Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2020.00745

Personal experience with microvascular decompression and partial sensory rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia  

Lee, Jung Hwan (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Hospital)
Lee, Jae Meen (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Hospital)
Choi, Chang Hwa (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science / v.38, no.3, 2021 , pp. 202-207 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe, paroxysmal pain in the distribution of the fifth cranial nerve. Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the most widely used surgical treatment for TN. We undertook this study to analyze the effects of and complications of MVD and to refine the surgical procedure for treating TN. Methods: A total of 88 patients underwent for TN underwent surgery at our hospital. Among them, 77 patients underwent MVD alone, and 11 underwent partial sensory rhizotomy (PSR) with or without MVD. The medical records of these patients were retrospectively analyzed for patient characteristics, clinical results, offending vessels, and complications if any. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 43.2 months (range, 3-216 months). The most common site of pain was V2+V3 territory (n=27), followed by V2 (n=25) and V3 (n=23). The most common offending vessels were the superior cerebellar artery and anterior inferior cerebellar artery in that order. The overall rate of postoperative complications was 46.1%; however, most complications were transient. There were two cases of permanent partial hearing disturbance. In the MVD alone group, the cure rate was 67.5%, and the improvement rate was 26.0%. Among 11 patients who underwent PSR with or without MVD, the cure rate was 50.0%, and the improvement rate was 30.0%. Conclusion: The clinical results of MVD were satisfactory. Although the outcomes of PSR were not as favorable as those of pure MVD in this study, PSR can be considered in cases where there is no significant vascular compressive lesion or uncertainty of the causative vessel at the surgery.
Keywords
Microvascular decompression surgery; Rhizotomy; Treatment outcome; Trigeminal neuralgia;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bederson JB, Wilson CB. Evaluation of microvascular decompression and partial sensory rhizotomy in 252 cases of trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 1989;71:359-67.   DOI
2 Frazier CH. Trigeminal neuralgia: fourteen years experience with fractional section of the sensory root as the major operation. JAMA 1927;89:1742-4.   DOI
3 Kim SH, Choi CH. The efficacy of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2005;37: 357-63.
4 Rogers CL, Shetter AG, Fiedler JA, Smith KA, Han PP, Speiser BL. Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: the initial experience of The Barrow Neurological Institute. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;47:1013-9.   DOI
5 Dandy WE. Concerning the cause of trigeminal neuralgia. AM J Surg 1934;24:447-55.   DOI
6 Kang IH, Park BJ, Park CK, Malla HP, Lee SH, Rhee BA. A clinical analysis of secondary surgery in trigeminal neuralgia patients who failed prior treatment. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2016;59:637-42.   DOI
7 Zhang L, Zhang Y, Li C, Zhu S. Surgical treatment of primary trigeminal neuralgia: comparison of the effectiveness between MVD and MVD+PSR in a series of 210 patients. Turk Neurosurg 2012;22:32-8.
8 Klun B. Microvascular decompression and partial sensory rhizotomy in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: personal experience with 220 patients. Neurosurgery 1992;30:49-52.   DOI
9 Abhinav K, Love S, Kalantzis G, Coakham HB, Patel NK. Clinicopathological review of patients with and without multiple sclerosis treated by partial sensory rhizotomy for medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia: a 12-year retrospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2012;114:361-5.   DOI
10 Gao J, Fu Y, Guo SK, Li B, Xu ZX. Efficacy and prognostic value of partial sensory rhizotomy and microvascular decompression for primary trigeminal neuralgia: a comparative study. Med Sci Monit 2017;23:2284-91.   DOI
11 Koopman JS, de Vries LM, Dieleman JP, Huygen FJ, Stricker BH, Sturkenboom MC. A nationwide study of three invasive treatments for trigeminal neuralgia. Pain 2011;152:507-13.   DOI
12 Liang X, Dong X, Zhao S, Ying X, Du Y, Yu W. A retrospective study of neurocombing for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia without neurovascular compression. Ir J Med Sci 2017;186: 1033-9.   DOI
13 Ko AL, Ozpinar A, Lee A, Raslan AM, McCartney S, Burchiel KJ. Long-term efficacy and safety of internal neurolysis for trigeminal neuralgia without neurovascular compression. J Neurosurg 2015;122:1048-57.   DOI
14 Zhong J, Zhu J, Sun H, Dou NN, Wang YN, Ying TT, et al. Microvascular decompression surgery: surgical principles and technical nuances based on 4000 cases. Neurol Res 2014; 36:882-93.   DOI
15 Zhao H, Zhang X, Tang D, Li S. Nerve combing for trigeminal neuralgia without vascular compression. J Craniofac Surg 2017;28:e15-6.   DOI
16 Toda K. Operative treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: review of current techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:788-805. e1-6.   DOI
17 Bond AE, Zada G, Gonzalez AA, Hansen C, Giannotta SL. Operative strategies for minimizing hearing loss and other major complications associated with microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. World Neurosurg 2010;74:172-7.   DOI
18 Gunther T, Gerganov VM, Stieglitz L, Ludemann W, Samii A, Samii M. Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia in the elderly: long-term treatment outcome and comparison with younger patients. Neurosurgery 2009;65:477-82.   DOI
19 Xia L, Zhong J, Zhu J, Wang YN, Dou NN, Liu MX, et al. Effectiveness and safety of microvascular decompression surgery for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25:1413-7.   DOI
20 Ferroli P, Acerbi F, Tomei M, Tringali G, Franzini A, Broggi G. Advanced age as a contraindication to microvascular decompression for drug-resistant trigeminal neuralgia: evidence of prejudice? Neurol Sci 2010;31:23-8.
21 Oesman C, Mooij JJ. Long-term follow-up of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Skull Base 2011;21:313-22.   DOI
22 Phan K, Rao PJ, Dexter M. Microvascular decompression for elderly patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Clin Neurosci 2016;29:7-14.   DOI
23 Theodros D, Rory Goodwin C, Bender MT, Zhou X, Garzon-Muvdi T, De la Garza-Ramos R, et al. Efficacy of primary microvascular decompression versus subsequent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 2017;126: 1691-7.   DOI
24 Mendoza N, Illingworth RD. Trigeminal neuralgia treated by microvascular decompression: a long-term follow-up study. Br J Neurosurg 1995;9:13-9.   DOI
25 Lee A, McCartney S, Burbidge C, Raslan AM, Burchiel KJ. Trigeminal neuralgia occurs and recurs in the absence of neurovascular compression. J Neurosurg 2014;120:1048-54.   DOI
26 Ishikawa M, Nishi S, Aoki T, Takase T, Wada E, Ohwaki H, et al. Operative findings in cases of trigeminal neuralgia without vascular compression: proposal of a different mechanism. J Clin Neurosci 2002;9:200-4.   DOI