Changes in fundamental frequency depending on language, context, and language proficiency for bilinguals |
Yoon, Somang
(Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University)
Mok, Sora (Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University) Youn, Jungseon (Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University) Han, Jiyun (Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University) Yim, Dongsun (Department of Communication Disorders, Ewha Womans University) |
1 | Zraick, R. I., Skaggs, S. D., & Montague, J. C. (2000). The effect of task on determination of habitual pitch. Journal of Voice, 14(4), 484-489. DOI |
2 | Barrett, K. C., Zahn-Waxler, C., & Cole, P. M. (1993). Avoiders vs. amenders: Implications for the investigation of guilt and shame during toddlerhood? Cognition & Emotion, 7(6), 481-505. DOI |
3 | Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. J. M. (2001). Praat: A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341-347. |
4 | Briley, D. A., Morris, M. W., & Simonson, I. (2005). Cultural chameleons: Biculturals, conformity motives, and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 351-362. DOI |
5 | Busa, M. G., & Urbani, M. (2011, August). A cross linguistic analysis of pitch range in English L1 and L2. Proceedings of 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII) (pp. 380-383). Hong Kong. |
6 | Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676-713. DOI |
7 | Chen, S. H. (2005). The effects of tones on speaking frequency and intensity ranges in Mandarin and Min dialects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(5), 3225-3230. DOI |
8 | Danziger, S., & Ward, R. (2010). Language changes implicit associations between ethnic groups and evaluation in bilinguals. Psychological Science, 21(6), 799-800. DOI |
9 | Deutsch, D., Le, J., Shen, J., & Henthorn, T. (2009). The pitch levels of female speech in two Chinese villages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(5), EL208-EL213. DOI |
10 | Dolson, M. (1994). The pitch of speech as a function of linguistic community. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 321-331. DOI |
11 | Eady, S. J. (1982). Differences in the F0 patterns of speech: Tone language versus stress language. Language and Speech, 25(1), 29-42. DOI |
12 | Eagly, A. H. (1978). Sex differences in influenceability. Psychological Bulletin, 85(1), 86. DOI |
13 | Ellis, C., Kuipers, J. R., Thierry, G., Lovett, V., Turnbull, O., & Jones, M. W. (2015). Language and culture modulate online semantic processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10(10), 1392-1396. DOI |
14 | Fucci, D. J., & Lass, N. J. (1999). Fundamentals of speech science (1st ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. |
15 | Graddol, D., & Swann, J. (1983). Speaking fundamental frequency: Some physical and social correlates. Language and Speech, 26(Pt 4), 351-366. DOI |
16 | Graham, C. (2014). Fundamental frequency range in Japanese and English: The case of simultaneous bilinguals. Phonetica, 71(4), 271-295. DOI |
17 | Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. |
18 | Hollien, H., Hollien, P. A., & de Jong, G. (1997). Effects of three parameters on speaking fundamental frequency. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(5), 2984-2992. DOI |
19 | Hanley, T. D., Snidecor, J. C., & Ringel, R. L. (1966). Some acoustic differences among languages. Phonetica, 14(2), 97-107. DOI |
20 | Hollien, H., & Shipp, T. (1972). Speaking fundamental frequency and chronologic age in males. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15(1), 155-159. DOI |
21 | Huston, A. C. (1983). Sex typing. In P. H. Mussen (Series Ed.) & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 387-467). New York, NY: Wiley. |
22 | Keating, P., & Kuo, G. (2012). Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(2), 1050-1060. DOI |
23 | Kunzel, H. J. (1989). How well does average fundamental frequency correlate with speaker height and weight? Phonetica, 46(1-3), 117-125. DOI |
24 | Laver, J. (1980). The phonetic description of voice quality: Cambridge Studies in Linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. |
