Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2010.49.2.151

Control Effects against Mosquitoes Larva of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis CAB199 isolate according to Different Formulations  

Seo, Mi-Ja (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Gil, Yeong-Jong (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Kim, Tae-Hwan (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Kim, Hyung-Joong (Korea Rural Community Corporation, Rural Research Institute)
Youn, Young-Nam (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Yu, Yong-Man (Dept. Applied Biology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
Publication Information
Korean journal of applied entomology / v.49, no.2, 2010 , pp. 151-158 More about this Journal
Abstract
Among 18 Bacillus thuringiensis isolates with spherical parasporal inclusion from soils, B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis CAB199 was selected. It was showing over 90% mortality against Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens moletus. It was confirmed that this B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis CAB199 isolate also had a insecticidal activity against Culex inatomii that was occurred in the marsh. Because most of mosquito larva were primarily situated or shifted from under- to surface water, we need to select long floating formulations on surface water for controlling mosquito larva. It was tested the pesticidal and control effects in the laboratory and wetland with two formulation types of B. thuringiensis subsp. israelensis, for example, wettable power (WP) and suspension concentrate type (SC). Laboratory test showed that SC formulation type was relatively faster and more effective against 3 tested mosquito species, C. pipiens, Aedes aegypti, and C. inatomii. Otherwise, the control efficacy of SC formulation type was more rapidly appeared against C. inatomii in the wetland.
Keywords
Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis; Mosquito larva; Formulation type; Wetland;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Dominic Amalraj, D., S.S. Sahu, P. Jambulingam, P.S. Boopathi Doss, M. Kalyanasundaram and P.K. Das. 2000. Efficacy of aqueous suspension and granular formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis (Vectobac) against mosquito vectors. Acta Tropica 75: 243-246.   DOI
2 Khetan, S.K. 2001. Microbial pest control. 300bp. Marcel Dekker, Inc. N.Y.
3 Kil, M.R., D.A. Kim, S.K. Paek, J.S. Kim, S.Y. Choi, D.Y. Jin, Y.N. Youn, I.C. Hwang, M. Ohba, and Y.M. Yu. 2008. Characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. tohokuensis CAB167 isolate against mosquito larva. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 47(4): 457-465.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
4 Kim, H.S., H.W. Park, D.W. Lee, Y.M. Yu, J.I. Kim and S.K. Kang. 1995. Distribution and characterization of Bacillus thuringiensis isolates from soil in Korea. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 34(4): 344-349.
5 Laemmli, U.K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 227: 680-685.   DOI
6 Ree, H.I., K.I. Im, H.J. Shin and T.U. Kim. 1988. Study on autogeneous behaviour of Aedes togoi, the vector of Brugian filariasis in Korea. Yonsei Rep. Trop. Med., 19: 3-7.
7 Yu, H.S., D.K. Lee, W.J. Lee and J.C. Shim, 1982. Mosquito control evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis in the laboratory, simulated rice paddies, and confined field trials in marsh and sewage effluent in South Korea. J. Entomol. 12: 69-82.
8 Benintende, G.B., J.E. Lopez-Meza, J.G. Cozzi, C.F. Piccinetti and J.E. Ibarra. 2000. Characterization of INTA 51-3, a new atypical strain of Bacillus thuringiensis from Argentina. Curr. Microbiol. 41; 396-401.   DOI
9 Arredondo-jimenez, J.I. and K.M. Valdez-Delgado. 2006. Effect of Novalurion (Rimon$^{\circledR}$ 10EC) on the mosquitoes Anopheles albimanus, Anopheles pseudopunctipennis, Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus and Culex quinquefasciatus from Chiapas, Mexico. Med. Vecter. Entomol. 20: 377-387.   DOI
10 Beckage, N.E., K.M. Marion, W.E. Walton, M.C. Wirth and F.F. Tan. 2004. The comparative larvicidal toxicities of three ecdysone agonists on the mosquitoes, Aedes aegypti, Culex quinquefasciatus and Anopheles gambiae. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 57: 111-122.   DOI
11 Choi, S.Y., S.C. Oh, M.S. Cho, S.K. Paek, J.S. Kim, D.A. Kim, M.R. Gill, Y.N. Youn and Y.M. Yu. 2007. Bioassay of environment-friendly insecticides for management of mosquito, Cules pipiens molestus. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 46(2): 261-267.   DOI
12 Das, P.K. and D. Dominic Amalraj. 1997. Biological control of malaria vetors. Indian J. Med. Res. 106: 174-197.