Browse > Article

MORPHOLOGIC STUDY FOR SAGITTAL SPLIT RAMUS OSTEOTOMY USING 3-D IMAGE IN MANDIBULAR PROGNATHISM  

Park, Chung-Ryoul (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
Oh, Hee-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.27, no.4, 2005 , pp. 350-359 More about this Journal
Abstract
Sagittal split ramus osteotomy(SSRO) has been commonly performed in the mandibular prognathism. The previous studies of the mandibular anatomy for SSRO have mostly been used in dry skull without consideration of age, sex or jaw relationship of patients. This study was performed to evaluate the location of mandibular canal and the anatomy of ramus, such as the location of mandibular lingula and the ramal bone marrow, which were associated with SSRO procedures, in the patients with mandibular prognathism and normal young adults by using computerized tomographs(CT) and 3D images. The young adults at their twenties, who were considered to complete their skeletal growth, and seen in the Department of Orthodontics and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in Chonnam National University Hospital between March 2000 and May 2003, were selected. This study was performed in 30 patients (15men, 15women) who were diagnosed as skeletal class I normal relationship, and another 30 patients (15men, 15women) who were diagnosed as skeletal class III relationship upon clinical examination and lateral cephalometric radiographs. The patients were divided into 2 groups : Class I group, the patients who had skeletal class Ⅰ normal relationship(n=30, 15men, 15women), and Class III group, the patients who had skeletal class III relationship(n=30, 15men, 15women). Facial CT was taken in all patients, and pure 3D mandibular model was constructed by V-works version 4.0. The occlusal plane was designed by three points, such as the mesiobuccal cusp of both mandibular 1st molar and the incisal edge of the right mandibular central incisor, and used as a reference plane. Distances between the tip of mandibular lingula and the occlusal plane, the sigmoid notch, the anterior and the posterior borders of ramus were measured. The height of ramal bone marrow from the occlusal plane and the distance between mid-point of mandibular canal and the buccal or lingual cortex of the mandible in the 1st and 2nd molars were measured by V-works version 4.0. Distance(Li-OP) between the occlusal plane and the tip of mandibular lingula of Class III Group was longer than that of Class I Group in men(p<0.01), but there was no significant difference in women between both groups. Distance(Li-SN) between the sigmoid notch and the tip of mandibular ligula of Class III group was longer than that of Class I Group in men(p<0.05), but there was no significant difference in women between both groups. Distance(Li-RA) between the anterior border of ramus and the tip of mandibular lingula of Class III Group was shorter than that of Class I Group in men and women(p<0.01). Distance(Li-RP) between the posterior border of ramus and the tip of mandibular lingula of Class III Group was slightly shorter than that of Class I Group in men(p<0.05), but there was no significant difference in women between both groups. Distance(RA-RP) between the anterior and the posterior borders of ramus of Class III Group was shorter than that of Class I Group in men and women(p<0.01). Longer the distance(SN-AN) between the sigmoid notch and the antegonial notch was, longer the vertical ramal length above occlusal plane, higher the location of mandibular lingula, and shorter the antero-posterior ramal length were observed(p<0.01). Height of ramal bone marrow of Class III Group was higher than that of Class I Group in men and women(p<0.01). Distance between mandibular canal and buccal cortex of Class III Group in 1st and 2nd lower molars was shorter than that of Class I Group in men and women (p<0.05 in 1st lower molar in men, p<0.01 in others). These results indicate that there are some anatomical differences between the normal occlusal patients and the mandibular prognathic patients, such as the anterior-posterior length of ramus, the height of ramal bone marrow, and the location of mandibular canal.
