Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20160041

Effects of Photoperiod, Light Intensity and Electrical Conductivity on the Growth and Yield of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in a Closed-type Plant Factory System  

Austin, Jirapa (Major of Horticultural Science, Jeju National University)
Jeon, Youn A (Major of Horticultural Science, Jeju National University)
Cha, Mi-Kyung (Major of Plant Resources and Environment, Jeju National University)
Park, Sookuk (Major of Horticultural Science, Jeju National University)
Cho, Young-Yeol (Major of Horticultural Science, Jeju National University)
Publication Information
Horticultural Science & Technology / v.34, no.3, 2016 , pp. 405-413 More about this Journal
Abstract
Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is a plant native to the Andean region that has become increasing popular as a food source due to its high nutritional content. This study determined the optimal photoperiod, light intensity, and electrical conductivity (EC) of the nutrient solution for growth and yield of quinoa in a closed-type plant factory system. The photoperiod effects were first analyzed in a growth chamber using three different light cycles, 8/16, 14/10, and 16/8 hours (day/night). Further studies, performed in a closed-type plant factory system, evaluated nutrient solutions with EC (salinity) levels of 1.0, 2.0 or $3.0dS{\cdot}m^{-1}$. These experiments were assayed with two light intensities (120 and $143{\mu}mol{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$) under a 12/12 and 14/10 hours (day/night) photoperiod. The plants grown under the 16/8 hours photoperiod did not flower, suggesting that a long-day photoperiod delays flowering and that quinoa is a short-day plant. Under a 12/12 h photoperiod, the best shoot yield (both fresh and dry weights) was observed at an EC of $2.0dS{\cdot}m^{-1}$ and a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of $120{\mu}mol{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$. With a 14/10 h photoperiod, the shoot yield (both fresh and dry weights), plant height, leaf area, and light use efficiency were higher when grown with an EC of $2.0dS{\cdot}m^{-1}$ and a PPFD of $143{\mu}mol{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$. Overall, the optimal conditions for producing quinoa as a leafy vegetable, in a closed-type plant factory system, were a 16/8 h (day/night) photoperiod with an EC of $2.0dS{\cdot}m^{-1}$ and a PPFD of $143{\mu}mol{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$.
Keywords
flowering rate; light use efficiency; nutrient solution; plant height; productivity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kitaya Y, Niu G, Kozai T, Ohashi M (1998) Photosynthetic photon flux, photoperiod, and $CO_2$ concentration affect growth and morphology of lettuce plug transplants. HortScience 33:988-911
2 Akmal M, Janssens MJJ (2004). Productivity and light use efficiency of perennial ryegrass with contrasting water and nitrogen supplies. Field Crops Res 88:143-155. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2003.12.004   DOI
3 Bertero HD (2001) Effects of photoperiod, temperature and radiation on the rate of leaf appearance in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under field conditions. Ann Bot 87:495-502. doi:10.1006/anbo.2000.1362   DOI
4 Bertero HD, King RW, Hall AJ (1999a) Modelling photoperiod and temperature responses of flowering in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Field Crops Res 63:19-34. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00024-6   DOI
5 Bertero HD, King RW, Hall AJ (1999b) Photoperiod-sensitive development phases in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Field Crops Res 60:231-243. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00128-2   DOI
6 Kowalczyk K, Gajc-Wolska J, Rutkowska M (2012) Effect of the nutrient solution electrical conductivity (EC) on the growth, development and quality of endive (Cichorum endivia L.) cultivate under covers. Acta Hortic 927:339-344. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.927.40   DOI
7 Lee JH, Heuvelink E (2003) Simulation of leaf area development based on dry matter partitioning and specific leaf area for cut chrysanthemum. Ann Bot 91:319-327. doi:10.1093/aob/mcg015   DOI
8 Morimoto T, Torii T, Hashimoto Y (1995) Optimal control of physiological processes of plants in a green plant factory. Control Eng Pract 3:505-511. doi:10.1016/0967-0661(95)00022-M   DOI
