Browse > Article

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF ALVEOLAR DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS FOR IMPLANT INSTALLATION  

Paeng, Jun-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Myoung, Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Hwang, Soon-Jung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Seo, Byoung-Moo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Choi, Jin-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Choung, Pill-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Kim, Myung-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.28, no.4, 2006 , pp. 329-338 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objectives: Distraction osteogenesis has recently evolved a challenging technique to overcome the limitations of conventional augmentation procedures. The aim of this report was to evaluate the clinical result of alveolar distraction osteogenesis for implant installation. Methods: Twenty five patients with alveolar ridge deficiencies were treated with vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis by intraoral device (total 27 devices: 25 extraosseous and 2 intraosseous devices). After the latency periods of 5-7 days, activation of the device was started. The distraction rhythm and rate was 0.75-1.0 mm a day with 2 or 3 times a day. After 3-4 months, dental implants were placed with removing the distractor simultaneously. Results: On average, a vertical gain of $9.8{\pm}3.4\;mm$ was obtained by distraction osteogenesis. Total 84 implants were installed. Average follow up period was $13.5{\pm}7.5$ months. No implant was removed during the follow up period. Three patients showed infection during the distraction osteogenesis. Three devices were broken and 2 devices among them were replaced with new one. Conclusion: Relatively larger amount of alveolar bone augmentation could be obtained with distraction osteogenesis. For the ideal anatomically and functionally ideal regeneration of alveolar bone to install dental implant, the complication of distraction should be controlled.
Keywords
Distraction osteogenesis; Dental implant; Alveolar bone regeneration;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Block MS, Chang A, Crawford C : Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54 : 309, 1996   DOI
2 Ilizarov GA : The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 249, 1989
3 Gaggl A, Schultes G, Karcher H : Distraction implants: a new operative technique for alveolar ridge augmentation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 27 : 214, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Urbani G : Alveolar distraction before implantation: a report of five cases and a review of the literature. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 21 : 569, 2001
5 Gaggl A, Schultes G, Rainer H et al : The transgingival approach for placement of distraction implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 : 793, 2002   DOI
6 Ray RD : Vascularization of bone grafts and implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 87 : 43, 1972
7 Farhadieh RD, Gianoutsos MP, Dickinson R et al : Effect of distraction rate on biomechanical, mineralization, and histologic properties of an ovine mandible model. Plast Reconstr Surg 105 : 889, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Perry M, Hodges N, Hallmon DW et al : Distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay grafting. Part I: outcome of implant integration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20 : 695, 2005
9 Garcia-Garcia A, Somoza-Martin M, Gandara-Vila P et al : Alveolar distraction before insertion of dental implants in the posterior mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41 : 376, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Burchardt H : The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 28, 1983
11 Uckan S, Haydar SG, Dolanmaz D : Alveolar distraction: analysis of 10 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 94 : 561, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Enislidis G, Fock N, Millesi-Schobel G et al : Analysis of complications following alveolar distraction osteogenesis and implant placement in the partially edentulous mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 100 : 25, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Nosaka Y, Kitano S, Wada K et al : Endosseous implants in horizontal alveolar ridge distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17 : 846, 2002
14 Troulis MJ, Glowacki J, Perrott DH et al : Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58 : 507, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Casentini P et al : Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 1-3-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 15 : 82, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Jensen OT, Cockrell R, Kuhike L et al : Anterior maxillary alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a prospective 5-year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17 : 52, 2002
17 Chin M, Toth BA : Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: review of five cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54 : 45, 1996   DOI
18 Robiony M, Polini F, Costa F et al : Osteogenesis distraction and platelet-rich plasma for bone restoration of the severely atrophic mandible: preliminary results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 : 630, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Zaffe D, Bertoldi C, Palumbo C et al : Morphofunctional and clinical study on mandibular alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Clin Oral Implants Res 13 : 550, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Papageorge MB: Distraction osteogenesis for augmentation of the deficient alveolar ridge. J Mass Dent Soc 51 : 24, 2002
21 Gaggl A, Schultes G, Karcher H : Vertical alveolar ridge distraction with prosthetic treatable distractors: a clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 : 701, 2000
22 Kunkel M, Wahlmann U, Reichert TE et al : Reconstruction of mandibular defects following tumor ablation by vertical distraction osteogenesis using intraosseous distraction devices. Clin Oral Implants Res 16 : 89, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Polo WC, Cury PR, Sendyk WR et al : Posterior mandibular alveolar distraction osteogenesis utilizing an extraosseous distractor: a prospective study. J Periodontol 76 : 1463, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Ilizarov GA : The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 263, 1989
25 McAllister BS, Gaffaney TE : Distraction osteogenesis for vertical bone augmentation prior to oral implant reconstruction. Periodontol 2000 33 : 54, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
26 McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N et al : Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89 : 1, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn