Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12701/yujm.2019.00192

Feasibility and efficacy of coil embolization for middle cerebral artery aneurysms  

Choi, Jae Young (Department of Neurosurgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital)
Choi, Chang Hwa (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Hospital)
Ko, Jun Kyeung (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Hospital)
Lee, Jae Il (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Hospital)
Huh, Chae Wook (Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Hospital)
Lee, Tae Hong (Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Pusan National University Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science / v.36, no.3, 2019 , pp. 208-218 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: The anatomy of middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms has been noted to be unfavorable for endovascular treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of coiling for MCA aneurysms. Methods: From January 2004 to December 2015, 72 MCA aneurysms (38 unruptured and 34 ruptured) in 67 patients were treated with coils. Treatment-related complications, clinical outcomes, and immediate and follow-up angiographic outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Aneurysms were located at the MCA bifurcation (n=60), 1st segment (M1, n=8), and 2nd segment (M2, n=4). Sixty-nine aneurysms (95.8%) were treated by neck remodeling techniques using multi-catheter (n=44), balloon (n=14), stent (n=8), or combination of these (n=3). Only 3 aneurysms were treated by single-catheter technique. Angiographic results were 66 (91.7%) complete, 5 (6.9%) remnant neck, and 1 (1.4%) incomplete occlusion. Procedural complications included aneurysm rupture (n=1), asymptomatic coil migration to the distal vessel (n=1), and acute thromboembolism (n=10) consisting of 8 asymptomatic and 2 symptomatic events. Treatment-related permanent morbidity and mortality rates were 4.5% and 3.0%, respectively. There was no bleeding on clinical follow-up (mean, 29 months; range, 6-108 months). Follow-up angiographic results (mean, 26 months; range, 6-96 months) in patients included 1 major and 3 minor recanalizations. Conclusion: Coiling of MCA aneurysms could be a technically feasible and clinically effective treatment strategy with acceptable angiographic and clinical outcomes. However, the safety and efficacy of this technique as compared to surgical clipping remains to be ascertained.
Keywords
Coil embolization; Intracranial aneurysm; Middle cerebral artery;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002;360:1267-74.   DOI
2 Regli L, Uske A, de Tribolet N. Endovascular coil placement compared with surgical clipping for the treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a consecutive series. J Neurosurg 1999;90:1025-30.   DOI
3 Regli L, Dehdashti AR, Uske A, de Tribolet N. Endovascular coiling compared with surgical clipping for the treatment of unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms: an update. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2002;82:41-6.
4 Raftopoulos C, Mathurin P, Boscherini D, Billa RF, van Boven M, Hantson P. Prospective analysis of aneurysm treatment in a series of 103 consecutive patients when endovascular embolization is considered the first option. J Neurosurg 2000;93:175-82.   DOI
5 Iijima A, Piotin M, Mounayer C, Spelle L, Weill A, Moret J. Endovascular treatment with coils of 149 middle cerebral artery berry aneurysms. Radiology 2005;237:611-9.   DOI
6 Doerfler A, Wanke I, Goericke SL, Wiedemayer H, Engelhorn T, Gizewski ER, et al. Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with electrolytically detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:513-20.
7 Kim BM, Park SI, Kim DJ, Kim DI, Suh SH, Kwon TH, et al. Endovascular coil embolization of aneurysms with a branch incorporated into the sac. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:145-51.   DOI
8 Quadros RS, Gallas S, Noudel R, Rousseaux P, Pierot L. Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms as first option: a single center experience of 92 aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1567-72.   DOI
9 Horowitz M, Gupta R, Gologorsky Y, Jovin T, Genevro J, Levy E, et al. Clinical and anatomic outcomes after endovascular coiling of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: report on 30 treated aneurysms and review of the literature. Surg Neurol 2006;66:167-71.   DOI
10 Kim J, Chang C, Jung Y. Feasibility and midterm outcomes of endovascular coil embolization of an unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm with an incorporated branch. World Neurosurg 2018;118:e745-52.   DOI
11 Lubicz B, Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, Lejeune JP, Pruvo JP. HyperForm remodeling-balloon for endovascular treatment of wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:1381-3.
12 Lubicz B, Lefranc F, Levivier M, Dewitte O, Pirotte B, Brotchi J, et al. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with a branch arising from the sac. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:142-7.
13 Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke 2001;32:1998-2004.   DOI
14 Ausman JI. The future of neurovascular surgery. Part I: intracranial aneurysms. Surg Neurol 1997;48:98-100.   DOI
15 Suzuki S, Tateshima S, Jahan R, Duckwiler GR, Murayama Y, Gonzalez NR, et al. Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms with detachable coils: angiographic and clinical outcomes in 115 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 2009;64:876-88.   DOI
16 van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M. Procedural morbidity and mortality of elective coil treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1678-80.
17 Bracard S, Abdel-Kerim A, Thuillier L, Klein O, Anxionnat R, Finitsis S, et al. Endovascular coil occlusion of 152 middle cerebral artery aneurysms: initial and midterm angiographic and clinical results. J Neurosurg 2010;112:703-8.   DOI
18 Jayaraman MV, Do HM, Versnick EJ, Steinberg GK, Marks MP. Morphologic assessment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms for endovascular treatment. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;16:52-6.   DOI
19 Higashida RT, Lahue BJ, Torbey MT, Hopkins LN, Leip E, Hanley DF. Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a nationwide assessment of effectiveness. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:146-51.
20 Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809-17.   DOI
21 Choi JH, Park JE, Kim MJ, Kim BS, Shin YS. Aneurysmal neck clipping as the primary treatment option for both ruptured and unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2016;59:269-75.   DOI
22 Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, Rabinstein A, Kallmes DF. Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: a systematic review and single-center series. Neurosurgery 2011;68:397-402.   DOI
23 Kim SR, Vora N, Jovin TG, Gupta R, Thomas A, Kassam A, et al. Anatomic results and complications of stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 2008;14:267-84.   DOI
24 Nishido H, Piotin M, Bartolini B, Pistocchi S, Redjem H, Blanc R. Analysis of complications and recurrences of aneurysm coiling with special emphasis on the stent-assisted technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:339-44.   DOI