1 |
Bigi, B., & Hirst, D. (2018). Speech phonetization alignment and syllabification (SPPAS): A tool for the automatic analysis of speech prosody [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.sppas.org/
|
2 |
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
|
3 |
Fant, G. (1973). Speech sounds and features. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
4 |
Flynn, N. (2011). Comparing vowel formant normalisation procedures. York Papers in Linguistics Series, 2(11), 1-28.
|
5 |
Fowler, C. A., & Housum, J. (1987). Talkers' signaling of "new" and "old" words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(5), 489-504.
DOI
|
6 |
Hillenbrand, J., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3099-3111.
DOI
|
7 |
Lobanov, B. M. (1971). Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2B), 606-608.
DOI
|
8 |
Nordstroem, P. E., & Lindblom, B. (1975, August). A normalization procedure for vowel formant data. International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Paper #212). Leeds, UK.
|
9 |
Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24(2), 175-184.
DOI
|
10 |
Pickett, J. M. (1980). The sounds of speech communication: A primer of acoustic phonetics and speech perception (Perspectives in Audiology Series). Baltimore, MD.: University Park Press.
|
11 |
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 3.5.1) [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
|
12 |
Renwick, M. E. L., & Ladd, D. R. (2016). Phonetic distinctiveness vs. lexical contrastiveness in Non-Robust phonemic contrasts. Laboratory Phonology, 7(1), 1-29.
DOI
|
13 |
Soskuthy, M. (2017). Generalised additive mixed models for dynamic analysis in linguistics: A practical introduction [Computing Research Repository]. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05339v1
|
14 |
van Rij, J. (2015). Overview of GAMM analysis of time series data. Retrieved from http://www.sfs.uni-tuebingen.de/-jvanrij/Tutorial/GAMM.html
|
15 |
Watt, D., & Fabricius, A. (2002). Evaluation of a technique for improving the mapping of multiple speakers' vowel spaces in the F1-F2 plane. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics, 9, 159-173.
|
16 |
Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalised additive mixed models: An introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
|
17 |
Yang, B. (2009). Formant trajectories of English vowels produced by American males. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 1(3), 65-72.
|
18 |
Wright, R. (2003). Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In J. Local, R. Ogden, & R. Temple (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology VI (pp. 75-87). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
|
19 |
Yang, B. (1990). Development of vowel normalization procedures: English and Korean (Ph.D. Dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin. Retrieved from http://fonetiks.info/bgyang/db/yangphd.pdf
|
20 |
Yang, B. (1996). A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24(2), 245-261.
DOI
|
21 |
Yang, B. (2010). Formant trajectories of English high tense and lax vowel produced by Korean and American speakers. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 35(2), 407-421.
DOI
|
22 |
Yang, B. (2018). Pitch trajectories of English vowels produced by American men, women, and children. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 10(4), 31-37.
DOI
|
23 |
Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. The Annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1-26.
DOI
|