Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5656/KSAE.2007.46.1.153

Development of Observation Methods for Density of Stink Bugs in Soybean Field  

Bae, Soon-Do (Yeongnam Agricul. Res. Inst., NICS, RDA)
Kim, Hyun-Ju (Yeongnam Agricul. Res. Inst., NICS, RDA)
Lee, Geon-Hwi (Yeongnam Agricul. Res. Inst., NICS, RDA)
Park, Sung-Tae (Yeongnam Agricul. Res. Inst., NICS, RDA)
Publication Information
Korean journal of applied entomology / v.46, no.1, 2007 , pp. 153-158 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to develope the observing methods for density of stink bugs in soybean reproductive stage. The adults and nymphs of bean bug, Riptortus clavatus, red-banded shield bug, Piezodous hybneri, green stink bug, Nezara antennata, Sole bug, Dolycoris baccarum, and brown marmorated stink bug, Halyomorpha halys were observed by three observing methods such as beating, sweeping net, and visual counting methods in the full bloom (R2), full pod (R4) and beginning maturity (R7) of soybean. As a result, total number of stink bugs observed was the highest with 5,214.2 by beating method, and then was 2,581.8 by visual counting method, and was the lowest with 103.1 by sweeping net method. Total number of stink bugs observed by the beating and visual counting methods was P. hybneri, followed by N. antennata, H. halys, R. clavatus and D. baccarum with clear difference in observed number of each stink bugs while total number of stink bugs observed by sweeping net method was very low in the range of 18 to 23. Accordingly, the observed density of stink bugs exception of R. clavatus adult by beating method was generally high. However, the number of R. clavatus adult was more observed by flushing method than that by beating method from the beginning bloom (R1) to full maturity (R8), and was more observed at morning time than that at afternoon time. Therefore, two observation methods that flushing method for R. clavatus and beating method for the other stink bugs were recommended for the occurring density of stink bugs in soybean because both bean bug and pentatomidae stink bugs have distinct behavior characteristics such as flying and dropping.
Keywords
Soybean field; Stink bugs; Observation method; Observed quantity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Leal, W.S., H. Higuchi, N. Mizutani, H. Nakamori, T. kadosawa and M. Ono. 1995. Multifunctional communication in Riptortus clavatus (Heteroptera: Alydidae): conspecific egg parasitoid nymphs Ooencyrtus nezarae use the same adult attractant pheromone as chemical cue. J. Chem. Ecol. 21: 973-985   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Huh, H.S., K.H. Park, W.D. Seo and C.G. Park. 2005. Interaction of aggregation pheromone components of the bean bug, Riptortus clavatus (Thunberg) (Heteroptera: Alydidae). Appl. Entomol. zool. 40: 643-648   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Witzgall, P. 2001. Pheromone-future techniques for insect control? Pheromone for Insect Cont. Orchard and Vineyards. lOBC wprs Bull. 24: 114-122
4 Zink, A.G. and J.A. Rosenheim. 2004. State-dependent sampling bias in insects: implications for monitoring western tarnished plant bugs. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 113: 117-123   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Fleischer, S.J. and W.A. Allen. 1982. Field counting efficiency of sweep-net samples of adult potato leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in alfalfa. J. Econo. Entornol. 75: 837-840   DOI
6 Fleischer, S.J., M.J. Gaylor and J.V. Edelson. 1985. Estimating absolute density from relative sampling of Lygus lineolaris (Heteroptera: Miridae) from selected predators in early to midseason cotton. Environ. Entomol. 14: 709-717   DOI
7 Race, S.R. 1960. A comparison of two sampling techniques for Lygus bugs and stink bugs on cotton. J. Econo. Entomol. 53: 689-690   DOI
8 RDA. 1999. Criteria of the monitoring of agricultural insect pests. Rur. Devel. Admin. 295pp
9 Thorbek, P., C.J. Topping and K.D. Sunderland. 2002. Validation of a sample method for monitoring aerial activity of spiders. Arachnol. 30: 57-64   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Wada, T. and M. Kobayashi. 1985. Distribution pattern and sampling techniques of the rice leaf roller, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, in a paddy field. Jpn. J. Appl. Ent. Zool. 29: 230-235   DOI
11 Yasunaga, T., M. Takai, l. Yamashida, M. Kawamura and T. Kawasawa. 1995. A field guide to Japanese bugs. Ass. Nat. Rur. Edu. 380pp
12 Ha, KS., N.K. Heo, J.R. Kim, S.Y. Kim and S.H. Song. 1998. Effect of different seeding times and soybean varieties on damage and occurrence of hemiptera insect. RDA. J. Crop Protec. 40: 32-36
13 Kang, C.H., H.S. Huh and C.G. Park. 2003. Review on true bugs infesting tree fruits, upland crops, and weeds in Korea. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 42: 269-277   과학기술학회마을
14 Pedigo, L.P., G.D. Butin and E.J. Bechinski. 1982. Flushing technique and sequential-count plan for green cloverworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) moths in soybeans. Environ. Entomol. 11: 1223- J228   DOI
15 Chung, B.K., S.W. Kang and J.H. Kwon. 1995. Damage, occurrences and control of hemipterous insects in non-astringent persimmon orchards. RDA. J. Agri. Sci. 37: 376-382
16 Bae, S.D., H.J. Kim, C.G. Park, J.K. Jung and H.J. Cho. 2004. Effects of food combinations of leguminous seeds on nymphal development, adult longevity and oviposition of bean bug, Riptortus clavatus Thunberg. Kor. J. Appl. Entomol. 43: 123-127   과학기술학회마을
17 Higuchi, H. 2001. Occurrence and control of stink bugs attacking soybeans. Pl. Quarant. 55: 220-223
18 Sevacherian, V. and V.M. Stern. 1972. Spatial distribution patterns of Lygus bugs in California cotton fields. Environ. Entomol. 1:695-704   DOI
19 Hollingsworth, R.G., A.H. Hara and K.T. Sewake. 2001. Scouting for thrips in orchid flowers. Insect Pests. IP-8: 1-4
20 Wada, T. and H. Shimajin. 1978. Seasonal occurrence of rice leaf roller, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, in Chikugo. Research Report of Insect Pests of Kyushu Agr. Expt. Sta. 24: 77-79
21 Larson, D.P., K.M. O'Neill and W.P. Kemp. 1999. Evaluation of the accuracy of sweep sampling in determining grasshopper (Orthoptera: Acrididae) community composition. J. Agric. Urban Entomol. 16: 207-214
22 Byerly, K.F., A.P. Gutierrez, R.E. Jones and R.F. Luck. 1978. A comparison of sampling methods for some arthropod populations in cotton. Higardia 46: 257-282
23 Ellington, J., J.K. Kiser, G. Ferguson and M. Cardenas. 1984. A comparison of sweepnet, absolute, and insectavac sampling methods in cotton ecosystems. J. Econo. Entomol. 77: 599-605   DOI