Browse > Article

CLINICAL STUDY ON SUCCESS RATE OF TG OSSEOTITE IMPLANT  

Oh, Sung-Hwan (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Min, Seung-Ki (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Chae, Young-Won (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Publication Information
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery / v.27, no.1, 2005 , pp. 39-47 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to review the prognosis of the TG Osseotite implant(3i Co, USA) placed in partial edentulous area of oral cavity and to suspect the possible causes leading to failure. 124 TG Osseotite implants that had been inserted between 2000 - 2002 were followed up for 2 years(avg : 9.5 months) in function. Medical records, and radiographs were evaluated and analyzed by the over all success rate, gender and age factor, general disease, implant fixture length and diameter, implant site, bone density, and various surgical methods. Chi square test was used statistically. Of the 124 TG Osseotite implants, 9 implants(7.3%) were removed in early phase and 3 implants(2.4%) were in late phase. The cumulative survival rate was 90.2%. The failure of the TG Osseotite implant was closely related with the use of bone graft techniques such as sinus elevation or immediate implantation and not with the age, sex, general disease, implant site, bone density of implanted site. The failure of the TG Osseotite implant was well developed when it was the wide type of implant and it was inserted for single tooth replacement. The developement of peri-implantitis was the most important factor in the failure of the TG Osseotite implant.
Keywords
TG Osseotite implant; Success Rate;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Lazzara RJ, Testori Testori T, Trisi P, Porter SS, Weinsteim RL : A human histolgic analysis of oseotite and machined surface using implants with two opposing surface. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 19 : 3, 1999
2 Garrett NR, Kapur KK, Hasse AL : Veterans administration cooperative dental implant study. Part V. Comparisons of pre treatment and post treatment dietary intakes. J Prosthet Dent 77 : 153, 1997   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A : Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 8 : 161, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Behneke A, Behneke N, Wagner W : Hard and soft tissue reaction to ITI screw implants. 3-year longitudinal results of a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12 : 749, 1997   PUBMED
5 Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, Porter S : Multicenter study of osseotite implant: 4-year longitudinal report. Int J Oral Macillofac Implants 16 : 193, 2001
6 Brunel G, Benque E, Elhara F, Sansac C, Duffort JF : Gueded bone regeneration for immediate non-submerged implant placement using bioabsorbable materials in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implant Res 9 : 303, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Sullivan DT, Sherwood RL, Porter SS : Long-term performance of osseotite implants : A 6-year clinical follow-up. Compendium April 2001. vol. 22, No 4, 326
8 JS Kim, HH Chang : Preprothetic stage dental implant failure. JKAOMS 2 : 178, 2001
9 Nishimura K, Itoh T, Takaki K, Hosokawa R, Naito T, Yokota M : Periodontal parameters of osseointegrated dental implants. Clinical Oral Implant Research 8 : 272, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Zarb G, Schmitt : A longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implant. J Oral Maxillofac Implant 55 : 220, 1998
11 Jendresen MD, Allen EP, Bayne SC, Donovan TE : Annual review of selected dental literature ; Report of the committee on scientific investigation for the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 80 : 81, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Lundqvist S, Haraldson T : Occlusal perception of thickness in patients with bridges on osseointegrated oral implants. Scand J Dent Res 92 : 88, 1984   PUBMED
13 Misch CE : A key determinant for clinical success in; Misch CE(eds) Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis, Mosby Co. 1999, pp 109
14 Park JY, Davis JE : Red blood cell and platelet interaction with titanium implant surface. Clin Oral Impl Res 11 : 530, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Lekholm U, Gunne J : Survival of Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws. A 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 : 639, 1999   PUBMED
16 Zarb G, Schmitt A : Edentulous predicament, I. A prospective study of the effectiveness of implant supported fixed prothesis. J Am Dent Assoc 127 : 59, 1996   DOI   PUBMED
17 Sullivan DY, Sherwood RL, Mai TN : Preliminary results of a multicenter study evaluating a chemically enhanced surface for machined commercially pure titanium implants. J Prosthet Dent 78 : 379, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Davis JE : Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 11 : 391, 1998   PUBMED
19 Branema PI, Briene U, Adell R, Hanssen, B, Lindstrom J, Olsson A : Intra osseous anchorage of dental prothesis.I Experimental studies: Scand J Plast Reconst Surgy 3 : 61, 1969   DOI
20 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI : A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment fo the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surgery 10 : 387, 1981   DOI
21 Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Andersson B, Albrektsson T : A 1-year follow up of implants if differing surface roughmess inserted in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12 : 486, 1997   PUBMED
22 Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adashi M, Caputo AM : Osseointegration enhanced by chemical stching if the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 442, 1997
23 Branemak PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A : Osseointegrated implant in the treatment of the edentulous jaw: Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconst Surg suppl 16, 1997
24 Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E : Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mat Res 29 : 1567, 1995   DOI
25 Haas R, Mensdorff-poui N : Survival of 1920. IMZ implants followed for up to 100 month. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5 : 581, 1996
26 Godfredsen K, Wennerberg A, Johansson C, Skovgaard LT, Hjortings-Hansen E : Anchorage of Ti-O2 blasted, HA-coated and machined implants : An Experimental study with rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res 29 : 1223, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Buser D, Schenk PK, Steinemann SG, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H : Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants: A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25 : 889, 1991   DOI   PUBMED
28 Grunder U, Gaberthuel T, Boitel N, Imoberdorf M, Meyenberg K, Andreoni C et al : Evaluating the clinical performance of osseotite implant in maxillary and mandibular posterior area. Compendium 20 : 628, 1999
29 Albreksson T, Zarb G. : The longterm efficiency of currently used implants : A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 5 : 581, 1996