Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2022.14.1.029

Comparing English and Korean speakers' word-final /rl/ clusters using dynamic time warping  

Cho, Hyesun (Department of Education, Graduate School of Education, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Phonetics and Speech Sciences / v.14, no.1, 2022 , pp. 29-36 More about this Journal
Abstract
The English word-final /rl/ cluster poses a particular problem for Korean learners of English because it is the sequence of two sounds, /r/ and /l/, which are not contrastive in Korean. This study compared the similarity distances between English and Korean speakers' /rl/ productions using the dynamic time warping (DTW) algorithm. The words with /rl/ (pearl, world) and without /rl/ (bird, word) were recorded by four English speakers and four Korean speakers, and compared pairwise. The F2-F1 trajectories, the acoustic correlate of velarized /l/, and F3 trajectories, the acoustic correlate of /r/, were examined. Formant analysis showed that English speakers lowered F2-F1 values toward the end of a word, unlike Korean speakers, suggesting the absence of /l/ in Korean speakers. In contrast, there was no significant difference in F3 values. Mixed-effects regression analyses of the DTW distances revealed that Korean speakers produced /r/ similarly to English speakers but failed to produce the velarized /l/ in /rl/ clusters.
Keywords
English rhotic; English lateral; dynamic time warping; formant; velarized l; dark l;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sohn, H. S., & Lim, S. (2020). Phonetic implementation of the darkness of English word-final /l/ across prosodic positions: Comparison of native English speakers and EFL Korean speakers. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 20, 450-474.   DOI
2 Zhou, X., Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Boyce, S., Tiede, M., Holland, C., & Choe, A. (2008). A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of "retroflex" and "bunched" American English /r/. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(6), 4466-4481.   DOI
3 Kim, R. E., & Rhee, S. C. (2019). A study on English liquids in the rated L2 English speech corpus of Korean learners. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 19(1), 53-75.   DOI
4 Allen, G. D. (1979, December). Transcription of the American /r/. Current issues in the phonetic sciences: Proceedings of the IPS-77 Congress (pp. 1019-1025). Miami Beach, FL.
5 Cho, S., Nevler, N., Parjane, N., Cieri, C., Liberman, M., Grossman, M., & Cousins, K. A. Q. (2021). Automated analysis of digitized letter fluency data. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 654214.   DOI
6 Boujnah, S., Sun, X., Marshall, D., Rosin, P. L., & Ammari, M. L. (2021). A novel approach for speaker recognition in degraded conditions. In N. Derbel, & O. Kanoun (Eds.), Advanced methods for human biometrics(pp. 139-146). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
7 Borden, G., Gerber, A., & Milsark, G. (1983). Production and perception of the /r/-/l/ contrast in Korean adults learning English. Language Learning, 33(4), 499-526.   DOI
8 Kang, H. S. (1999). Production and perception of English /r/ and /l/ by Korean learners of English: An experimental study. Speech Sciences, 6, 7-24.
9 Flege, J. E. (1987). The production of "new" and "similar" phones in a foreign language: Evidence for the effect of equivalence classification. Journal of Phonetics, 15(1), 47-65.   DOI
10 Espy-Wilson, C. Y. (1992). Acoustic measures for linguistic features distinguishing the semivowels /w j r l/ in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92(2), 736-757.   DOI
11 Jang, T. (2005). Construction of an English speech database for Korean learners of English. Language and Linguistics, 35, 293-310.
12 Idemaru, K., & Holt, L. L. (2013). The developmental trajectory of children's perception and production of English /r/-/l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(6), 4232-4246.   DOI
13 Ingram, J. C. L., & Park, S. G. (1998). Language, context, and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(2), 1161-1174.   DOI
14 Jadoul, Y., Thompson, B., & de Boer, B. (2018). Introducing Parselmouth: A Python interface to Praat. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 1-15.   DOI
15 Sproat, R., & Fujimura, O. (1993). Allophonic variation in English /l/ and its implications for phonetic implementation. Journal of Phonetics, 21(3), 291-311.   DOI
16 Stevens, K. (1998). Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17 Guenther, F. H., Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Boyce, S. E., Matthies, M. L., Zandipour, M., & Perkell, J. S. (1999). Articulatory tradeoffs reduce acoustic variability during American English /r/ production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(5), 2854-2865.   DOI
18 Kasuya, H., Tan, X., & Yang, C. S. (1994, September). Voice source and vocal tract characteristics associated with speaker individuality. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 94) (pp. 1459-1462). Yokohama, Japan.
19 Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
20 Kwon, J. S. (2010). An experimental study on the English sonorant cluster /rl/ produced by native speakers and young Korean EFL learners (Master's thesis). Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea.
21 Park, S. (2004). An analysis of the causes of English mispronunciation by Korean learners and solution for their improvement. Journal of the Linguistic Society of Korea, 40, 113-143.
22 Park, S., & Jang, T. Y. (2016). Acoustic characteristics of English liquids produced by Korean learners of English. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 22(2), 289-315.   DOI
23 Regier, K. T. (2014). Formant trajectory analysis using dynamic time warping: Preliminary results. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(4), 2082.   DOI
24 Sakoe, H., & Chiba, S. (1978). Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 26(1), 43-49.   DOI
25 Giorgino, T. (2009). Computing and visualizing dynamic time warping alignments in R: The dtw package. Journal of Statistical Software, 31(7), 1-24.   DOI
26 Chung, H., & Pollock, K. E. (2014). Acoustic characteristics of adults' rhotic monophthongs and diphthongs. Communication Sciences & Disorders, 19(1), 113-119.   DOI
27 Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2020). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.1.35) [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
28 Carr, P. (2020). English phonetics and phonology: An introduction(3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
29 Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M. (2010). English pronunciation: A course book and reference guide (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30 Delattre, P., & Freeman, D. C. (1968). A dialect study of American R's by X-ray motion picture. Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences, 6(44), 29-68.
31 Hwang, Y. (2021). Articulatory characteristics of word-final English /ɹ/ produced by Korean learners of American English. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 27(2), 353-371.   DOI
32 Feinberg, D. R. (2022). Parselmouth Praat scripts in Python. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6DWR3   DOI
33 Feng, Z. (2020). Effects of identification and pronunciation training methods on L2 speech perception and production: Training adult Japanese speakers to perceive and produce English /r/-/l/. Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 20(2), 57-83.
34 Gimson, A. C. (1989). An introduction to the pronunciation of English(4th ed.). London, UK: Edward Arnold.
35 Iverson, G. K., & Sohn, H. S. (1994). Liquid representation in Korean. In Y. K. Kim-Renaud (Ed.), Theoretical issues in Korean linguistics(pp. 79-100). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Centre for the Study of Language and Information.
36 Johnson, K. (2003). Acoustic and auditory phonetics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
37 Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K. (2011). A course in phonetics(6th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
38 R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/