25 | Lim, S. B., Lee, G., & Rhee, S.-C. (2016). Effect of language on fundamental frequency: Comparison between Korean and English produced by L2 speakers and bilingual speakers. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 8(4), 15-22. DOI |
26 | Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 940-967. DOI |
27 | Morrison, M. D., & Gore-Hickman, P. (1986). Voice disorders in the elderly. The Journal of Olaryngology, 15(4), 231-234. |
28 | Andreeva, B., Demenko, G., Mobius, B., Zimmerer, F., Jugler, J., & Oleskowicz-Popiel, M. (2014, September). Differences of pitch profiles in Germanic and Slavic languages. Proceedings of Fifteenth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (pp. 1307-1311). Singapore. |
29 | Awan, S. N., & Mueller, P. B. (1996). Speaking fundamental frequency characteristics of white, African American, and Hispanic kindergartners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39(3), 573-577. DOI |
30 | Mennen, I., Schaeffler, F., & Docherty, G. (2012). Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: A comparison of English and German. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 131(3), 2249-2260. DOI |
31 | Murry, T., Brown, W. S., Jr., & Morris, R. J. (1995). Patterns of fundamental frequency for three types of voice samples. Journal of Voice, 9(3), 282-289. DOI |
32 | Mysak, E. D. (1959). Pitch and duration characteristics of older males. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 2(1), 46-54. DOI |
33 | Nevo, L., Nevo, C., & Oliveira, G. (2015). A comparison of vocal parameters in adult bilingual Hebrew-English speakers. CoDAS, 27(5), 483-491. DOI |
34 | Ogunnaike, O., Dunham, Y., & Banaji, M. R. (2010). The language of implicit preferences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(6), 999-1003. DOI |
35 | Ohala, J. J. (1984). An ethological perspective on common crosslanguage utilization of F0 of voice. Phonetica, 41(1), 1-16. DOI |
36 | Ohara, Y. (1999). Performing gender through voice pitch: A cross-cultural analysis of Japanese and American English. In U. Pasero & F. Broun (Eds.). Wahrnehmung und Herstellung von Geschlecht (pp. 105-116). Wiesbaden, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag. |
37 | Ordin, M., & Mennen, I. (2017). Cross-linguistic differences in bilinguals' fundamental frequency ranges. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(6), 1493-1506. DOI |
38 | Ryabov, R., Malakh, M., Trachtenberg, M., Wohl, S., & Oliveira, G. (2016). Self-perceived and acoustic voice characteristics of Russian-English bilinguals. Journal of Voice, 30(6), 772.e1-772.e8. DOI |
39 | Traunmuller, H., & Eriksson, A. (1995). The frequency range of the voice fundamental in the speech of male and female adults. Unpublished manuscript. |
40 | Shrivastav, R., Yamaguchi, H., & Andrews, M. (2000). Effects of stimulation techniques on vocal responses: Implications for assessment and treatment. Journal of Voice, 14(3), 322-330. DOI |
41 | Van Bezooijen, R. (1995). Sociocultural aspects of pitch differences between Japanese and Dutch women. Language and Speech, 38(3), 253-265. DOI |
42 | Van Dommelen, W. A., & Moxness, B. H. (1995). Acoustic parameters in speaker height and weight identification: Sex-specific behaviour. Language and Speech, 38(Pt 3), 267-287. DOI |
43 | Voigt, R., Jurafsky, D., & Sumner, M. (2016). Between- and withinspeaker effects of bilingualism on F0 variation. In Interspeech 2016, 1122-1126. |
44 | Yamazawa, H., & Hollien, H. (1992). Speaking fundamental frequency patterns of Japanese women. Phonetica, 49(2), 128-140. DOI |
45 | Yuan, J., Ryant, N., & Liberman, M. (2014, May). Automatic phonetic segmentation in Mandarin Chinese: Boundary models, glottal features and tone. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 2539-2543). Florence, Italy. |
46 | Zimmerer, F., Jugler, J., Andreeva, B., Mobius, B., & Trouvain, J. (2014). Too cautious to vary more? A comparison of pitch variation in native and non-native productions of French and German speakers. Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 7 (pp. 1037-1041). Dublin, Ireland. |
47 | Zraick, R. I., Nelson, J. L., Montague, J. C., & Monoson, P. K. (2000). The effect of task on determination of maximum phonational frequency range. Journal of Voice, 14(2), 154-160. DOI |