ellis E, 3rd and Carlson DS : Adaptation of the suprahyoid muscle complex to large mandibular advancements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46 : 1077, 1988   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Rozenthal W : Kiefergelenksankylose und Mikrogenie. Dtsche Zahnaerztl Z 4 : 786, 1949
11 Michieli S and Miotti B : Lengthening of mandibular body by gradual surgical-orthodontic distraction. J Oral Surg 35 : 187, 1977   PUBMED
12 Molina F and Ortiz MF : Mandibular elongation and remodeling by distraction: a farewell to major osteotomies. Plast Reconstr Surg 96 : 825, 1995   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
13 Fisher E, Staffenberg DA, McCarthy JG, Miller DC and Zeng J : Histopathologic and biochemical changes in the muscles affected by distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 99 : 366, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Walker DA : Management of severe mandibular retrognathia in the adult patient using distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 : 1341, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Herford AS, Hoffman R, Demirdji S, et al. : A comparison of synovial fluid pressure after immediate versus gradual mandibular advancement in the miniature pig. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63 : 775, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Grayson BH, McCormick S, Santiago PE and McCarthy JG : Vector of device placement and trajectory of mandibular distraction. J Craniofac Surg 8 : 473, 1997   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
17 Bouwman JP, Kerstens HC and Tuinzing DB : Condylar resorption in orthognathic surgery. The role of intermaxillary fixation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 78 : 138, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Simpson AH, Williams PE, Kyberd P, Goldspink G and Kenwright J : The response of muscle to leg lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77 : 630, 1995   PUBMED
19 Choi JY, Hwang KG, Baek SH, et al. : Original sagittal split osteotomy revisited for mandibular distraction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 29 : 165, 2001   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
20 Makarov MR, Harper RP, Cope JB and Samchukov ML : Evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve function during distraction osteogenesis in the dog. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56 : 1417, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Hoppenreijs TJ, van der Linden FP, Freihofer HP, et al. : Occlusal and functional conditions after surgical correction of anterior open bite deformities 8. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 11: 29, 1996   PUBMED
22 Will LA and West RA : Factors influencing the stability of the sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 47 : 813, 1989   DOI   PUBMED
23 Klein C and Howaldt HP : Correction of mandibular hypoplasia by means of bidirectional callus distraction. J Craniofac Surg 7 : 258, 1996   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
24 van Strijen PJ, Breuning KH, Becking AG and Tuinzing DB : Stability after distraction osteogenesis to lengthen the mandible: results in 50 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62 : 304, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Van Sickels JE, Dolce C, Keeling S, et al.: Technical factors accounting for stability of a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy advancement: wire osteosynthesis versus rigid fixation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 89 : 19, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Moore KE, Gooris PJ and Stoelinga PJ : The contributing role of condylar resorption to skeletal relapse following mandibular advancement surgery: report of five cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49 : 448, 1991   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Diner PA, Kollar EM, Martinez H and Vazquez M : Intraoral distraction for mandibular lengthening: a technical innovation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 24 : 92, 1996   PUBMED
28 McDonald WR : Stability of mandibular lengthening: a comparison of moderate and large advancements. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2 : 729, 1990
29 Shardt-Sacco, Turvey TA and Proffit WR : Stability of large advancements greater than 8 mm. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54(suppl) : 105, 1996
30 van Strijen PJ, Breuning KH, Becking AG, Perdijk FB and Tuinzing DB : Complications in bilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using internal devices. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 96 : 392, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Hoppenreijs TJ, Freihofer HP, Stoelinga PJ, Tuinzing DB and van't Hof MA : Condylar remodelling and resorption after Le Fort I and bimaxillary osteotomies in patients with anterior open bite. A clinical and radiological study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27 : 81, 1998   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
32 Thurmuller P, Troulis MJ, Rosenberg A, Chuang SK and Kaban LB : Microscopic changes in the condyle and disc in response to distraction osteogenesis of the minipig mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64 : 249, 2006   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
33 McCarthy JG, Williams JK, Grayson BH and Crombie JS : Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible: device development and clinical application. J Craniofac Surg 9 : 322, 1998   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
34 Kerstens HC, Tuinzing DB, Golding RP and van der Kwast WA : Condylar atrophy and osteoarthrosis after bimaxillary surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 69 : 274, 1990   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Altuna G, Walker DA and Freeman E : Rapid orthopedic lengthening of the mandible in primates by sagittal split osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis: a pilot study. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 10 : 59, 1995   PUBMED
36 McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH and Grayson BH : Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89 : 1, 1992
37 Schumacher B, Keller J and Hvid I : Distraction effects on muscle. Leg lengthening studied in rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand 65 : 647, 1994   DOI   PUBMED
38 Hollier LH, Rowe NM, Mackool RJ, et al. : Controlled multiplanar distraction of the mandible. Part III: Laboratory studies of sagittal (anteroposterior) and horizontal (mediolateral) movements. J Craniofac Surg 11 : 83, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Castano FJ, Troulis MJ, Glowacki J, Kaban LB and Yates KE : Proliferation of masseter myocytes after distraction osteogenesis of the porcine mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 59 : 302, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Snyder CC, Levine GA, Swanson HM and Browne EZ, Jr. : Mandibular lengthening by gradual distraction. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 51 : 506, 1973   DOI   ScienceOn