Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3796/KSFOT.2019.55.1.039

A preliminary study on seabed classification using a scientific echosounder  

FAJARYANTI, Rina (Department of Maritime Police and Production System/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University)
KANG, Myounghee (Department of Maritime Police and Production System/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology / v.55, no.1, 2019 , pp. 39-49 More about this Journal
Abstract
Acoustics are increasingly regarded as a remote-sensing tool that provides the basis for classifying and mapping ocean resources including seabed classification. It has long been understood that details about the character of the seabed (roughness, sediment type, grain-size distribution, porosity, and material density) are embedded in the acoustical echoes from the seabed. This study developed a sophisticated yet easy-to-use technique to discriminate seabed characteristics using a split beam echosounder. Acoustic survey was conducted in Tongyeong waters, South Korea in June 2018, and the verification of acoustic seabed classification was made by the Van Veen grab sampler. The acoustic scattering signals extracted the seabed hardness and roughness components as well as various seabed features. The seabed features were selected using the principal component analysis, and the seabed classification was performed by the K-means clustering. As a result, three seabed types such as sand, mud, and shell were discriminated. This preliminary study presented feasible application of a sounder to classify the seabed substrates. It can be further developed for characterizing marine habitats on a variety of spatial scales and studying the ecological characteristic of fishes near the habitats.
Keywords
Seabed classification; Echosounder; Roughness; Hardness; Clustering;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Berthold T, Leichter A, Rosenhahn B, Berkhahn V and Valerius J. 2017. Seabed sediment classification of side-scan sonar data using convolutional neural networks. IEEE Sym Ser on Comp Int, 1-8.
2 Briggs KB, Williams KL, Jackson DR, Jones CD, Ivakin AN, and Orsi TH. 2002. Fine-scale sedimentary structure: implications for acoustic remote sensing. Mar Geol 182, 141-159. (DOI:10.1016/S0025-3227(01)00232-8)   DOI
3 Chang JK, Kim HJ, Jou HT, Suk BC, Park GT, Yoo HS and Yang SJ. 1998. Seabed classification using the K-L (Karhunen-Love) transform of chirp acoustic profiling data: an effective approach to geoacoustic modeling. J Kor Soc Oce 3(3), 158-164.
4 Collier JS and Brown CJ. 2005 Correlation of side-scan backscatter with grain size distribution of surficial seabed substrates. Mar Geol 214, 431-449. (DOI:10.1016/j.margeo.2004.11.011)   DOI
5 Echoview. 2018. Help file 9.0.18 for Echoview. Retrieved from http://support.echoview.com/WebHelp/Echoview.htm, Accessed 11 Nov 2018.
6 Fauziyah, Priatna A, Prakoso WF, Hidayat T, Surbakti H and Nurjuliasti E. 2018. Measurement and analysis of acoustic backscattering strength for characteristics of seafloor substrate in Indian Ocean WPP 572-573. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 162, 12-24. (DOI:10.1088/1755-1315/162/1/012024)
7 Freitas R, Silva S, Quintino V, Rodrigues AM, Rhynas K and Collins WT. 2003. Acoustic seabed classification of marine habitats: studies in the western coastal-shelf area of Portugal. ICES J Mar Sci 60, 599-608. (DOI: 10.1016/S1054-3139(03)00061-4)   DOI
8 Good JA, Kraft BJ, Mayer LA, Schock SG, Sommerfield CK, Olson HC, Gulick SPS and Nordfjord S. 2009. Seabed characterization on the New Jersey middle and outer shelf; correlatability and spatial variability of seafloor substrate properties. Mar Geol 209, 147-172. (DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2004.05.030)   DOI
9 Amiri-Simkooei AR, Snellen M and Simons DG. 2011. Principal component analysis of single-beam echo-sounder signal features for seafloor classification. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 36, 259-272. (DOI:10.1109/JOE.2011.2122630)   DOI
10 Anderson JT. 2007. Acoustic seabed classification of marine physical and biological landscapes. ICES Coop Res Rep 286, 1-183.
11 Lee GH, Kim HJ, Kim DC, Yi BY, Nam SM, Khim BK and Lim MS. 2009. The acoustic diversity of the seabed based on the similarity index computed from chirp seismic data. ICES J Mar Sci 66, 227-236. (DOI:10.1093/icesjms/fsn142)   DOI
12 Heald GJ and Pace NG. 1996. An analysis of the 1st and 2nd backscatter for seabed classification. Proc. 3rd Eur Conf on Und Acoust 2, 649-654.
13 Katsnelson B, Katsman R, Lunkov A and Ostrovsky I. 2015. Low-frequency sound propagation and substrate characterization in Lake Kinnerat. Proc Ins Acoust 37(1), 102-109.
14 Kim GY, Kim DC, Kim YE, Lee KH, Park SC, Park JW and Seo YK. 2002. Remote seabed classification based on characteristics of the acoustic response of echosounder: prelim result of Suyoung Bay. J Kor Fish Soc 35(3), 273-281.
15 Legendre P, Ellingsen KE, Bjornbom E and Casgrain P. 2002. Acoustic seabed classification: improved statistical method. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59, 1085-1089. (DOI: 10.1139/F02-096)   DOI
16 Lied TT, Walday M, Olsgard F, Ellingsen KE and Holm S. 2004. SEABEC - a single beam echosounder, seabed classification system. MTS/IEEE Kobe/Techno-Ocean 4, 2024-2028.   DOI
17 Simons DG, Snellen M and Ainslie MA. 2007. A multivariate correlation analysis of high frequency bottom backscattering strength measurements with geotechnical parameters. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 32(3), 640-650. (DOI: 10.1109/JOE.2007.891890)   DOI
18 MacDonald IR, Bender LC, Vardaro M, Bernard B, and Brooks JM. 2005. Thermal and visual time-series at a seafloor gas hydrate deposit on the Gulf of Mexico slope. Earth Planet Sci Lett 233, 45-59. (DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.02.002)   DOI
19 Penrose JD, Siwabessy PJW, Gavrilov A, Parnum I, Hamilton LJ, Bickers A, Brooke B, Ryan DA and Kennedy P. 2005. Acoustic techniques for seabed classification. Tech Rep 32. Coop Res Centre for Coastal Zone Est and Water Manag, 1-118.
20 Hamilton LJ. 2011. Acoustic seabed segmentation for echosounders through direct statistical clustering of seabed echoes. Cont Shelf Res 31, 2000-2011. (DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2011.10.004)   DOI
21 Simons DG and Snellen M. 2009. A Bayesian approach to seafloor classification using multibeam echosounder backscatter data. Appl Acoust 70(10), 1258-1268. (DOI:10.1016/j.apacoust.2008.07.013)   DOI
22 Siwabessy J, Penrose J, Kloser R and Fox D. 1999. Seabed habitat classification. Shallow Survey '99. Int Conf on High Res Surveys in Shallow Water, 1-81.
23 Tegowski J. 2005. Acoustical classification of bottom substrates in southern Baltic Sea. Quatern Int 130, 153-161. (DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2004.04.038)   DOI
24 Wienberg C and Bartholoma A. 2005. Acoustic seabed classification in a coastal environment (outer Weser Estuary, German Bight) - a new approach to monitor dredging and dredge spoil disposal. Cont Shelf Res 25, 1143-1156. (DOI:10.1016/j.csr.2004.12.015)   DOI
25 Rodriguez-Perez D, Sanchez-Carn N and Freire J. 2014. A pulse-length correction to improve energy-based seabed classification in coastal areas. Cont Shelf Res. 77, 1-13. (DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2014.01.012)   DOI