Keywords
Mandibular prognathism; 3-D image; BSSRO;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Trauner R, Obwegeser H : The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty, part 1: Surgical procedure to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 10 : 677, 1957   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Epker BN : Modification in the sagittal osteotomy of the mandible. J Oral Surg 35 : 157, 1977   PUBMED
3 Jeter TS, Van Sickels JE, Dolwick MF : Modified techniques for internal fixation of sagittal ramus osteotomies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42 : 270, 1984   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Epker BN, Wolford LM, Fish LC : Mandibular deficiency syndrome. Surgical considerations for mandibular advancement. Oral Surg 45 : 349, 1968   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Steinhauser EW : Bone screws and plates in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Surg 11 : 209, 1982   DOI   PUBMED
6 Simpson W : Problems incountered in the sagittal split operation. Int J Oral Surg 10 : 81, 1981   DOI   PUBMED
7 Van de Perre JPA, Stoelinga PJW, Blijdorp PA et al : Perioperative morbidity in maxillofacial orthopaedic surgery: a retrospective study. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 24 : 263, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Acebal-Bianco F, Vuylsteke PLPJ, Mommaerts MY et al : Perioperative complications in corrective facial orthopedic surgery: a 5-year retrospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58 :754, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Rajchel J, Ellis III E, Fonseca RJ : The anatomical location of the mandiblurar canal: its relationship to the sagittal ramus osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1 : 37, 1986
10 Carter RB, Keen EN : The intramandibular course of the inferior alveolar nerve. J Anat 108 : 433, 1971   PUBMED
11 Paulus GW, Steinhauser EW : A comparative study of wire osteosynthesis versus bone screws in the treatment of mandiblular prognathism. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 54 : 2, 1982   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Turvey TA : Intraoperative complications of sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular ramus, incidence and management. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43 : 504, 1985   DOI   PUBMED
13 de Varies K, Devriese PP, Hovinga J et al : Facial palsy after sagittal split osteotomy. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 21 : 50, 1993   DOI
14 Nortje CJ : Variations in the normal anatomy of the inferior dental canal: a retrospective study of panoramic radiographs from 3612 routine dental patients. Br J Oral Surg 15 : 55, 1977   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
15 Muto T, Shigeo K, Yamamoto K et al : Computed tomography morphology of the mandibular ramus in prognathism: effect on the medial osteotomy of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61 : 89, 2003   PUBMED
16 Kim HJ, Lee HY, Chung IH et al : Mandibular anatomy related to sagittal split ramus osteotomy in Koreans. Yonsei Med J 38 : 19, 1997   DOI
17 Bell WH, Schendel SA : Biologic basis for modification of the sagittal ramus split operation. J Oral Surg 35 : 362, 1977   PUBMED
18 Palmen E : Facial nerve paralysis following a sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible. Quintessence Chicago 418, 1985
19 Olivier E : The inferior dental canal and its nerve in the adult. Br Dent Assoc J 49 : 356, 1928
20 Van Sickels J, Flanary CM : Stability associated with mandibular advancement treated by rigid osseous fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43 : 338, 1985   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Suhr CH, Nahm DS, Chang YI : Epidemiologic study of the prevalence of malocclusion in Koreans. J Korean Assoc Orthod 14 : 33, 1984
22 Tom WK, Martone HM, Mintz SM : A study of mandibular ramus anatomy and its significance to sagittal split osteotomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26 : 176, 1997   PUBMED
23 Souyris F : Sagittal splitting and bicortical screw fixation of the ascending ramus. J Maxillofac Surg 6 : 198, 1978   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
24 Martis CS : Complications after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42 : 101, 1984   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Wolford LM, Bennett MA, Rafferty CG : Modification of the mandibular ramus sagittal split osteotomy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 64 : 146, 1987   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Starkie C, Stewart D : The intramandibular course of the inferior dental nerve. J Anat 65 : 319, 1931   PUBMED
27 Smith BR, Rajchel JL, Waite DE et al : Mandibular ramus anatomy as it relates to the medial osteotomy of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49 : 112, 1991   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Kang HK, Yoo YK : A study on the prevalence of malocclusion of Yonsei University students in 1991. Seoul, Graduate School. Yonsei University, Dept Dental Science, 12, 1991
29 Piecuch JF, Lewis RA : Facial nerve injury as a complication of sagittal split ramus osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40 : 309, 1982   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Dal Pont G : Retromolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism. J Oral Surg 19 : 42, 1961   DOI   ScienceOn