9 Park KW, Won JH, Chiang MH (1995) Effects of nutrient solution and ionic strength on growth in chicory. Acta Hortic 396:187-194. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.396.22
10 Pasko P, Barton H, Zagrodzki P, Gorinstein S, Folta M, Zachwieja ZZ (2009) Anthocyanins, total polyphenols and antioxidant activity in amaranth and quinoa seeds and sprouts during their growth. Food Chem 115:994-998. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.01.037   DOI
11 Qin L, Guo S, Ai W, Tang Y (2008) Selection of candidate salad vegetables for controlled ecological life support system. Adv. Space Res. 41:768-772. doi:10.1016/j.asr.2007.09.037   DOI
12 Ruiz RA, Bertero HD (2008) Light interception and radiation use efficiency in temperate quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. Eur J Agron 29:144-152. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2008.05.003   DOI
13 Sarooshi RA, Cresswell GC (1994) Effects of hydroponic solution composition, electrical conductivity and plant spacing on yield and quality of strawberries. Aust J Exp Agri 34:529-535. doi:10.1071/EA9940529   DOI
14 D'Anna F, Miceli A, Vetrano F (2003) First results of floating system cultivation of Eruca sativa L. Acta Hortic 609:361-364. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.609.54   DOI
15 Carlo F, Youssef R, Elvira R, Alberto B, Giuseppe C (2009) Nutrient solution concentration and growing season affect yield and quality of Lactuca sativa L. var. acephala in floating raft culture. J Sci Food Agri 89:1682-1689. doi:10.1002/jsfa.3641   DOI
16 Carrasco G, Ramirez P, Vogel H (2007) Effect of the electrical conductivity of the nutrient solution on yield and essential oil in basil grown by NFT. IDESIA (Chile) 25:59-62
17 Cho YY (2004) Modeling of growth and yield of hydroponically grown pak-choi plants (Brassica campestris L. ssp. chinensis Jusl.). Ph.D. Diss., Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
18 Cho YY, Choi KY, Lee YB, Son JE (2012) Growth characteristics of sowthistle (Ixeris dentata Nakai) under different levels of light intensity, electrical conductivity of nutrient solution, and planting density in a plant factory. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 53:368-372. doi:10.1007/s13580-012-0691-1   DOI
19 Costa PC, Didone EB, Sesso TM, Canizares KAL, Goto R (2001) Electrical conductivity of nutrient solution and hydroponic crisp-head lettuce yield. Sci Agric 58:595-597. doi:10.1590/S0103-90162001000300023   DOI
20 Gawlik-Dziki U, Swiecaa M, Sulkowski M, Dziki D, Baraniaka B, Czyz J (2013) Antioxidant and anticancer activities of Chenopodium quinoa leaves extracts-In vitro study. Food Chem Toxicol 57:154-160. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2013.03.023   DOI
21 Gesinski K (2008) Evaluation of the development and yielding potential of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. under the climatic conditions of Europe. Part Two: Yielding potential of Chenopodium quinoa under different conditions. Acta Agrobot 61:185-189. doi:10.5586/aa.2008.026   DOI
22 Udagawa Y (1995) Some responses of dill (Anethum graveolens ) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris ) grown in hydroponics, to the concentration of nutrient solution. Acta Hortic 396:203-210. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.396.24   DOI
23 Schlick G (2000) Nutritional characteristics and biomass production of Chenopodium quinoa grown in controlled environments. M.S. Theses. San Jose State University, California, USA
24 Seo MW, Yang DS, Kays SJ, Kim JH, Woo JH, Park KW (2009) Effects of nutrient solution electrical conductivity and sulfur, magnesium, and phosphorus concentration on sesquiterpene lactones in hydroponically grown lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). Sci Hortic 122:369-374. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2009.06.013   DOI
25 Shabala S, Hariadi Y, Jacobsen SE (2013) Genotypic difference in salinity tolerance in quinoa is determined by differential control of xylem $Na^+$ loading and stomatal density. J Plant Physiol 170:906-914. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2013.01.014   DOI
26 Wu M, Kubota C (2008) Effects of high electrical conductivity of nutrient solution and its application timing on lycopene, chlorophyll and sugar concentrations of hydroponic tomatoes during ripening. Sci Hortic 116:122-129. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1995.396.24   DOI