Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2020.12.3.033

Comparison of vowel lengths of articles and monosyllabic nouns in Korean EFL learners' noun phrase production in relation to their English proficiency  

Park, Woojim (Department of English Language and Literature, Yonsei University)
Mo, Ranm (Department of English Language and Literature, Yonsei University)
Rhee, Seok-Chae (Department of English Language and Literature, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Phonetics and Speech Sciences / v.12, no.3, 2020 , pp. 33-40 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to find out the relation between Korean learners' English proficiency and the ratio of the length of the stressed vowel in a monosyllabic noun to that of the unstressed vowel in an article of the noun phrases (e.g., "a cup", "the bus", etcs.). Generally, the vowels in monosyllabic content words are phonetically more prominent than the ones in monosyllabic function words as the former have phrasal stress, making the vowels in content words longer in length, higher in pitch, and louder in amplitude. This study, based on the speech samples from Korean-Spoken English Corpus (K-SEC) and Rated Korean-Spoken English Corpus (Rated K-SEC), examined 879 English noun phrases, which are composed of an article and a monosyllabic noun, from sentences which are rated on 4 levels of proficiency. The lengths of the vowels in these 879 target NPs were measured and the ratio of the vowel lengths in nouns to those in articles was calculated. It turned out that the higher the proficiency level, the greater the mean ratio of the vowels in nouns to the vowels in articles, confirming the research's hypothesis. This research thus concluded that for the Korean English learners, the higher the English proficiency level, the better they could produce the stressed and unstressed vowels with more conspicuous length differences between them.
Keywords
content words; function words; article; noun; noun phrase; vowel length; fluency; stress; Korean English learner;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
2 Avery, P., & Ehrlich, S. (1992). Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers Series. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3 Carroll, J. (1964). Words, meanings and concepts. Harvard Educational Review, 34(2), 178-202.   DOI
4 Dalton, C., & Seidlhofer, B. (1994). Pronunciation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5 Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393-410.   DOI
6 Gimson, A. C., & Ramsaran, S. (1989). An introduction to the pronunciation of English (4th ed.). London, UK: Hodder Arnold.
7 James, A. L. (1940). Speech signals in telephony. London, UK: Sir I. Pitman & Sons.
8 Klatt, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59(5), 1208-1221.   DOI
9 Ladefoged, P. (1975). A course in phonetics. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
10 Lee, B., Guion, S. G., & Harada, T. (2006). Acoustic analysis of production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean, and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(3), 487-513.   DOI
11 Morley, J. (1991). The pronunciation component in teaching English to speakers of other languages. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 481-520.   DOI
12 McAllister, R., Flege, J. E., & Piske, T. (2002). The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30(2), 229-258.   DOI
13 McNerney, M., & Mendelsohn, D. (1992). Suprasegmentals in the pronunciation class: Setting priorities. In P. Avery & S. Ehrlich (eds.) Teaching American English pronunciation (pp. 185-196). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14 Morley, J. (1987). Current perspectives on pronunciation: Practices anchored in theory. Washington, DC: TESOL.
15 Park, H. S. (2018). Suprasegmentals affecting fluency levels in elementary students' read-speech: focusing on pause numbers and duration, speech rate, and pitch range (Master's thesis). Yonsei University, Korea.
16 Pike, K. L. (1945). The intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
17 Rhee, S. C. (2017). Enhancement of reliability of the ranking in the rated speech corpus of Korean L2 learners of English and a study of the relationships between sound features and assessment rankings (Research report). Daejeon, Korea: Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute.
18 Umeda, N. (1975). Vowel duration in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 58(2), 434-445.   DOI
19 Yoo, H. (2014). Phonetic reduction of English function words in the passage reading by Korean EFL learners. English Language and Linguistics, 20(1), 179-202.