Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2019.11.4.081

The realization of English rhythm by Busan Korean speakers  

Choe, Wook Kyung (College of General Education, Dong-A University)
Publication Information
Phonetics and Speech Sciences / v.11, no.4, 2019 , pp. 81-87 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of the current study is to investigate the realization of speech rhythm in English as spoken by Korean learners of English. The study particularly aims to examine the rhythm metrics of English read speech by learners who speak Busan or the South Kyungsang dialect of Korean. Twenty-four learners whose L1 is Busan Korean and eight native speakers of English read a passage wherein five sentences were segmented and labeled as vocalic and intervocalic intervals. Various rhythm metrics such as %V, Varcos, and Pairwise Variability Indexes (PVIs) were calculated. The results show that Korean learners read English sentences with significantly more vocalic and consonantal intervals at a slower speech rate than native English speakers. The analyses of rhythm metrics revealed that when the speech rate was not normalized, Korean learners' English showed more variability in the length of consonantal and vocalic intervals. However, speech-rate-normalized rhythm metrics for vocalic intervals indicated that Korean learners transferred their L1 rhythmic structures (a syllable-timed language) into their L2 speech (a stress-timed language). Overall, the results suggest that Korean learners' English reflects the rhythmic characteristics of their L1. The effect of the learners' L1 dialect on the realization of L2 speech rhythm is also speculated.
Keywords
English rhythm; second language acquisition; rhythm metrics; Korean learners of English; Busan Korean;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, J. M., Flynn, S., & Oh, M. (2007). Non-native speech rhythm: A large-scale study of English pronunciation by Korean learners. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 13(2), 219-250.
2 Kim, S. A. (2008). Rethinking the dichotomy between syllable-timed vs. stress-timed languages with particular reference to Korean L1 speakers’ English. The Journal of Studies in Language, 24(3), 473-493.   DOI
3 Krivokapic, J. (2007). Prosodic planning: Effects of phrasal length and complexity on pause duration. Journal of Phonetics, 35(2), 162-179.   DOI
4 Lee, D. M. (2009). The loanword tonology of South Kyungsang Korean (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
5 Lee, H. B., Jin, N. T., Seong, C. J., Jung, I. J., & Lee, S. M. (1994). An experimental phonetic study of speech rhythm in Standard Korean. In 3rd International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (pp. 1091-1094). Yokohama, Japan.
6 Lee, H. Y., & Song, J. (2019). Evaluating Korean learners’ English rhythm proficiency with measures of sentence stress. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(6), 1363-1376.   DOI
7 Lin, H., & Wang, Q. (2007). Mandarin rhythm: An acoustic study. Journal of Chinese Language and Computing, 17(3), 127-140.
8 Lee, O. H., & Kim, J. M. (2005). Syllable-timing interferes with Korean learners’ speech of stress-timed English. Speech Sciences, 12(4), 95-112.
9 Ling, L. E., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F. (2000). Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech, 43, 377-401.   DOI
10 Pike, K. L. (1945). The Intonation of American English. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
11 Ramus, R., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73(3), 265-292.   DOI
12 Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.66) [Computer Program]. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/
13 Yoshida, K., Yoon, J., & Kim, H. J. (2007). Production and perception of word prosody in three dialects of Korean. Proceedings of 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 1,169-1,172). Saarbrucken, Germany.
14 Sa, J. J. (2015). Rhythm metrics approach on English speech by Korean learners of English. Journal of British and America Studies, 35, 235-254.
15 Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
16 Arvaniti, A. (2009). Rhythm, timing and the timing of rhythm. Phonetica, 66, 46-63.   DOI
17 Arvaniti, A. (2012). The usefulness of metrics in the quantification of speech rhythm. Journal of Phonetics, 40(3), 351-373.   DOI
18 Choe, W. K. (2016). Acquisition of prosodic phrasing and edge tones by Korean learners of English. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 8(4), 31-38.   DOI
19 Chang, S. E. (2013). Effects of fundamental frequency and duration variation on the perception of South Kyungsang Korean tones. Language and Speech, 56(2), 211-228.   DOI
20 Cho, M. H. (2004). Rhythm typology of Korean speech. Cognitive Process, 5(4), 249-253.   DOI
21 Dellwo, V. (2006). Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for delta C. In P. Karnowski, & I. Szigeti (Eds.), Language and language processing: Proceedings of the 38th Linguistic Colloquium (pp. 231-241). Frankfurt, Germany.
22 Jang, T. Y. (2009a). Automatic assessment of non-native prosody using rhythm metrics: Focusing on Korean speakers' English pronunciation. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on East Asian Linguistics.
23 Dellwo, V. (2008). The role of speech rate in perceiving speech rhythm. In Speech Prosody 2008, Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008 series (pp. 375-378). Campinas, Brazil.
24 Grabe, E., & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Gussenhoven, C., & Warner, N. (Eds.), Laboratory phonology 7, (pp. 515-546). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
25 Jang, T. Y. (2008). Speech rhythm metrics for automatic scoring of English speech by Korean EFL learners. Malsori, 66, 41-59.
26 Jang, T. Y. (2009b). Rhythm metrics of spoken Korean. Language and Linguistics, 46, 169-185.
27 Kim, H. K., & Chung, H. (2016). An analysis of the rhythm and reduced vowels of Korean adult learners of English. Studies in Foreign Language Education, 30(3), 109-132.   DOI