Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7235/hort.2014.13138

Assessment of Chilling Injury and Molecular Marker Analysis in Cucumber Cultivars (Cucumis sativus L.)  

Ali, Asjad (Department of Life Science, Dongguk University-Seoul)
Yang, Eun Mi (Department of Life Science, Dongguk University-Seoul)
Bang, Sun Woong (Department of Life Science, Dongguk University-Seoul)
Chung, Sang-Min (Department of Life Science, Dongguk University-Seoul)
Staub, Jack E. (USDA, ARS, Forage and Range Research Laboratory)
Publication Information
Horticultural Science & Technology / v.32, no.2, 2014 , pp. 227-234 More about this Journal
Abstract
The responses to chilling temperature of 12 Korean cucumber varieties was compared to those of two U.S.A. (previously determined cold tolerant NC76 and 'Chipper'), and Chinese and Japanese germplasms. Seedlings of each entry were exposed to $4^{\circ}C$ (Experiment 1) and $1^{\circ}C$ (Experiments 2 and 3) at the first-true leaf stage for eight and nine hours, respectively, under 80% relative humidity (RH) and $149{\mu}moles{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$ photosynthetic photon flux (PPF). The chilling response [damage rating (DR)] of each accession was based on visual ratings (1 to 5) after treatment, where 1 = no damage, 2 = slight, 3 = moderate, 4 = advanced, and 5 = severe damage. Predictably the cumulative average DR of chilling tolerant line NC76 and 'Chipper' after chilling w as 1 and 1.1, respectively. Korean 'Nacdongchungjang' was most sensitive to chilling temperatures [DR = 2.3] when compared to the other entries examined. The sensitivity to chilling of 'Nacdongchungjang' was followed by Chinese 'Dongguan' [DR = 1.7]. In contrast, 'Saeronchungjang' (DR = 1) and 'Janghyungnachap' (DR = 1) were the most chilling tolerant of the Korean accessions examined and equivalent to the response of line NC76 and 'Chipper'. Nevertheless, chloroplast type genotyping of these accessions with known chilling-linked sdCAPS genomic markers revealed genotypic differences between chilling tolerant lines (NC76 and 'Chipper') and all Korean lines examined.
Keywords
abiotic stress; chloroplast genotypes; DNA marker; low temperature; sdCAPS;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kozik, E.U. and T.C. Wehner. 2008. A single dominant gene Ch for chilling resistance in cucumber seedlings. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 133:225-227.
2 Hughes, M.A. and M.A. Dunn. 1996. The molecular biology of plant acclimation to low temperature. J. Exp. Bot. 47:291-305.   DOI
3 Huner, N.P.A., G. Oquist, and F. Sarhan. 1998. Energy balance and acclimation to light and cold. Trends Plant Sci. 3:224-230.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Jackman, R.L., R.Y. Yada, A. Marangoni, K.L. Parkin, and D.W. Stanley. 1988. Chilling injury. A review of quality aspects. J. Food Sci. 11:253-277.
5 Kudoh, H. and K. Sonoike. 2002. Irreversible damage to photosystem I by chilling in light: Cause of the degradation of chlorophyll after returning to normal growth temperature. Planta 215:541-548.   DOI
6 Kuk, Y.I. and J.S. Shin. 2007. Mechanisms of low-temperature tolerance in cucumber leaves of various ages. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 132:294-301.
7 Nishida, I. and N. Murata. 1996. Chilling sensitivity in plants and cyanobacteria: The crucial contribution of membrane lipids. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47:541-568.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Saltveit, M.E. Jr. and L.L. Morris. 1990. Overview on chilling injury of horticultural crops, p. 3-15. In: C.Y. Wang (ed.). Chilling injury of horticultural crops. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
9 Smallwood, M. and D.J. Bowles. 2002. Plants in a cold climate. Philos Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 357:831-847.   DOI
10 Smeets, L. and T. Wehner. 1997. Environmental effects on genetic variation of chilling resistance in cucumber. Euphytica 97:217-225.   DOI
11 Sonoike, K. 1996a. Degradation of psaB gene product, the reaction center subunit of photosystem I, is caused during photo-inhibition of photosystem I: possible involvement of active oxygen species. Plant Sci. 115:157-164.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Synder, R.L. and J.P. Abreu. 2005. Frost protection: Fundamentals, practice and economics Vol. 1. FAO, Rome.
13 Sonoike, K. 1996b. Photoinhibition of photosystem I: Its physiological significance in the chilling sensitivity of plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 37:239-247.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Sonoike, K. 1998. Various aspects of inhibition of photosynthesis under light/chilling stress: "photoinhibition at chilling temperatures" versus "chilling damage in the light". J. Plant Res. 111:121-129.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Staub, J.E. and T.C. Wehner. 1996. Noninfectious disorders: Temperature stress, p. 66-87. In: T.A. Zitter, D.L. Hopkins, and C.E. Thomas (eds.). Compendium of cucurbit disease Part II. APS press, St. Paul, MN.
16 Thomashow, M.F. 1999. Plant cold acclimation: Freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50:571-599.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Brüggemann, W., T.A.W. van der Kooji, and P.R. van Hasselt. 1992. Long-term chilling of young tomato plants under low light and subsequent recovery. Planta 186:172-178.   DOI
18 Chung, S.-M., D.S. Decker-walters, and J.E. Staub. 2003a. Genetic relationships within the cucurbitaceae as assessed by ccssr marker and sequence analysis. Can. J. Botany 81:814-832.   DOI
19 Chung, S.-M., V.S. Gordon, and J.E. Staub. 2007. Sequencing cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) chloroplast genomes identifies differences between chilling-tolerant and -susceptible cucumber lines. Genome 50:215-225.   DOI
20 Fazio, G., S-M. Chung, and J.E. Staub. 2003. Comparative analysis of response to phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for multiple lateral branching in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 107:875-883.   DOI
21 Chung, S.-M., J.E. Staub, and G. Fazio. 2003b. Inheritance of chilling injury; A maternally inherited trait in cucumber. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 128:526-530.
22 Fan, Z., M.D. Robbins, and J.E. Staub. 2006. Population development by phenotypic selection with subsequent marker-assisted selection for line extraction in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 112:843-855.   DOI
23 Gordon, V.S. and J.E. Staub. 2011. Comparative analysis of chilling response in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) through plastidic and nuclear genetic component analysis. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 136:256-264.
24 Hetherington, S.E., J. He, and R.M. Smillie. 1989. Photoinhibition at low temperature in chilling-sensitive and resistant plants. Plant Physiol. 90:1609-1615.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Hetherington, S.E. and G. Oquist. 1988. Monitoring chilling injury:Comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, post-chilling growth and visible symptoms of injury in Zea mays. Plant Physiol. 72:241-247.   DOI
26 Horejsi, T. and J.E. Staub. 1999. Genetic variation in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) as assessed by random amplified polymorphic DNA. Genet. Res. Crop. Evol. 46:337-350.   DOI
27 Gomes, E., M.K. Jakobsen, K.B. Axelsen, M. Geisler, and M.G. Palmgren. 2000. Chilling tolerance in Arabidopsis involves ALA1, a member of a new family of putative aminophospholipid translocases. Plant Cell 12:2441-2454.   DOI
28 Ali, A., E.M. Yang, S.Y. Lee, and S.-M. Chung. 2013. Evaluation of chloroplast genotypes of Korean cucumber cultivars (Cucumis sativus L.) using sdCAPS markers related to chilling tolerance. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 31:219-223.   과학기술학회마을   DOI