Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3796/KSFT.2017.53.2.126

Diel variation in vertical distribution of hairtails caught by vertical longlines  

KIM, Mun-Kwan (Ocean and Fisheries Researches Institute, Jeju Special Self-Governing Provence)
PARK, Su-Hyeon (Ocean and Fisheries Researches Institute, Jeju Special Self-Governing Provence)
KANG, Hyeong-Cheol (Ocean and Fisheries Researches Institute, Jeju Special Self-Governing Provence)
OH, Tae-Cheol (Ocean and Fisheries Researches Institute, Jeju Special Self-Governing Provence)
PARK, Yong-Seok (Ocean and Fisheries Researches Institute, Jeju Special Self-Governing Provence)
AN, Young-Il (Dept. of Maritime Police and Technology, Gangwon State University)
KIM, Suk-Jong (Faculty of Ocean Science, Jeju National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology / v.53, no.2, 2017 , pp. 126-131 More about this Journal
Abstract
To improve the efficiency of hairtail trolling, it is important to gain an accurate understanding of the distribution of fish based on their diurnal vertical migration patterns. This study evaluated the vertical distribution of hairtails through catch efficiency tests using vertical longlines. Five replicate tests of the efficiency were carried out on the eastern coast of Jeju Island from August to September 2016, from 11:00 AM to 03:00 PM in the daytime and 11:00 PM to 03:00 AM in the nighttime. The fishing gear was composed of 20 hooks per line set, numbered in order from the first hook near the surface to the last hook on the seabed. The depth of the first hook was 18 m, and that of the last hook was 86 m. Pacific saury was used as the baits. In total, 10 sets of fishing gear were used per trip. After fishing, we counted the hairtails at each numbered hook, which were summed up both by number and in aggregate. A total of 232 hairtails were caught using 2,000 hooks: 193 individuals at daytime and 39 at nighttime. The hook rate was 11.5% : 9.6% at daytime; 2.0% at nighttime. For both daytime and nighttime catches, there were variations in the hook rates at each numbered hook. In the daytime, a maximum of 28.5% catches occurred at hook number 18, followed by 21.4% at number 20, and 10.7% at number 17, accounting for 60.6% of the daytime hook rates. In the nighttime, a maximum of 23.0% catches occurred at hook number 1, followed by 15.3% at hook number 4 and 9, accounting for 53.6% of the nighttime hook rate. Based on the above results, hairtails are usually distributed in deeper region in daytime, whereas they occur near the surface in nighttime. Therefore, it is necessary to position trolling lines according to diurnal vertical distribution layers of hairtails for fishing efficiency.
Keywords
Hairtail; Diel variation; Vertical distribution; Vertical longline;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Arimoto T, Inoue Y and Ogura M. 1983. Diel Variation of Catch in Costal Set-line. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 49(8), 1175-1181.   DOI
2 Arimoto T and Iwasaki T. 1983. Vertical Distribution of Catch in Coastal Set-line.Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 49(10), 1479-1486.   DOI
3 Arimoto T. 1983. Catch Variation with Operation Time in Costal Set-line. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 49(7), 1045-1048.   DOI
4 Hwang BN and Hong BQ. 1985. On the Seasonal Distribution, Movement and Abundance of Hairtail, Trichiurus lepturus Linne, in the East China and Yellow Sea. Bull Fish Res Dev Inst Korea 36, 13-22.
5 Inoue M. 1978. Fish behaviour and Fishing method. Kouseishakouseikaku, Tokyo, 175-187.
6 Junji N. 1966. On the Swimming Layer of Engraulis japonica Shoals in Bungo Channel and its Adjacent Waters. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 32(3), 237-241. (DOI:http://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.32.237)   DOI
7 Keisuke O and Hideo O. 1971. Distribution and Movements of the Ribbon Fish in the East China Sea as Ascertained by Tagging Experiments in 1969. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 37(2), 75-82. (DOI:http://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.37.75)   DOI
8 Kenji K. 1960. Study on the improvement of the productivity of trawl fishery. Journal of the Tokyo University of Fisheries, 4(1), 1-158.
9 Kim MK, An YI, Park SH, Oh TC, Kang HC and Park YS. 2016. Behavioral reaction of hairtail (Trichinus lepturus) to different colors of LED light. J Korean Soc Fish Technol 52(3), 183-190. (DOI:10.3796/KSFT.2013.49.4.385)   DOI
10 Masahiro M. 1991. Fishery Biology of Ribbon Fish, Trichiurus lepturus in Western Wakasa Bay. Kyoto Institute of Oceanic and Fishery Science Special Report No. 3, 1-74.
11 Saito S. 1976. On the Time of Capture of Tumas by the Lone-line Gear. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 42(9), 975-985.   DOI
12 Tsuneo A. 1960. Studies on the structure of fish shoals by means of fish finder-I. Echo patches of hair-tail observed at the middle area of the East China Sea, in February 1959. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 26, 1162-1166. (DOI: http://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.26.1162)   DOI
13 Woodhead PMJ. 1966. The Behaviour of fish in relation to light in the sea. Oceonor. Mar Biol Ann Rev 4, 337-403.
14 Yamada T. 1970. The Bottom Troll-angling of Ribbon Fish in Tachibana Bay. Nagasaki university's report 30, 33-57.